| Date |
Text |
| 2008-06-05 07:34:39 | 900 BRANDYWINE RD |
| | UNITED METHODIST CHURCH |
| | DEC.28, 2007 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 07110731 |
| | ADD: 900 BRANDYWINE RD |
| | CONT: HEDRICK BROTHERS |
| | TEL: (561)281-7530 |
| | |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1-8 COMPLIED |
| | |
| | 9) 2ND REQUEST, PLEASE SEE A-2.1.1 & A2.1.3 BOTH PLANS |
| | INDICATE THE USE OF RAMPS 3/4" /12". SEE DEFINITION OF |
| | RAMP 11-3 A WALKING SURFACE WHICH HAS A RUNNING SLOPE |
| | GREATER THAN 1:20. SEE 11-4.8.5 WHERE HANDRAILS WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED, HORIZONTAL PROJECTIONS GRATER THAN 72". THE |
| | RESPONCE INDICATED THAT THE CITY IS IN RECEIPT OF A |
| | LETTER THAT WAS WRITTEN BY THE BOARD OF THE UNITED |
| | METHODIST OF THE PALM BEACHES, IN A MEETING BETWEEN |
| | ARCHITECT PAUL TWITTY AND ROBERT BROWN THIS WAS AGREED |
| | UPON BUT TO THIS DATE THIS REQUIREMENT HAS NOT BEEN |
| | MET. |
| | |
| | 10) 2ND REQUEST, A-211 & A-2.1.3 BOTH INDICATE THE USE |
| | OF AN ELECTRIC LIFT, PLEASE PROVIDE CODE COMPLIANCE |
| | INFORMATION ON THE LIFT, 11-4.1.3 EXCEPTION# 4. THE |
| | MANUFACTURERS MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1 |
| | AS OF 11-4.11. |
| | |
| | 11-15) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 16) 2ND REQUEST, ROOF HATCHES TO DATE THERE IS ONLY ONE |
| | ROOF HATCH THAT HAS SAUGHT AN APPROVAL WITHIN THE CITY |
| | A COPY OF THAT APPROVAL WAS PROVIDED TO YOUR OFFICE |
| | EARLIER. THIS IS A REQUIREMENT THAT WILL NEED TO BE MET |
| | BEFORE ISSUANCE OF THE PLAN. RULE 9B-72. |
| | |
| | 17-23) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 24) SEMI-COMPLIED, 3-HOUR FUSIBLE LINK DOOR APPROVALS |
| | FOR FIRE RATING HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED TO THIS OFFICE, |
| | DOOR D-173 IS OPEN TO AN EXTERIOR CORRIDOR WHICH WILL |
| | ALSO BE EXPOSED TO WIND AND WILL NEED A TEST REPORT |
| | ALSO FOR WIND PRESSURES. SINCE THERE IS NO GLAZING IN |
| | THIS DOOR IT WILL ONLY NEED TO BE TESTED FOR WIND |
| | RESISTANCE AND NEED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | 1714.5.3.1. |
| | |
| | 25) SEMI COMPLIED IMPACT RATED GLASS AND FRAMES A-7.3.3 |
| | THE DALLE DE VERRE GLASS ALUMINUM WINDOWS PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY IF THE DALLE DE VERRE IS THE MANUFACTURER OF |
| | THE WHOLE WINDOW UNIT INCLUSIVE OF WINDOW FRAME OR IF |
| | THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR A STAIN GLASS INSET PANEL |
| | WHICH WILL BE SANDWICHED WITHIN A WINDOW AND FRAME UNIT |
| | THAT HAS BEEN TESTED FOR LARGE MISSILE IMPACT TESTING |
| | AND RECEIVED A ACCEPTANCE REPORT. ON BOTH THE FLORIDA |
| | WEBSITE AND THE MIAMI-DADE WEBSITE DALLE DE VERRE GLASS |
| | DOE NOT INDICATE THAT ANY OF THEIR PRODUCTS HAVE BEEN |
| | TESTED TO COMPLY WITH 1609.1.4. |
| | |
| | 26 ) 2ND REQUEST, FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & |
| | CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES, |
| | 3 IF THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR OF PRODUCT TESTING |
| | REPORTS, MISSING REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: |
| | |
| | A) GLAZED OPENINGS, FIXED |
| | YKKAP YHS 50 TU NOA 05-0317.03 IS MISSING THE FLORIDA |
| | APPROVAL, THERE ARE (3) APRROVALS THIS WINDOW CAN FALL |
| | UNDER, 2ND NO SHOP DRAWING STAMP OF APPROVAL FROM THE |
| | DESIGN TEAMPLEASE |
| | AFFIX THIS STAMP TO THE FRONT OF THE DOCUMENT, PLACED |
| | ON THE BACK DOES NOT TIE IT TO THE DOCUMENT WHEN |
| | STAMPED.SHEETS 3-5 THE TOP OF THE COLUMN HEADINGS ARE |
| | CUT OFF AND NO IDENTIFICATION OF |
| | THESE HEADINGS ARE NOT KNOWN. |
| | |
| | SHEET A-7.3.1 WINDOW TYPE J A SEMI CIRCULAR WINDOW IS |
| | MISSING THERE APPROVA NO SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | YKK YHC-300 O/G CURTAIN WALL NOA 06-0306.02 IS MISSING |
| | THE FLORIDA APPROVAL, AND NO SHOP DRAWING STAMP OF |
| | APPROVAL FROM THE DESIGN TEAM, PLEASE AFFIX ON THE |
| | FRONT OF THE DOCUMENT. |
| | PLEASE IDENTIFY GLASS TYPE TO BE USED , THIS WILL |
| | EFFECT PRESSURE RATINGS OF GLASS. |
| | |
| | B) GLAZED OPENINGS, OPERABLE YKK YOW 225H NON-THERMAL |
| | ALUMINUM CASEMENT WINDOWSPLEASE NOTE THE WINDOW |
| | LIMITATION IN HEIGTH OF 62'" NOT THE 75.5" AS INDICATED |
| | ON THE PLANS. PLEASE APPLY THE DESIGN TEAMS APPROVAL ON |
| | THE FRONT OF THE DOCUMENT NOT THE BACK AS ON THIS |
| | DOCUMENTSHOWING APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | C) MULLIONS- MAY OR MAYNOT BE INCLUDED IN THE WINDOW |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL WITH THE CASEMENT WINDOWS BEING A |
| | ISSUE THIS MAY STILL BE A CONCERN. SHEET A-7.3.1 DETAIL |
| | B2 INDICATES THE USE OF 2 MULLIONS FOR DOUBLE UNITS. |
| | |
| | D) EXTERIOR GLAZED DOORS |
| | YKK 35H SERIES ALUMINUM OUTSWING ENTRANCE DOOR, MISSING |
| | THE FLORIDA COVER SHEET, |
| | |
| | E) EXTERIOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS |
| | DOORS 127 & 128 ARE EXTERIOR DOORS TO RESTROOMS A-7.2.1 |
| | DOOR SCHEDULE INDICATES THESE DOORS ARE HOLLOW METAL |
| | DOORS BUT THE DOOR TYPE# 2 INDICATES THESE ARE WOOD |
| | INTERIOR DOORS. |
| | PAIR OF DOORS A147 EXTERIOR METAL DOORS WITH LOUVER |
| | PAIR OF DOORS A108 EXTERIR HOLLOW METAL DOORS |
| | NO PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED FOR HOLLOW METAL |
| | DOORS |
| | |
| | NEW DOOR HEADING: |
| | EXTERIOR WOOD DOOR |
| | EXTERIOR WOOD DOORS WITH GLAZING |
| | IN BOTH CASES OF THE EXTERIOR WOOD DOORS SITE SPECIFIC |
| | REPORT WILL NEED TO BE SUPPLIED SEE ATTACHEMENT FOR |
| | LOCAL AND SITE SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVAL REPORTS |
| | MEERTING THE REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | RULE 9B-72.040PRODUCT EVALUATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE |
| | FOR LOCAL APPROVAL. |
| | METHOD 2 (B) AN EVALUATION REPORT FROM A FLORIDA |
| | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER DEVELOPED AND SIGNED AND SEALED, |
| | BASED UPON TESTING, OR COMPARARATIVE OR RATIONAL |
| | ANALYSIS, OR COMBINATION THEREOF WHICH PROVIDES |
| | VERIFIBLE DOCUMENTATIONINDICATING THE PRODUCT WAS |
| | EVALUATED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE AND THAT |
| | THE PRODUCT IS, FOR THE PURPOSE INTENDED, AT LEAST |
| | EQUIVALENT TO THAT REQUIRED BY THE CODE. |
| | NOTE: THE CUSTOM WOOD ENTRY DOORS WITH GLAZED OPENINGS |
| | WILL NOT NEED TO MEET LARGE MISSILE IMPACT RESISTANCE |
| | AS PER THE BUILDING OFFICIALS INTERPRETATION PHAMPHLET |
| | QUESTION# 15. |
| | |
| | F) EXTERIOR ROLL UP DOORS- COVERED UNDER COMMENT# 24 |
| | REQUIRES PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR WIND |
| | |
| | G) ROOF ACCESS HATCHES- NO APPROVAL SUBMITTED |
| | |
| | H) PANEL WALL SYSTEMS : LOUVERS NO APPROVALS SUBMITTED |
| | |
| | I) PANEL WALL SYSTEMS: EFIS WALL SYSTEMS - REMOVED FROM |
| | PROJECT NOT REQUIRED |
| | |
| | J) ROOFING SYSTEMS BOTH FOR FLAT ROOF AND TILED SLOPED |
| | SYSTEMS |
| | |
| | JOHN MANSVILLE MODIFIED NOA 07-0228.04 NO FLORIDA |
| | APPROVAL SUBMITTED. PAGES 7-41 OF THE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | THAT WAS SUBMITTED ARE SUB-SYSTEMS, EACH OF THESE |
| | SUB-SYSTEMS HAVE ASSOCIATED |
| | WIND PRESSURES THAT MAY OR MAY NO REQUIRE ENHANCED |
| | FASTENING. PLEASE CIRCLE THE SUB-SYSTEM TO BE |
| | INSTALLED, NOTE THE ASSOCIATED PRESSURES WITH THAT |
| | SUB-SYSTEM IF THE PRESSURES ARE LESS THAN 89PSF FOR |
| | ZONES 2 AND 3 , ENHANCED FASTENING WILL BE REQUIRED. |
| | PLEASE LOOK AT THE HIGH LIGHTED SUB-SYSTEM PICKED TO |
| | SEE IF LIMITATION 7 OR 9 EXIST. LIMITATION# 7 WILL |
| | ALLOW ENHANCED FASTENING IN ZONES 2& 3 LIMITATION# 9 |
| | WILL NOT ALLOW ENHANCEDFASTENING. THIS REPORT DOES |
| | REQUIRE A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL TO COMPLETE THE RAS 117 |
| | CALCULATION FOR ENHANCED FASTENING. |
| | |
| | POLYFOAM - NO PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED NOR |
| | FLORIDA COVER SHEET. THEERE ARE 4 SEPERATE FLORIDA |
| | APPROVALS ON THE WEBSITE. RULE 9B-72. NOT KNOWN AS TO |
| | WHAT PATTY SIZE WIL BE USED WITH ASSOCIATED PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | SANTAFE TILE , NO FLORIDA APPROVLA WAS SUBMITTED |
| | |
| | CENTRIA- RIB METAL WALL PANEL -NO FL APPROVAL |
| | SUBMITTED |
| | |
| | CLAYLITE- NO PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED, CLAY TILE |
| | VENTURES DOES HAVE A FL COVERSHEET. |
| | |
| | 27) PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT APPLICATION |
| | AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION PLEASE |
| | SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. |
| | PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE |
| | SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT |
| | IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT |
| | HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR |
| | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE |
| | 9B-72. SEE ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| | |
| | 28-31) PART OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALSSEMI COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 32) NEW COMMENT: |
| | SHEET A-7.2.1/ DOOR SCHEDULE: |
| | DOOR# 113B& C REVISION INDICATES THESE DOORS ARE TO BE |
| | A FIRE RATED 45 MINUTE DOOR, IF THESE DOORS ARE TO BE |
| | CUSTOM MADE WHO WILL PROVIDE THE FIRE RATING FOR THESE |
| | DOORS? |
| | 715.3 HSA TEST REQUIREMENTS PLUS THE DOOR ALSO HAS |
| | GLAZED OPENINGS THAT WILL NEED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS |
| | OF 715.4 FIRE-PROTECTION RATED GLAZING. |
| | |
| | DOOR 114A IS INDICATED AS A 90 MINUTE DOOR, TYPE 12 A |
| | SINGLE DOOR WITH LITE SEE TABLE 715.4 AND 715.4.3 |
| | |
| | DOOR 126A & C BOTH ARE INDICATED AS A DOOR TYPE 9 A |
| | HOLLOW METAL DOOR BUT THE DEPICTION INDICATES THIS DOOR |
| | TO BE A WOOD ENTRY DOOR WITH WOOD PANELS, 90 MINUTE |
| | DOOR? |
| | |
| | DOOR 135A & 140A BOTH INDICATE THE DOOR TYPE TO BE A 12 |
| | SINGLE DOOR WITH LITE, SEE TABLE 715.4 AND 715.4.3 |
| | |
| | DOOR 145B IS LISTED AS A DOOR TYPE 2 HOLLOW METAL 90 |
| | MINUTE DOOR BUT DEPICTED AS A WOOD DOOR. |
| | |
| | .DOOR 143A&C BOTH ARE INDICATED AS A DOOR TYPE 9 A |
| | HOLLOW METAL DOOR BUT THE DEPICTION INDICATES THIS DOOR |
| | TO BE A WOOD ENTRY DOOR WITH WOOD PANELS, 90 MINUTE |
| | DOOR? |
| | |
| | 33) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT |
| | FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL |
| | PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND |
| | A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | JIM WITMER C. B. O. |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II |
| | |
| | TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| | FAX: (561)659-8026 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS |
| | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS |
| | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO |
| | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE |
| | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT APPLICATION |
| | AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION PLEASE |
| | SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. |
| | PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE |
| | SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT |
| | IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT |
| | HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR |
| | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE |
| | 9B-72. SEE ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |