Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 07110439
Permit Number 07110439
Review Stop B
Sequence Number 3
Notes
Date Text
2008-04-25 14:46:36****CORRECTIONS****
 ****COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS LIST, SAME PLANS SUBMITTED
 DATED 1/11/8***
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
  
 FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004
 FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING
 CODE
 FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC*
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 FAC
 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
 FSFLORIDA STATUTE
  
  
 1.)INCLUDE A CODE SUMMARY; BUILDING TYPE FBC6,
 BUILDING HEIGHT AND AREA FBC5, SPRINKLER INFORMATION,
 OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION FBC 3 AND AREA PER OCCUPANCY.
  
 2.)SEE PREVIOUS LIST, ITEM 7.THIS APPEARS TO BE A
 CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY AS YOU MAKE REFERENCE TO "NEW
 OFFICE".PLEASE MAKE NOTE CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY IN THE
 CODE SUMMARY.
  
 3.)FBC1004, DECLARE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION FOR EACH
 PORTION OF BUILDING. SEE PREVIOUS LIST, ITEM 7. DECLARE
 OCCUPANT LOAD, FBC1004.1.
  
 4.)DECLARE HAZARD CATEGORY FOR LIFE SAFETY AND EXITS,
 HEIGHTS AND AREAS, AND EXPOSURE OF EXTERIOR WALLS FBC
 TABLES 812.4.1, 812.4.2, AND 812.4.3 RESPECTIVELY.
 DECLARE EXISTING AND PROPOSED.
  
 5.)CLARIFY WHETHER THE UPSTAIRS OFFICE IS A MEZZANINE
 OR SECOND STORY.IF THIS IS A MEZZANINE, SHOW
 COMPLIANCE WITH FBC505.2, FBC505.4.PROVIDE
 CALCULATIONS AS THE ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION WAS BUILT
 BASED ON UNENCLOSED MEZZANINE SPACE.
  
 6.)SEE PREVIOUS COMMENT LIST, ITEM 3.GOVERNING CODE
 SHOULD INCLUDE 2007 REVISIONS WHICH BECAME EFFECTIVE
 JULY 1, 2007.PLEASE REVISE.
  
 7.)SEE PREVIOUS COMMENT LIST, ITEM 4.PROVIDE A
 FRAMING DETAIL FOR THE NEW WALL OPENING.
  
 8.)SEE PREVIOUS COMMENT LIST, ITEM 6.PROVIDE CONDO
 ASSOCIATION APPROVAL AS YOU ARE ALTERING THE OUTSIDE OF
 THE BUILDING.
  
 THE LETTER PROVIDED FOR ZONING STATES THAT THE CONDO
 ASSOCIATION DOES NOT REQUIRE APPROVAL FOR INTERIOR
 ALTERATION.THIS JOB INCLUDES INSTALLING WINDOWS WHICH
 IS ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING.THE AHJ REQUIRES A
 LETTER FROM THE CONDO ASSOCIATION AS TECHNICALLY THE
 OWNER DOES NOT OWN THE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING.
  
 9.)PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE PROPOSED WINDOWS
 AND MULLIONS, FAC9B72, WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCT
 APPROVALS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD
 (SHOP DRAWING REVIEW STAMP OR LETTER), FBC*106.3.3.
  
 10.)ADDRESSED.
  
 11.)PROVIDE DETAIL MARKERS ON THE PLAN AND LABEL THE
 DETAIL.NOTE THAT THE GRAPHIC FOR THE L SHAPE WALL AT
 THE DISPLAY/STORAGE AREA IS APPROXIMATELY FOUR TIMES
 THE WIDTH FOR THE DRESSING ROOM PARTITION WALLS. ONLY
 ONE WALL DETAIL WAS PROVIDED.IF YOU ARE USING THE
 SAME DETAIL FOR BOTH WALLS, PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY ONE IS
 SO MUCH WIDER THAN THE OTHER ON THE FLOOR PLAN.
  
 12.)THE L SHAPE ON THE PLAN APPEARS TO BE A WALL.IF
 IT IS A WALL, CLARIFY HOW THIS WILL BE A DISPLAY AREA
 AS IT IS NOT VISIBLE.
  
 13.)THE TWO APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED WERE FOR A
 DRESSING ROOM AREA.THE LETTER SIGNED BY JAE KIM
 STATES THAT THIS IS A WAREHOUSE, NO ACCESS TO THE
 PUBLIC, AND THE DRESSING ROOM IS TO BE USED BY MODELS
 ONLY.THE PLANS SHOW THIS AS STORAGE/DISPLAY, NOT
 DRESSING ROOM FOR MODELS ONLY (NOT PUBLIC).THE
 ENGINEER IS TO INCORPORATE A SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF
 USE OF THIS AREA INTO THE SIGNED AND SEALED PLAN, ALSO
 SUBMIT A SIGNED AND SEALED LETTER IF NECESSARY FOR
 CLARIFICATION, AS THE PLAN CURRENTLY CONFLICTS WITH THE
 LETTER AND APPLICATION.WITHOUT SPECIFIC INFORMATION
 REGARDING THE USE, OCCUPANCY, AND OCCUPANT LOAD OF THIS
 AREA, CODE REQUIREMENTS CANNOT BE DETERMINED.
  
 14.)FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS REQUIRED AT THIS TIME (HEAD
 SCHEMATIC) IF SPRINKLERS ARE REQUIRED FOR CODE
 COMPLIANCE, FBC*106.3.5.1.1(5), FS553.79 (2).
  
 15.)VERTICAL ACCESSIBILITY REQUIRED FOR THE OFFICE
 AREA.SEE FBC11-4.1.6(1)(K)(III).IF VERTICAL
 ACCESSIBILITY IS NOT BEING PROVIDED, ANY APPLICABLE
 EXEMPTIONS ARE TO BE INCORPORATED INTO THE PLAN.
  
 16.)SHOW RACK DISTANCE.FBC1016.3.
  
 17.)SIGNATURE FOR ENGINEER TO BE AN ORIGINAL PER
 FBPE, FS471.
  
 18.)CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION TO BE INCLUDED ON
 EACH SHEETS, FAC61G15-23.002.
  
 19.)CODE COMPLIANCE AND A COMPLETE CHECKLIST CANNOT
 BE PROVIDED AT THIS TIME DUE TO INSUFFICIENT OR
 INCONSISTENT INFORMATION.
  
 20.)PLEASE PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN OF COST FOR THIS
 PERMIT.
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
  
 21.)WHEN RESUBMITTING, PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER
 EXPLAINING HOW EACH ITEM WAS ADDRESSED.
  
 22.)SEE ATTACHED FS553.80(2)(B).A 4X PLAN REVIEW
 FEE WILL BE CHARGED IF THE COMMENTS ARE NOT PROPERLY
 ADDRESSED A THIRD TIME.
  
 23.)SEE COMMENT 9.AS PRODUCT APPROVALS HAVE NOT
 BEEN SUBMITTED, IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE ENGINEER'S
 INTENTION IS FOR THE OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR IS TO BE USED
 AS IMPACT PROTECTION.PLEASE CLARIFY THIS ISSUE.
  
 24.)TWO SETS OF PLANS REQUIRED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE.
 ONE SET WAS RETAINED FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW AND WILL NOT
 BE RETURNED TO THE CONTRACTOR, BUT REGARDLESS CANNOT BE
 USED FOR PERMITTING AS IT IS NOT CODE COMPLIANT AND THE
 SIGNATURE IS A PHOTOCOPY.PLANS NEED TO BE REVISED
 ADDRESSING ALL COMMENTS FOR ALL TRADES AND TWO SETS
 WITH ORIGINAL SIGNATURES SUBMITTED.TWO SETS OF ALL
 PERMIT DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED (INCLUDING ANY
 APPLICABLE LETTERS, PRODUCT APPROVALS, ETC.).
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved