| Date |
Text |
| 2007-11-15 15:49:18 | RESIDENTIAL ADDITION BUILDING REVIEW FIRST CHECKLIST. |
| | REVIEW UNDER EXISTING BUILDING CODE 2004, FLORIDA |
| | RESIDENTIAL CODE 2004 AND FBC 2004 WITH 2007 |
| | REVISIONS. |
| | |
| | 1- PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE A5 (BASE FLOOD |
| | ELEVATION 7').FINISH FLOOR NEEDS TO BE AT LEAST 6" |
| | ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION AS REQUIRED BY CITY CODE |
| | SEC. 94-546(1). NEED TO SPECIFY ON PLANS AND/OR SURVEY |
| | THE MINIMUM FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION. |
| | |
| | 2-A) SURVEY SUBMITTED SAYS FLOOD ZONE "C". REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. CORRECT FLOOD ZONE IS "A5". |
| | |
| | B) SURVEY TO HAVE ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, NOT RUBBER |
| | STAMP AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 472 FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| | |
| | 3- REMAINDER:ELEVATION CERTIFICATE WILL BE REQUIRED |
| | PRIOR TO OBTAINING THE C.O. THIS INFORMATION TO BE |
| | PROVIDED TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR. COORDINATE WITH |
| | INSPECTORTO AVOID DELAYS OR CONFLICTS. |
| | |
| | 4- PROVIDE COMPLETE DECK GUARDDETAILS/SPECS TO VERIFY |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH TABLE R301.5 AND SEC. R312 OF 2004 |
| | FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | |
| | 5- HOW DO YOU ACCESS THE ROOF DECK?. EXTERIOR |
| | ELEVATIONS DON'T SHOW ANY DOORS LEADING TO THE ROOF |
| | DECK?. |
| | |
| | 6- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE |
| | 9B-72 FOR: |
| | A) PRECAST LINTELS. NOS #03-0605.04 SUBMITTED IS FOR |
| | 4", 6" AND 12" LINTELS. DRAWINGS CALL FOR 8" LINTELS. |
| | PROVIDE CORRECT NOA. |
| | |
| | B) WHITE CEMENT TILE. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS CALL FOR |
| | WHITE CEMENT TILE TO MATCH EXISTING. |
| | |
| | C) BAHAMA SHUTTERS IF THEY ARE NEW. PLANS ARE NOT |
| | CLEAR IF EXISTING OR NEW. AND,PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | INSTALLATION SCHEDULE, SEE ATTACHED SAMPLE,OR USE ANY |
| | OTHER WAY THAT PROVIDES COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR |
| | INSTALLATION. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004 |
| | |
| | 7- WHY SUBMITTING PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SIMPSON |
| | STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS IF THERE ARE NONE SPECIFIED ON |
| | PLANS? |
| | |
| | |
| | 8- DESIGNEROF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 9- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY SPECIFIC 10D NAIL TO |
| | BE USED FORROOF TILE FASTENING. SEE PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.1.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | (ELEVATIONS CALL FOR ROOF TILE TO MATCH EXISTING). |
| | DESIGNER SPECIFIES INSTALLATION THAT MEETS HIS |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR UPLIFT RESISTANCE, PRODUCT APPROVAL IS |
| | JUST TO VERIFY THAT PROPOSED INSTALLATION MEETS THE |
| | DESIGN CRITERIA. |
| | |
| | 10- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| | A) ITEM 10(A) CALLS FOR UNDER ATTICAREA WITH R-19 |
| | INSULATION. SEE PLANS FOR CORRECT TYPE OF CEILING |
| | ASSEMBLY AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. COORDINATE WITH |
| | ARCHITECT, INCLUDING INSULATION. |
| | |
| | B) PROVIDECOMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| | INCLUDING BUILDER NAME. |
| | |
| | C) OWNER/AGENT TO SIGN AND DATE BOTTOM OF FORM. |
| | |
| | 11- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO COORDINATE WITH THE ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS AND SHOW HOW THE REQUIRED CEILING |
| | INSULATION WILL BE ACHIEVED TO COMPLY WITH THE ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 13-600 OF FBC 2004. |
| | PROVIDE DETAILS/SPECS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO |
| | FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 12- SHEET A-1: |
| | A) REVISE ALLOWABLE SHIM SPACING ON DOOR AND WINDOW |
| | NOTE #7. SEE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR MAXIMUM SHIM SPACE |
| | ALLOWED. AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | B) PRODUCT APPROVALS NOAS NUMBERS LISTED FOR DOORS |
| | AND WINDOWS DON'T MATCH THOSE PROVIDED BY THE |
| | CONTRACTOR. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | C) CODE SPECIFICATIONS CALLS FOR FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | CODE 2004 WITH 2006 REVISIONS. CORRECT REVISIONS TO BE |
| | REFERENCED ARE THE 2007 REVISIONS AS OF JULY 1ST 2007. |
| | UPDATE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | D) ROOM FINISH NOTE #2 DOESN'T APPLY TO THIS |
| | PROJECT. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 13- SHEET A-2:EXTERIOR FRENCH DOORS ON THE LEFT OF |
| | THE KITCHEN AREA ARE "INSWING"DOORS AND ARE TO BE |
| | RELOCATED. WHERE ARE THESE DOOR RELOCATED TO ?.PLANS |
| | SHOW "OUTSWING" PAIR OF FRENCH DOORSIN THE SAME FOYER |
| | AREA. ARE THESE THE SAME DOORS? DOORS CAN'T BE SWITCHED |
| | FROM INSWING TO OUTSWING BECAUSE THE DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | ARE NOT THE SAME.PROVIDE CLARIFICATION AS REQUIRED |
| | AND PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 14- SHEET A-3: |
| | A) STEEL ANGLE SIZE SHOWN ON DETAIL2/A-3 DOESN'T |
| | MATCH SIZE SHOWN ON ROOF SLAB FRAMING PLAN. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) SOIL BEARINGCAPACITY SPECIFIED ON FOUNDATION |
| | PLAN DOESN'T MATCH SOIL BEARING CAPACITY SHOWN ON |
| | COLUMN SCHEDULE NOTES.ALSO, COORDINATE WITH |
| | INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE SOIL TEST REPORT. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | C) DECK LOAD. CLARIFY WHAT DOESTHE ABBREVIATION |
| | SYS STANDS FOR?. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC |
| | 2004. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
