| Date |
Text |
| 2008-02-26 09:42:08 | 2004 FBC W/2007 REVISIONS |
| | ADDITION |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | |
| | 1) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT CAN BE |
| | ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO |
| | PALM BEACH COUNTY.THE PLANS MUST BE |
| | STAMPED AND THE RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE APPLICATION. |
| | 233-5025 |
| | |
| | 2) A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 3) THE ENERGY CALCULATION FORM IS OUTDATED. THE CURRENT |
| | FORM IS 600C-04. THE FORM IS REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND |
| | DATED BY THE OWNER/AGENT. SEE FBC 11-600. |
| | |
| | 4) SUBMIT THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS, FLOOR |
| | FRAMING PLAN AND SHOP DRAWINGS FOR THE HAMBRO FLOOR |
| | SYSTEM. FBC 106.1.2* CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | 5) SHOP DRAWINGS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE GUARD RAILS |
| | AT THE BALCONY, SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH R312. FBC |
| | 106.1.2* CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | 6) THE WINDLOAD SCHEDULE ON SHEET 2 DOES NOT SPECIFY |
| | THE PRESSURES FOR ROOF ZONE 3. PLEASE REVISE. SEE FBC |
| | TABLE R301.2(2). |
| | |
| | 7) THE ROOF ZONE DIAGRAM ON SHEET 2 DOES NOT INDICATE |
| | ROOF ZONE 3 AT THE CORNERS. PLEASE CORRECT. SEE FIGURE |
| | R301.2 (8). |
| | |
| | 8) REVISE THE ROOF SHEATHING NAILING SCHEDULE ON SHEET |
| | 2 TO COMPLY WITH R803.2.3.1 SHEATHING FASTENINGS. WOOD |
| | STRUCTURAL PANEL SHEATHING SHALL BE FASTENED TO ROOF |
| | FRAMING WITH 8D RING-SHANK NAILS AT 6 INCHES ON CENTER |
| | AT EDGES AND 6 INCHES ON CENTER AT INTERMEDIATE |
| | FRAMING. RING-SHANK NAILS SHALL HAVE THE FOLLOWING |
| | MINIMUM DIMENSIONS: |
| | 1.0.113-INCH NOMINAL SHANK DIAMETER |
| | 2.RING DIAMETER OF 0.012 OVER SHANK DIAMETER 3. |
| | 16 TO 20 RINGS PER INCH |
| | 4.0.280 INCH FULL ROUND HEAD DIAMETER |
| | 5.2-INCH NAIL LENGTH |
| | WHERE ROOF FRAMING WITH A SPECIFIC GRAVITY, 0.42 < G < |
| | 0.49 IS USED, SPACING OF RING-SHANK FASTENERS SHALL BE |
| | 4 INCHES ON CENTER IN NAILING ZONE 3 FOR 130 MPH OR |
| | GREATER DESIGN WIND SPEEDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FIGURE |
| | R803.2.3.1 . |
| | |
| | 9) THE STATEMENT ON SHEET 2 THAT RING SHANK NAILS ARE |
| | NOT REQUIRED WHEN MEAN ROOF HEIGHT IS LESS THAN 25 FEET |
| | IS INCORRECT. PLEASE REVISE. SEE R 803.2.1. |
| | |
| | 10) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE ROOF ACCESS HATCH |
| | AND THE SKYLITE SHOWN ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET |
| | 3. FAC RULE 9B-72 |
| | |
| | 11) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT WAS SUBMITTED FOR THE GAF |
| | MODIFIED ROOF SYSTEM IS INCOMPLETE. THE SHEETS WITH THE |
| | APPROVED ASSEMBLY AND LIMITATIONS ARE MISSING. THE |
| | APPROVED ASSEMBLY, THE FASTENING OPTION, THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURE AND RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR ENHANCED |
| | FASTENING THAT WILL BE USED ARE REQUIRED TO BE |
| | SPECIFIED. |
| | |
| | 12)PRODUCT APPROVAL FL4904 FOR THE MASONITE |
| | INTERNATIONAL EXTERIOR DOORS IS OK FOR THE SINGLE |
| | INSWING DOOR. HOWEVER, THE DESIGN PRESSURES ARE TOO LOW |
| | FOR THE NON-IMPACT RATED GLAZED DOUBLE DOORS. WHEN |
| | MULTIPLE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE SAME ITEMS ARE |
| | SUBMITTED IT IS HELPFUL IF THE SPECIFIC ITEM TO WHICH |
| | IT APPLIES IS NOTED THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. FAC RULE |
| | 9B-72 |
| | |
| | 13) THE DRAWINGS ATTACHED TO THE COVERSHEET FOR THE PGT |
| | SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS ARE THE WRONG ONES AND ARE EXPIRED. |
| | SEE FL 2939-R10. FAC RULE 9B-72 |
| | |
| | 14) DUE TO THE REVISIONS TO THE PLANS, THE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS FOR THE ROOF TILE NO LONGER APPLY. PLEASE |
| | REMOVE THEM FROM THE SUBMITTALS. |
| | |
| | 15) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF A KEY PLAN AND INSTALLATION |
| | SCHEDULE FOR THE STORM PANELS. SPECIFY THE MOUNT TYPE, |
| | ANCHOR TYPE, ANCHOR SPACING, EDGE DISTANCE, ETC. FBC |
| | 301.2.1.2SEE SAMPLE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE ATTACHED. |
| | |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| | (561)805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
