| Date |
Text |
| 2007-12-28 15:47:02 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL |
| | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | |
| | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FSFLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | |
| | 1.THE VALUE OF THE JOB IS TO INCLUDE LABOR (NOTE THAT |
| | FEES ARE CHARGED BASED ON VALUE, NOT COST).$4800 HAS |
| | BEEN ADDED AS A LABOR COST TO REMOVE AND INSTALL 16 |
| | WINDOWS, INSTALL 16 SHUTTERS. |
| | |
| | 2.PLEASE KEEP THE PRESTORM PREPARATION PLAN IN THE |
| | PERMIT PACKAGE (REQUIRED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE). |
| | |
| | 3.ALL CHANGES TO THE PLAN ARE TO BE CLOUDED AND |
| | MARKED WITH A REVISION NUMBER.FAILURE TO DO THIS |
| | CAUSES FURTHER DELAYS.SEE CORRECTION #4. |
| | |
| | 4.SOME WINDOWS HAVE NOW BEEN MARKED "EXISTING |
| | EGRESS".IT IS NOT CLEAR WHY THIS LANGUAGE HAS BEEN |
| | ADDED; IT DOES NOT APPEAR ON THE PLAN DATED 12/6/07. |
| | THE WINDOWS DO NOT COMPLY WITH EMERGENCY EGRESS |
| | REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO DAY CARE ROOMS.THE |
| | RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT EMERGENCY EGRESS IS NOT |
| | REQUIRED.WHY HAS THE PLAN BEEN REVISED IN THIS WAY? |
| | |
| | ALSO, THIS CHANGE HAS NOT BEEN CLOUDED.HAS ANYTHING |
| | ELSE ON THE PLAN BEEN REVISED AND NOT SHOWN AS A |
| | REVISION?PLEASE REMOVE THIS LANGUAGE FROM THE PLAN OR |
| | REVISE THE PLAN TO COMPLY WITH EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 5.THE SCOPE OF WORK IS NOT CLEAR.THE APPLICATION |
| | STATES "REMOVAL & INSTALLATION OF 11 WINDOWS".WINDOWS |
| | ARE MARKED 1, 2, "EXISTING EGRESS" OR "EXISTING".THE |
| | SHUTTER INSTALLATION SCHEDULE INCLUDES INFORMATION FOR |
| | OPENING TYPES 1 AND 2. |
| | |
| | A.REVISE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE TO CORRELATE WITH EACH |
| | OPENING.YOU MAY USE ONE LINE FOR SEVERAL OPENINGS BUT |
| | THE INFORMATION MUST BE CORRECT.THE OPENING SIZE ON |
| | THE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE SHOULD BE THE OPENING SIZE, |
| | NOT THE WINDOW SIZE. |
| | |
| | B.AREN'T THE WINDOWS IN OPENINGS "EXISTING EGRESS" |
| | AND "EXISTING" BEING REPLACED?SHUTTERS OVER THESE |
| | WINDOWS WAS AN ISSUE IN PREVIOUS PLAN REVIEWS, BUT THE |
| | PLAN NOW DOESN'T SHOW THEM AS HAVING SHUTTERS |
| | INSTALLED.CLARIFY WHICH WINDOWS ARE BEING REPLACED, |
| | WHICH OPENINGS WILL HAVE SHUTTERS INSTALLED. |
| | |
| | C.APPLICATION STATES 11 WINDOWS;PLAN SHOWS 16 |
| | WINDOWS, 7 OPENINGS.THE PLAN SHOWS A LOT OF |
| | INFORMATION WHICH IS NOT REQUIRED, YET DOES NOT INCLUDE |
| | THE INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE.THE |
| | PERMIT APPLICATION SHOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THE SCOPE |
| | OF WORK AND THE PLAN.PLEASE REVISE. |
| | |
| | 6.FOR THE WINDOWS, SHUTTERS, AND MULLIONS, THE |
| | FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
| | |
| | A.FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL, |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| | |
| | B.EVALUATION REPORT |
| | |
| | C.INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS |
| | |
| | PREVIOUSLY, A MIAMIDADE NOA WAS SUBMITTED.NOAS |
| | INCLUDE THE EVALUATION REPORT AND THE INSTALLATION |
| | INSTRUCTIONS IN ONE DOCUMENT.HOWEVER, FLORIDA STATE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS NOT SUBMITTED.NOW, ONLY |
| | MIAMIDADE NOA FOR THE SINGLE HUNG WINDOW HAS BEEN |
| | PROVIDED ALONG WITH TWO COPIES OF THE FLORIDA STATE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL, A SPEC SHEET FOR THE SHUTTERS (NO |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL), AND NOTHING FOR THE MULLIONS. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED PAPERWORK FOR EACH ITEM; |
| | TWO SETS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
