| Date |
Text |
| 2008-03-17 17:06:33 | ****DENIED***** |
| | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS (NOT MARKED OK) TAKEN FROM THE |
| | PREVIOUS FIRE PLAN REVIEW STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED: |
| | |
| | 1.THE ADDRESS (CORRECT) OF THE PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK |
| | SITE SHALL BE IN THE TITLE BLOCK OF EACH SUBMITTED PLAN |
| | SHEET. |
| | |
| | 2.OK |
| | |
| | 3.EMERGENCY LIGHTING FOR THE WAREHOUSE PORTION OF |
| | THIS GENERAL INDUSTRIAL OCCUPANCY SHALL BE REQUIRED AS |
| | PER NFPA 101, LIFE SAFETY CODE, 2003 EDITION 40.2.9.1, |
| | EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE EXEMPTED BY 40.2.9.2 |
| | |
| | 4.SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE 2A:10BC RATED FIRE |
| | EXTINGUISHER(S) WHICH SATISFY THE 75' TRAVEL DISTANCE. |
| | |
| | 5.BOTH PLAN SHEET 3 & 6 SHOW WALL SEPARATION BETWEEN |
| | THE SHOWROOM AND THE WAREHOUSE FOR SPACE A & SPACE B. |
| | WHAT IS THE WALL RATING BETWEEN THE SHOWROOM AND |
| | WAREHOUSE?WHAT IS THE DOOR RATING? |
| | |
| | 6.OK |
| | |
| | 7.ADD THE INTERIOR FINISH CLASSIFICATION (CLASS C, AS |
| | PER YOUR RESPONSE LETTER) TO AN APPROPIATE PLAN SHEET. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT: |
| | |
| | A.ON SHEET 6, IN SPACE A AND SPACE B, AN EXIT LIGHT |
| | IS SHOWN ON BOTH SIDES OF THE DOOR BETWEEN THE |
| | WAREHOUSE AND SHOWROOM.ELIMINATE THE EXIT LIGHT |
| | DIRECTING PATRONS BACK INTO THE MORE HAZARDOUS |
| | WAREHOUSE AREA. |
| | |
| | |
| | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER INDICATING WHERE ON THE APPROPIATE PLAN SHEET |
| | EACH COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED |
| | |
| | |
| | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS |
| | FIRE PLAN REVIEW |
| | 561-8054-6722 |
