| Date |
Text |
| 2008-04-14 11:29:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL |
| | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FSFLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: |
| | |
| | 1.)THIS IS AN AT RISK PERMIT (SHELL ONLY). |
| | INFORMATIONAL; NOT REQUIRED TO BE ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 2-5). ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 6.)SEPARATE PERMITS WILL BE REQUIRED; INFORMATIONAL |
| | ONLY (SIGNS, ETC.). |
| | |
| | 7.-8.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 9.)SEE C7, TYPICAL PARKING DETAIL.THE DETAIL STATES |
| | THAT THE SURFACE WILL COMPLY WITH FIGURE 40(A) AND (B), |
| | BUT SEE OTHER COMMENTS REGARDING TACTILE SURFACE. |
| | GROOVES ARE NOT PERMITTED OUTDOORS, AND ADA TITLE III |
| | REQUIRES TRUNCATED DOMES, ADA 4.1.3. |
| | |
| | 10-11.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 12.)THE REAR DOOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE AN |
| | ACCESSIBLE EXIT FBC11-4.1.3(9).PLEASE SHOW ACCESSIBLE |
| | MEANS OF EGRESS, FBC11-3 (SHOW MAXIMUM SLOPE FROM DOOR |
| | TO PUBLIC WAY, WIDTH OF SIDEWALK BETWEEN REAR DOOR AND |
| | LOADING AREA AT NORTH SIDE). |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW - NOT ADDRESSED.IT IS NOT CLEAR WHERE |
| | ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK IS LOCATED, IF ANY.NONE |
| | SHOWN ON SHEET 1 PREPARED BY LAND DESIGN SOUTH, BUT |
| | THIS IS NOT SHOWN FOR THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING ACCESS |
| | AISLE EITHER.THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE ACCESS AISLE TO |
| | SIDEWALK CHANGE IN ELEVATION REQUIREMENT IS COMMON |
| | KNOWLEDGE, BUT THE REQUIREMENT OF ACCESSIBILITY TO THE |
| | PUBLIC WAY MAY NOT BE.PLEASE SHOW ON THE PLANS AS |
| | REQUESTED.SHEET A1 IS NOT CLEAR; WHAT ARE THE DASHED |
| | LINES?I CANNOT DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE CONCRETE |
| | IS CONTINUOUS, OR IF THE DASHED LINES REPRESENT A CURB |
| | WITH A CHANGE IN ELEVATION EXCEEDING THAT PERMITTED BY |
| | FBC11-3. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW, LAND DESIGN SOUTH SHEETS HAVE BEEN REMOVED |
| | AND THE COMMENT IS STILL NOT ADDRESSED.SEE THE REAR |
| | EXIT DOOR.THERE SHOULD BE A CURB RAMP SO THAT |
| | DISABLED INDIVIDUALS CAN GET AWAY FROM THE BUILDING. |
| | SEE SHEET C4, NONE SHOWN.THERE SHOULD BE AN |
| | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE PUBLIC WAY, BUT THIS APPEARS TO |
| | BE FULLY LANDSCAPED WITH CURBS, SEE THE SOUTH PROPERTY |
| | LINE. |
| | |
| | IT IS NOT CLEAR WHICH DESIGNER, IF ANY, IS RESPONSIBLE |
| | FOR THE ACCESSIBILITY TO THE SITE.THE ARCHITECT?S |
| | RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT |
| | WILL SHOW THIS ON THEIR PLAN.IS THE NEW LANDSCAPE |
| | ARCHITECT, DAVE BODKER, AWARE THAT HIS PLAN IS BEING |
| | USED TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE FOR FLORIDA AND FEDERAL |
| | ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS?IT APPEARS THAT HIS PLAN |
| | IS FOR TREES AND SHRUBS, NOTHING RELATED TO |
| | ACCESSIBILITY WAS SHOWN.THE CIVIL ENGINEER?S TITLE |
| | BLOCK STATES THAT THEY ALSO DO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE; |
| | IS THIS THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PLAN THE ARCHITECT IS |
| | REFERRING TO? |
| | |
| | 13.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 14.) PROVIDE A SITE PLAN SHOWING DISTANCE BETWEEN THE |
| | BUILDINGS AND LOCATION OF THIS BUILDING ON THE LOT. THE |
| | SITE PLAN PREVIOUSLY IN THE PACKAGE HAS BEEN REMOVED, |
| | NEW SITE PLAN DOES NOT HAVE ALL OF THE REQUIRED |
| | DIMENSIONS. |
| | |
| | 15-16.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 17.)FOR THE FLAT ROOF, SELECT AN APPROVED ASSEMBLY. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW; YOU ARE REQUESTING A ROOF PERMIT.THIS |
| | INFORMATION IS REQUIRED SO THAT CODE COMPLIANCE CAN BE |
| | DETERMINED.THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES "SEE ATTACHED |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL INFORMATION SHEETS."NOTHING WAS |
| | PROVIDED AND THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY (CHOICES LOCATED |
| | BETWEEN SHEETS 7 THROUGH 18 OF THE NOA) WAS NOT |
| | SELECTED. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW, ARCHITECT?S RESPONSE IS THAT THIS WILL BE |
| | DONE BY THE ROOFING CONTRACTOR.IF THIS IS NOT DONE |
| | PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, THE ROOF PERMIT ASSIGNED TO |
| | THIS PROJECT WILL BE VOIDED AND THE ROOF CONTRACTOR |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPLY FOR SEPARATE PERMIT WITH THE |
| | REQUIRED INFORMATION.THIS WILL NOT DELAY PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE OF THE MAIN BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 18.)FOR THE FLAT ROOF, SPECIFY ENHANCED FASTENING FOR |
| | CORNER AND PERIMETER ZONES.THIS MUST BE PREPARED BY |
| | AN ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, OR REGISTERED ROOF CONSULTANT |
| | AS PER GENERAL LIMITATION 7 ON THE NOA. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW, ARCHITECT?S RESPONSE IS THAT THIS WILL BE |
| | DONE BY THE ROOFING CONTRACTOR.IF THIS IS NOT DONE |
| | PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, THE ROOF PERMIT ASSIGNED TO |
| | THIS PROJECT WILL BE VOIDED AND THE ROOF CONTRACTOR |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPLY FOR SEPARATE PERMIT WITH THE |
| | REQUIRED INFORMATION.THIS WILL NOT DELAY PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE OF THE MAIN BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 19.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 20.)ON THE ROOF TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL, MARK METHOD OF |
| | ATTACHMENT.IF YOU ARE USING A FOAM ADHESIVE, PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS, FAC9B72. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW - THIS INFORMATION IS REQUIRED AT THIS TIME |
| | AS YOUR ROOFER HAS SIGNED ON AND A ROOF PERMIT HAS BEEN |
| | ASSIGNED.IF YOU WOULD LIKE, PLEASE REMOVE THIS, |
| | CANCEL THE PERMIT THROUGH THE FRONT COUNTER WHEN |
| | RESUBMITTING, AND THE ROOFING CONTRACTOR CAN APPLY FOR |
| | A SUBCONTRACTOR PERMIT WITH ALL OF THE REQUIRED |
| | INFORMATION.PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO REMAIN IN THE |
| | PACKAGE. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW, ARCHITECT?S RESPONSE IS THAT THIS WILL BE |
| | DONE BY THE ROOFING CONTRACTOR.IF THIS IS NOT DONE |
| | PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, THE ROOF PERMIT ASSIGNED TO |
| | THIS PROJECT WILL BE VOIDED AND THE ROOF CONTRACTOR |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPLY FOR SEPARATE PERMIT WITH THE |
| | REQUIRED INFORMATION.THIS WILL NOT DELAY PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE OF THE MAIN BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 21-23.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 24.)THE ADDRESS FOR THE ENGINEER, RICHARD ADAMS PE, |
| | CONFLICTS WITH DBPR WEBSITE. |
| | PLEASE CORRELATE. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED.PLEASE ADVISE AS TO HOW |
| | THIS WILL BE RESOLVED. |
| | |
| | 25.)PLEASE KEEP THE IMPACT FEE STAMP AND RECEIPT IN |
| | THE PERMIT PACKAGE. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER |
| | INDICATING HOW ALL COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.ONLY |
| | EIGHT OUT OF 22 COMMENTS WERE INCLUDED IN THE RESPONSE |
| | LETTER.OTHER COMMENTS CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH A LETTER |
| | FROM THE CONTRACTOR OR OTHER PARTY FAMILIAR WITH THE |
| | PROJECT IF THE ARCHITECT IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE |
| | OTHER ITEMS.NOTE THAT SEVERAL ITEMS WERE NOT |
| | ADDRESSED.PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | NOTE THAT NEW PLANS WERE SUBMITTED, CIVIL SHEETS, IN |
| | PLACE OF LAND DESIGN SOUTH. |
| | |
| | 26. REGARDING THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS ON THE PLAN |
| | FBC11-4.29, SEE ADA 4.29.2* DETECTABLE WARNINGS ON |
| | WALKING SURFACES. DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL CONSIST OF |
| | RAISED TRUNCATED DOMES WITH A DIAMETER OF NOMINAL 0.9 |
| | IN (23 MM), A HEIGHT OF NOMINAL 0.2 IN (5 MM) AND A |
| | CENTER-TO-CENTER SPACING OF NOMINAL 2.35 IN (60 MM) AND |
| | SHALL CONTRAST VISUALLY WITH ADJOINING SURFACES, EITHER |
| | LIGHT-ON-DARK, OR DARK-ON-LIGHT. |
| | |
| | A. REVISE CONCRETE SIDEWALK CURB RAMP DETAIL, SHEET C8. |
| | HTTP://WWW.ACCESS-BOARD.GOV/ADAAG/DWS/UPDATE.HTM. |
| | TACTILE SURFACE SHOWN, PLEASE REVISE DETAIL TO SHOW |
| | TRUNCATED DOMES. |
| | |
| | B. REVISE CONCRETE SIDEWALK CURB RAMP DETAIL, SHEET C8, |
| | TO SHOW THE VISUAL CONTRAST REQUIRED.IF THE DESIGN |
| | INTENT AND COMPLIANCE ARE NOT CLEAR, CALCULATIONS PER |
| | ADA4.29.2 MAY BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | C. NOTE THAT THE DETAIL STATES THAT IT IS TO CONFORM TO |
| | FDOT STANDARD 304, BUT THE DETAIL ON THE PLAN IS |
| | OUTDATED.PLEASE SEE THE CURRENT DETAIL, |
| | HTTP://WWW.DOT.STATE.FL.US/RDDESIGN/PUBLICATIONS/PUB.HT |
| | M.NOTE THAT THE CURRENT STANDARD ALSO REQUIRES |
| | TRUNCATED DOMES.PER RASIK CHOKSHI, CITY OF WEST PALM |
| | BEACH ENGINEERING SERVICES, PLEASE CHECK ALL DETAILS AT |
| | IT APPEARS THAT OTHER DETAILS ARE OUTDATED (DATED 2004 |
| | AND 2006). |
| | |
| | D. C4, SIDEWALK FROM THE FRONT DOOR GOING SOUTH, THERE |
| | SHOULD BE A DETECTABLE WARNING ON THE WEST SIDE WHERE |
| | THE SIDEWALK CROSSES THE PARKING LOT.A DETECTABLE |
| | WARNING IS SHOWN ON THE EAST SIDE OF THIS CROSSING BUT |
| | NOT THE WEST SIDE. |
| | |
| | E. C4, A DETECTABLE WARNING IS SHOWN ON THE SIDEWALK AT |
| | THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING ACCESS AISLE AND NO CURB RAMP |
| | SHOWN (THERE IS A NOTE STATING THAT IT WILL NOSE DOWN). |
| | PLEASE REVISE.NOTE THAT DETECTABLE WARNING AT A |
| | SIDEWALK WHERE IT DOES NOT CROSS TRAFFIC IS CONFUSING. |
| | THIS SHOULD BE A PART OF THE CURB RAMP ONLY. |
| | |
| | F. PLEASE NOTE THAT DETECTABLE WARNINGS WERE PREVIOUSLY |
| | ENFORCED IN THE FIELD.TO AVOID INSPECTION ISSUES, ALL |
| | REQUIRED DETECTABLE WARNINGS FOR THE SITE AND FOR THE |
| | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE ARE TO BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN AT THE |
| | TIME OF ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | 27.)PLEASE HAVE THE ARCHITECT CERTIFY THE ENERGY |
| | CALCS, FBC13-103.1.1.1. |
| | |
| | 28.)REGARDING EXITING ISSUES, PLEASE SEE FBC1023.6 AS |
| | WELL AS THE DEFINITIONS FOR EXIT DISCHARGE AND PUBLIC |
| | WAY.PLANS DO NOT CURRENTLY SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE, SEE |
| | OTHER COMMENTS.IS THERE A PERMANENT DEEDED ACCESS FOR |
| | THE SIDEWALK GOING TO THE WEST AND EVENTUALLY TO THE |
| | PUBLIC WAY?WHERE IS THE PUBLIC WAY IN RELATION TO THE |
| | LOTS?AS DISCUSSED, A COMPLETE SITE PLAN WILL BE |
| | SUBMITTED FOR PRELIMINARY BUILDING REVIEW PRIOR TO |
| | RESUBMITTAL OF THE PLANS. |
