| Date |
Text |
| 2008-02-06 10:18:26 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC* |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 FAC |
| | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FSFLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED: |
| | |
| | 1.)THIS IS AN AT RISK PERMIT (SHELL ONLY). |
| | INFORMATIONAL; NOT REQUIRED TO BE ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 2.)DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND |
| | SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, |
| | DATED ORIGINALS FS481.PLANS STATE THAT THIS IS |
| | "INFORMATIONAL ONLY" AND "PAD ONLY" BUT THIS SHEET IS |
| | USED TO DETERMINE CODE COMPLIANCE FOR ACCESSIBLE |
| | PARKING AND FBC CHAPTER 5; SEE OTHER COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 3.)STATE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND |
| | TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES FOR THIS PARCEL.NOTE |
| | THAT THE SITE PLAN STATES THAT THEREARE 176 TOTAL, 6 |
| | ACCESSIBLE WOULD BE REQUIRED BUT ONLY FIVE SHOWN, BUT |
| | IT APPEARS THAT THIS TOTAL IS FOR FOUR PARCELS.PLEASE |
| | SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC11-4.1.2(5)(A). |
| | |
| | 2ND REVEW - THE SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR PARKING IS |
| | SHOWN ON SHEET 1 PREPARED BYLAND DESIGN SOUTH.THE |
| | INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR PARCEL 4 IS CODE COMPLIANT. |
| | HOWEVER, SEE COMMENT 2 ABOVE.IF THIS UNSEALED SHEET |
| | IS REMOVED, SOMETHING MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE PERMIT |
| | PACKAGE TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE WITH ACCESSIBILITY |
| | REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 4.)PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SURVEY FOR THIS PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW - IF REQUIRED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, THE |
| | SURVEY IS TO BE A SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGNAL.NO |
| | SURVEY WAS SUBMITTED.TWO SETS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 5.)PROVIDE A SOILS INVESTIGATION REPORT, FBC1802.2. |
| | |
| | 6.)SEPARATE PERMITS WILL BE REQUIRED; INFORMATIONAL |
| | ONLY (SIGNS, ETC.). |
| | |
| | 7.-8.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 9.)SEE ZONING COMMENTS REGARDING PARKING STRIPING |
| | DETAIL. |
| | |
| | 10-11.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 12.)THE REAR DOOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE AN |
| | ACCESSIBLE EXIT FBC11-4.1.3(9).PLEASE SHOW ACCESSIBLE |
| | MEANS OF EGRESS, FBC11-3 (SHOW MAXIMUM SLOPE FROM DOOR |
| | TO PUBLIC WAY, WIDTH OF SIDEWALK BETWEEN REAR DOOR AND |
| | LOADING AREA AT NORTH SIDE). |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW - NOT ADDRESSED.IT IS NOT CLEAR WHERE |
| | ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK IS LOCATED, IF ANY.NONE |
| | SHOWN ON SHEET 1 PREPARED BY LAND DESIGN SOUTH, BUT |
| | THIS IS NOT SHOWN FOR THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING ACCESS |
| | AISLE EITHER.THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE ACCESS AISLE TO |
| | SIDEWALK CHANGE IN ELEVATION REQUIREMENT IS COMMON |
| | KNOWLEDGE, BUT THE REQUIREMENT OF ACCESSIBILITY TO THE |
| | PUBLIC WAY MAY NOT BE.PLEASE SHOW ON THE PLANS AS |
| | REQUESTED.SHEET A1 IS NOT CLEAR; WHAT ARE THE DASHED |
| | LINES?I CANNOT DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE CONCRETE |
| | IS CONTINUOUS, OR IF THE DASHED LINES REPRESENT A CURB |
| | WITH A CHANGE IN ELEVATION EXCEEDING THAT PERMITTED BY |
| | FBC11-3. |
| | |
| | 13.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 14.) ON THE SITE PLAN, SHOW THE DISTANCE TO THE |
| | PROPERTY LINES, INCLUDING THE DISTANCE FROM THE |
| | BUILDING TO THE ASSUMED LOT LINE.THIS APPEARS TO BE |
| | 5'.SEE FBC TABLE 602 AND SHOW COMPLIANCE ON THE PLAN. |
| | ANY REQUIRED FIRE RATED WALLS ARE TO BE NOTED ON BOTH |
| | THE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN AND THE MECHANICAL PLAN.IF |
| | FIRE RATED WALLS ARE REQUIRED BY FBC TABLE 602 (OR |
| | OTHER CODE REQUIREMENTS) PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL; |
| | TESTED ASSEMBLY OR CALCULATED FIRE RESISTANCE FBC 7. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW - THE ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE LETTER STATES: |
| | THE ASSUMED LOT LINE WAS AN ARBITRARY LINE, AND WE HAVE |
| | REMOVED IT ON THE REVISED SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | A REVISED SITE PLAN WAS NOT SUBMITTED; SAME INFORMATION |
| | WAS PROVIDED SHOWING THE BUILDING LOCATED 5' TO THE |
| | "ASSUMED LOT LINE" TO THE EAST.ALSO, ON SHEET A2, THE |
| | ARCHITECT STATES THAT THE EAST WALL IS 5' FROM THE |
| | PROPERTY LINE WITH UNLIMITED OPENINGS ALLOWED.NOTE |
| | THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | A.IN MY CONVERATION WITH THE ARCHITECT'S OFFICE, I |
| | WAS INFORMED THAT THIS IS A LEASE LINE.NOTE THAT |
| | LEASE LINES ARE NOT ADDRESSED IN THE BUILDING CODE AND |
| | THEREFORE DO NOT HAVE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS. |
| | HOWEVER, SEE FBC704.3 REGARDING BUILDINGS LOCATED ON |
| | THE SAME LOT.THE LINE IS NOT AN ARBITRARY LINE; IT IS |
| | TO BE DETERMINED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND IS |
| | REQUIRED TO BE CODE COMPLIANT WITH CODES PREVIOUSLY |
| | REFERENCED.NOT ONLY IS THIS BUILDING TO COMPLY WITH |
| | THESE REQUIREMENTS, BUT BY CREATING A NEW ASSUMED |
| | PROPERTY LINE, THE ADJACENT BUILDING IS ALSO TO BE |
| | COMPLIANT (CANNOT CREATE A SITUATION WHERE A COMPLIANT |
| | BUILDING IS MADE NONCOMPLIANT). |
| | |
| | B.SEE FBC TABLE 602; 1 HOUR EXTERIOR WALL REQUIRED ON |
| | THE EAST SIDE BASED ON INFORMATION DECLARED BY |
| | ARCHITECT. |
| | |
| | C.SEE FBC TABLE 704.8; NO OPENINGS PERMITTED.NOTE |
| | THAT FOOTNOTE 6 DOES NOT APPLY AS, DUE TO THE 1 HOUR |
| | REQUIREMENT FBC TABLE 602. |
| | |
| | PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU NEED ASSISTANCE IN RESOLVING |
| | THIS MATTER. |
| | |
| | 15.)SEE FBC TABLE 704.8 REGARDING ALLOWABLE OPENINGS |
| | AND SHOW COMPLIANCE ON THE PLAN (EAST SIDE AND OTHER |
| | BUILDING ELEVATIONS LESS THAN 30').NOTE THAT IF THE |
| | BUILDING IS 5? FROM THE ASSUMED LOT LINE AS SHOWN, ALL |
| | OPENINGS ARE TO BE PROTECTED.IF ANY OPENING |
| | PROTECTION IS REQUIRED, NOTE ON PLAN AND SUBMIT PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS AND FIRE RATING INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, SEE ITEM 14. |
| | |
| | 16.) PLEASE NOTE FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION ON THE PLAN |
| | AND, IF IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA, MINIMUM FFE |
| | (REQUIRED TO BE 6" ABOVE BFE) IS REQUIRED TO BE SHOWN |
| | ON THE PLAN CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE |
| | 94-546(B)). |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, DESIGN PROFESSIONAL (ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER) |
| | IS TO DETERMINE HEIGHT OF FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION FOR |
| | THIS PROJECT.THERE IS A HANDWRITTEN NOTE ON THE |
| | ENGINEERING COMMENT LIST STATING THAT THE INFORMATION |
| | IS IN ANOTHER PERMIT.THIS PERMIT IS SEPARATE FROM THE |
| | PERMIT REFERENCED, AND THIS PERMIT IS TO SHOW CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE.AS PER FEMA REQUIREMENTS, A FORM BOARD |
| | ELEVATION CERTIFICATE WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE CONCRETE |
| | POUR.THE REQUIRED ELEVATION IS TO BE SHOWN ON THE |
| | PLAN FOR THIS PERMIT.EVEN IF THE SITEWORK PERMIT |
| | ADDRESSED THE ELEVATION FOR THIS BUILIDNG, IT IS |
| | UNLIKELY THAT THIS WILL BE AVAILABLE TO THE INSPECTOR |
| | WHEN HE DOES THE INSPECTION ON THIS PERMIT.NOTE THAT |
| | THIS REQUIREMENT AFFECTS THE CITY'S COMMUNITY RATING |
| | WITH FEMA AND THE RATES WHICH PROPERTY OWNERS PAY FOR |
| | FLOOD INSURANCE.THIS IS REQUIRED TO BE ON THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | |
| | 17.)FOR THE FLAT ROOF, SELECT AN APPROVED ASSEMBLY. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW; YOU ARE REQUESTING A ROOF PERMIT.THIS |
| | INFORMATION IS REQUIRED SO THAT CODE COMPLIANCE CAN BE |
| | DETERMINED.THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES "SEE ATTACHED |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL INFORMATION SHEETS."NOTHING WAS |
| | PROVIDED AND THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY (CHOICES LOCATED |
| | BETWEEN SHEETS 7 THROUGH 18 OF THE NOA) WAS NOT |
| | SELECTED. |
| | |
| | 18.)FOR THE FLAT ROOF, SPECIFY ENHANCED FASTENING FOR |
| | CORNER AND PERIMETER ZONES.THIS MUST BE PREPARED BY |
| | AN ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, OR REGISTERED ROOF CONSULTANT |
| | AS PER GENERAL LIMITATION 7 ON THE NOA. |
| | |
| | 19.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 20.)ON THE ROOF TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL, MARK METHOD OF |
| | ATTACHMENT.IF YOU ARE USING A FOAM ADHESIVE, PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS, FAC9B72. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW - THIS INFORMATION IS REQUIRED AT THIS TIME |
| | AS YOUR ROOFER HAS SIGNED ON AND A ROOF PERMIT HAS BEEN |
| | ASSIGNED.IF YOU WOULD LIKE, PLEASE REMOVE THIS, |
| | CANCEL THE PERMIT THROUGH THE FRONT COUNTER WHEN |
| | RESUBMITTING, AND THE ROOFING CONTRACTOR CAN APPLY FOR |
| | A SUBCONTRACTOR PERMIT WITH ALL OF THE REQUIRED |
| | INFORMATION.PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO REMAIN IN THE |
| | PACKAGE. |
| | |
| | 21-22.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 23.)BOTH THE ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER HAS SPECIFIED |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES FOR COMPONENTS AND CLADDING, BUT THE |
| | PRESSURES SHOWN ON A6 APPEAR TOO LOW FOR THIS WIND ZONE |
| | AND CONFLICT WITH S0.2.PLEASE PROVIDE ONLY ONE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURE CRITERIA.IF YOU USE THE PRESSURES ON A6, |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 24.)THE ADDRESS FOR THE ENGINEER, RICHARD ADAMS PE, |
| | CONFLICTS WITH DBPR WEBSITE.PLEASE CORRELATE. |
| | |
| | 25.)PLEASE KEEP THE IMPACT FEE STAMP AND RECEIPT IN |
| | THE PERMIT PACKAGE. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER |
| | INDICATING HOW ALL COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.ONLY |
| | EIGHT OUT OF 22 COMMENTS WERE INCLUDED IN THE RESPONSE |
| | LETTER.OTHER COMMENTS CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH A LETTER |
| | FROM THE CONTRACTOR OR OTHER PARTY FAMILIAR WITH THE |
| | PROJECT IF THE ARCHITECT IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE |
| | OTHER ITEMS.NOTE THAT SEVERAL ITEMS WERE NOT |
| | ADDRESSED.PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS. |
