| Date |
Text |
| 2008-01-02 17:02:01 | RESIDENTIAL ADDITION, BUILDING REVIEW SECOND |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | REVIEW UNDER FBC 2004 WITH 2007 REVISIONS. |
| | |
| | 1-SECOND FLOOR PLAN SPECIFIES THEGUEST BEDROOM |
| | CENTER WINDOW AS THE EGRESS WINDOW,WHILE EXTERIOR |
| | SOUTH ELEVATION SPECIFIES THE SIDE WINDOWS AS THE |
| | EGRESS WINDOWS.CLARIFY WHICH ONE IS THE EGRESS |
| | WINDOW. |
| | |
| | 2- PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS/DETAILS FOR |
| | FIREBLOCKING IN THE WALL SECTIONS.FIREBLOCKING IS NOT |
| | ONLY REQUIRED BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR, BUT |
| | BETWEEN TOP WALL AND CEILING AS WELL. SEC. R602..1.2 OF |
| | 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.PROVIDE INFORMATION AS |
| | REQUIRED. (REPEAT COMMENT. COMMENT PARTIALLY |
| | ADDRESSED). |
| | |
| | 3-SPECIFY CEILING FAN SIZES IN ALL ROOMS AS REQUIRED |
| | BY TABLE 13-607.1.A.1 FBC 2004 SINCE ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS ARE TAKEN THE CEILING FANS CREDIT. (REPEAT |
| | COMMENT). |
| | |
| | 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE |
| | 9B-72 FOR: |
| | A) OPERABLEWINDOWS FOR DOUBLE AND SINGLE CASEMENT |
| | WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON PLANS.PRODUCT APPROVALNOA |
| | 07-0524.06 SUBMITTED DOESN'T COVER THESE WINDOWS. |
| | B) EXTERIORSWING DOOR AT MUD ROOM AS SHOWN ON |
| | EXTERIOR SOUTH ELEVATION. ONLY PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR |
| | FRENCH DOORS WAS SUBMITTED. |
| | C) ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS. PROVIDE 2 |
| | COPIES ONLY ONE WAS SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 5- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.THERE ARE SOME PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS WHICH ONLYONE COPY WAS SIGNED OFF AS |
| | REVIEWED AND APPROVED.PLEASE RESUBMIT COMPLETE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS PACKAGE.ALSO,WRITE THE NAME OF |
| | ARCHITECT REVIEWING THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. SEC. 106..3.3 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 6- REVISED PLANS SPECIFY ICYNENE INSULATION NOW. |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETELISTING AND MANUFACTURER'S SPECS TO |
| | VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITHSECTION R314 OF 2004 FLORIDA |
| | RESIDENTIAL CODE. AND TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | SPECIFIED R-VALUE OF R-30. ALSO, ARCHITECT TO |
| | COORDINATE WITH ENERGY CALCULATIONS PRIOR TO |
| | SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 7-SHEET 7:REVISE EMBEDMENT SPECIFIED FOR 5" ANCHOR |
| | BOLTS THRU 3X8 LEDGER.IT CAN'T BE 3 1/2" EMBEDMENT. |
| | |
| | 8-SHEET 8: REVISE HEADROOM CLEARANCE IN SECTION 1/8. |
| | SEE SEC.R311.5.2 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE TO |
| | CHECK PROPER WAY OF PROVIDING DIMENSION.ANDPROVIDE |
| | DIMENSION INFEET AND INCHES. |
| | |
| | 9- SHEET 10: REVISE DESIGN DATA NOTE #2. SEE SEC. |
| | R606.4 FOR MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRESS REQUIRED FOR |
| | CONCRETE BLOCK.(REPEAT COMMENT).ENGINEER CAN'T |
| | LOWER THE MINIMUMCOMPRESSIVE STRESS REQUIRED BY THE |
| | CODE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 10- NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WAS NOT SUBMITTED THIS TIME. |
| | THIS LEGAL DOCUMENT NEEDS TO BE SIGNED BY THE OWNER. |
| | OTHERWISE, PROVIDE LEGAL DOCUMENTATION AND FLORIDA |
| | STATUTE SECTIONTHAT ALLOWS THE CONTRACTOR TO SIGN IT |
| | ON BEHALF OF THE OWNER. |
| | |
| | 11- PERMIT APPLICATION IS MISSING THE SECOND PAGE. |
| | PROVIDECOMPLETE PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 12-PERMIT VALUATION WAS UPDATED ONCE THAT AREA |
| | TABULATION WAS PROVIDED IN THE PLANS. OWES $934.73 FOR |
| | PERMIT VALUATION AND RADON FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 108.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
