| Date |
Text |
| 2007-11-08 15:37:36 | |
| | |
| | |
| | THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES: |
| | |
| | THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2006 REVISIONS, 2004 |
| | RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE, 2005 NEC, NFPA-72 2002, |
| | NFPA-101 2003, 2004 FBC AS AMENDED, CHAPTER 1.AND FOUND |
| | NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: |
| | |
| | 1} PROVIDE A LOAD CALCULATION FOR THE LOAD INTENDED TO |
| | BE SERVED. 215.5. 702.5, 2005NEC ANDPROVIDE A PANEL |
| | SCHEDULE FOR THE GENERATOR PANEL. 106.3.5.4 FBC AS |
| | AMENDED. LOAD CALCULATIONS AND PANEL SCHEDULES WERE |
| | SUBMITTED FOR TWO PANELS, CLARIFY THE PANEL THE |
| | GENERATOR WILL FEED. SEE SCHEDULES AND RISER DIAGRAM. * |
| | THE GENERATOR SPECS HAVE THE OUTPUT AT 75 AMPS. BOTH |
| | PANEL SCHEDULES/ LOAD CALCS, ARE HIGHER AMPERAGE THAN |
| | TH OUTPUT OF THE GENSET. IT IS THE DETERMINATION OF |
| | THIS OFFICE THAT LOADS BEING TRANSFERRED AUTOMATICALLY |
| | ARE THE LOADS SELECTED UNDER ARTICLE 702.5. UTILITY |
| | POWER CAN BE DISRUPTED AT ANY TIME, POSSIBLY IN THE |
| | OWNERS ABSENCE. THEREFORE ALL CONNECTED LOADS WILL BE |
| | ENERGIZED AS THERE IS NO ONE TO "SELECT" WHICH CIRCUITS |
| | WILL BE ENERGIZED. HOW ARE LOADS BEING SHED. THERE ARE |
| | STILL NO GENERATOR PANELS SUBMITTED AIS SHOWN ON THE |
| | RISER DIAGRAM |
| | |
| | 2} PLEASE LOCATE ALL SERVICE AND GENERATOR EQUIPMENT ON |
| | A SITE PLAN, NOT THE SURVEY, METER ENCLOSURE, |
| | DISCONNECTS, ATS AND PANELS, SO THAT COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | ARTICLES 225 AND 230 CAN BE REVIEWED.* ONLY THE |
| | GENERATOR IS ON THE SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 3} PROVIDE MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | GENERATOR INDICATING RECOMMENDED SETBACKS FROM |
| | STRUCTURES |
| | * COULD NOT FIND THE SETBACK RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE |
| | DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. |
| | |
| | BILL TROBAUGH |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| | 561/805-6718 |
