| Date |
Text |
| 2007-10-24 07:51:46 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC* |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | |
| | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FSFLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | 1.ENGINEER SPECIFIES A SYSTEM WHICH REFERS TO GENERAL |
| | LIMITATION #9.SEE NOA, NO ENHANCED FASTENING ALLOWED; |
| | THE SYSTEM IS LIMITED TO -52.5. |
| | |
| | 2.ENGINEER HAS SPECIFIED 9 FASTENERS FOR ZONE 3 AND |
| | ZONE 1.IF 9 IS THE NUMBER NEEDED FOR -52.5 PSF, HOW |
| | COULD THAT BE SUFFICIENT FOR -114.9PSF? |
| | |
| | 3.ENGINEER HAS SPECIFIED 9 FASTENERS FOR ZONE 1.THE |
| | NOA STATES THAT THERE SHOULD BE ONE PER 3.2 SQUARE |
| | FEET.FOR A 32SF BOARD, THAT SHOULD BE 10 FASTENERS |
| | (32/3.2=10), NOT 9.WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE SUBMIT |
| | CALCULATIONS TO SHOW HOW YOU HAVE ARRIVED AT THE |
| | FASTENING PATTERNS FOR ZONES 1 AND 3.IT IS UNCLEAR |
| | HOW YOU HAVE DETERMINED THE FASTENING WHICH IS IN |
| | CONFLICT WITH THE NOA. |
| | |
| | 4.WHEN RESUBMITTING, ENGINEER IS TO PROVIDE AN |
| | EXPLANATION AS TO HOW HE HAD ARRIVED AT DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES FROM FIRST REVIEW AND FASTENING PATTERNS FROM |
| | SECOND REVIEW (JUSTIFICATION FOR SIGNED, SEALED, DATED |
| | ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED). |
| | |
| | A SET HAS BEEN RETAINED.WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE |
| | SUBMIT TWO COMPLETE SETS OF PERMIT DOCUMENTS (INCLUDING |
| | TWO NOAS). |
