| Date |
Text |
| 2008-11-24 08:23:49 | |
| | |
| | |
| | ** FAILED RESUBMITTED PLAN REVIEW ** |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PERMIT APPLICATION HAS STILL NOT BEEN MADE. |
| | PLANS SUBMITTED FOR *PLAN REVIEW** |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: ON PREVIOUS REVIEWS THERE WERE PLANS SUBMITTED |
| | WHICH CONTAINED A *RUBBER STAMP* FOR THE ENGINEER IN |
| | LIEU OF THE REQUIRED ORIGINAL SIGNATURE PER FS 471.025 |
| | AND FAC 61G15-23.002. THIS COMMENT HAS BEEN MADE TO |
| | THIS SAME ENGINEER ON MANY PROJECTS AND ON THIS SAME |
| | PROJECT ON PREVIOUS REVIEWS FOR BOTH BUILDINGS. |
| | RESPONSE MENTIONS PLANS WILL BE SIGNED DATED AND SEALED |
| | HOWEVER THE NEW SHEETS NOW SUBMITTED DO NOT CONTAIN AN |
| | ORIGINAL SIGNATURE. THIS IS NOT PERMITTED ANYWHERE IN |
| | THE STATE OF FLORIDA. |
| | CONTACT WITH THE FLORIDA BOARD OF ENGINEERS HAS BEEN |
| | MADE AND PLANS WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE STATE WITH ALL |
| | PREVIOUS RETAINED PLANS FOR THE REVIEW. TWO COMPLETE |
| | SETS OF ELECTRICLA PLANS HAVE BEEN RETAINED AS |
| | REQUESTED BY THE STATE. WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE |
| | BE SURE TO PROVIDE NEW SETS OF ELECTRICAL PLANS. |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE SUBMITTED INPUT DATA REPORT FOR |
| | THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEEDS TO COORDINATE WITH PLANS. |
| | SOME EXAMPLES WERE GIVEN ON EACH OF THE PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEWS HOWEVER ITEMS ARE STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. |
| | PLANS NEED TO BE REVISED OR REVISE CALCULATIONS. IN |
| | EITHER CASE THE CALCULATIONS NEED TO MEET |
| | 13-415.400.3.A, 13-415.2,13-415.2.ABC.1.1,.1.2 AND |
| | .1.3. |
| | THERE ARE OTHER COMPONENTS AND SYSTEMS WHICH ALSO NEED |
| | COORDINATION. SEE COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES WITH |
| | RESPECT TO OTHER SYSTEMS/COMPONENTS IN THE IDR WHICH |
| | ARE NOT THE SAME ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | THE EXAMPLES ON PREVIOUS REVIEWS FOR NON-CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE WERE ?EXAMPLES? AND REVIEW STATED IT WAS IN |
| | NO WAY ALL ITEMS. THIS OFFICE IS REQUIRED TO STATE THE |
| | CODE SECTIONS. AS A BENEFIT THIS OFFICE GIVES SOME |
| | ITEMS TO HELP UNDERSTAND THE CODE COMPLIANCE ISSUE |
| | WHICH IS OUTSTANDING TO BE ADDRESSED. |
| | IN MEETINGS HELD BEFORE PLANS WERE RE-SUBMITTED THIS |
| | REVIEWER OFFERED SEVERAL TIMES TO RESPONSIBLE DESIGNERS |
| | PRESENT TO CALL ONCE CALCULATIONS ARE BEING COMPLETED |
| | TO GO OVER *ANY* QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS. THIS WOULD HELP |
| | TO ALLEVIATE ANY FURTHER DELAYS UNNECESSARILY. TO DATE |
| | OF THIS REVIEWER HAS NOT BEEN CONTACTED SINCE THE |
| | MEETING. |
| | |
| | EXAMPLE: |
| | PLEASE SEE ITEMS SUCH AS *PIPING* ON THE IDR WHICH IS |
| | ACTUALLY BLANK. 13-411.1.ABC.2 PIPING INSULATION. |
| | |
| | EXAMPLE: |
| | PLEASE SEE OTHER ITEMS SUCH AS LIGHTING. THE SHEETS FOR |
| | EXAMPLE L-4.2 STILL SHOW LIGHTING FIXTURES WITH A MUCH |
| | HIGHER WATTAGE THAN WHAT IS SUPPOSE TO BE THE SAME |
| | FIXTURES ON THE ELECTRICAL PLANS. THE FACT IS THE SAME |
| | FIXTURES ON THE ELECTRICAL PLANS WHICH IS (Y1) IS |
| | 55WATTS ON THE IDR AND THE ELECTRICAL PLANS YET THE L |
| | SHEET INDICATES THIS SAME FIXTURE AS 120WATTS. IN THE |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW AS WELL AS MEETINGS IT WAS STATED TO |
| | COORDINATE ALL PLANS AND CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE THE SAME L-4.2 WHICH SHOWS A J1 |
| | BOLLARD WHICH NOT ON ELECTRICAL PLANS OR THE ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | EXAMPLE: PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE ALL *Y* TYPE FIXTURES |
| | SOME ARE LESS ON IDR THAN ON PLANS. MINOR DIFFERENCES |
| | ON THESE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | **IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP |
| | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE |
| | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. |
| | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY |
| | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, |
| | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC. SHOULD BE PLACED |
| | INTO TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS |
| | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID |
| | ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT |
| | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO |
| | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| 2008-11-21 17:04:15 | PLANS WILL GO INTO FAILED REVIEW STATUS. |
| | |
| | NOTES TO BE POSTED ON 11/24. NOTES PERTAINING TO PLANS |
| | NOT BE SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED AS REQUIRED WILL BE |
| | PART OF REVIEW ALONG WITH NOTES PERTAINING TO ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS. |
