| Date |
Text |
| 2008-10-10 15:15:20 | |
| | ** DENIED 4TH REVIEW** |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLANS STILL ONLY SUBMITTED FOR PLAN REVIEW AND |
| | NOT FOR PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | DO NOT COORDINATE WITH PLANS. THERE ARE SEVERAL |
| | INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE SQ FOOTAGE ETC. PLEASE SEE |
| | COMMENTS FOR OTHER TRADES FOR ITEMS SUCH AS FLOORING |
| | ETC. |
| | LS SAFETY PLANS FOR NEW BUILDING SHOW IN EXCESS OF |
| | 11,000 SQ FT, A-1000 STATES 10,000 SQ FT AS TOTAL |
| | BUILDING FOOT-PRINT YET THE CALCULATIONS STATE A TOTAL |
| | OF 8913. |
| | PLEASE BE SURE ALL LIGHTING AS SHOWN ON PLANS FOR TYPE |
| | OF FIXTURES, WATTAGE OF FIXTURES AND THE NUMBER OF |
| | FIXTURES COORDINATE WITH THE INPUT DATA REPORT OF THE |
| | SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS. |
| | FOR EXAMPLE: SEE EXTERIOR LIGHTING, SOME OF THE |
| | FIXTURES AS SHOWN ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING |
| | INCLUDING SITE ARE NOT ON THE IDR AT ALL. |
| | FOR EXAMPLE: ONE WOULD BE THE 175 WATT SITE LIGHTS. |
| | THERE ARE NO 175W FIXTURES ON THE IDR AT ALL. |
| | |
| | FOR EXAMPLE: ANOTHER WOULD BE THE *Y* FIXTURES. THESE |
| | ARE NOTED ON THE FIXTURE LEGEND AND ON PLANS IN MANY |
| | LOCATIONS. THE FIXTURE LEGEND MENTIONS TO SEE LANDSCAPE |
| | PLANS. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS CALLS FOR THESE SAME ITEMS |
| | AS BOLLARDS. ARE THEY BOLLARDS WITH LIGHTING FIXTURES? |
| | IF SO HOW IS IT POSSIBLE THAT THEY ARE SHOWN AS A *Y* |
| | FIXTURE WHEN THE SAME DESIGNATION IS USED FOR OTHER |
| | FIXTURES WHICH ARE CLEARLY NOT BOLLARDS? THE SHEET E-6 |
| | DOES SHOW BOLLARDS AS PART OF THE SCHEDULE. NO BOLLARDS |
| | ARE SHOWN ON FIXTURE LEGEND. COORDINATION, AND |
| | DESIGNATIONS IS NEEDED. |
| | ** COMPLETE LEGEND WITH FIXTURES. (((AS LONG AS PLANS |
| | COORDINATE AND SHOW A ***MINIMUM*** CODE COMPLIANCE |
| | THEY MAY ALWAYS BE REVISED AT A LATER DATE))). |
| | |
| | FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE THE IDR, THE AMOUNT OF *S* |
| | FIXTURES NEED COORDINATING. |
| | |
| | FOR EXAMPLE: AS NOTED ABOVE FOR THE *Y* FIXTURES WHICH |
| | ARE NOTED AS 50W/55W FIXTURES THE *U* FIXTURES ARE ALSO |
| | SHOWN AS 50W/55W FIXTURES. BETWEEN BOTH OF THESE |
| | FIXTURES WHICH ARE NOTED AS 50W/55W THERE SHOULD BE A |
| | NUMBER FIXTURE FAR GREATER THAN WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE |
| | IDR. IN FACT THE IDR ONLY INDICATES A TOTAL OF 27 -55W |
| | FIXTURES. THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE WHEN THE PLANS SHOW A |
| | FAR GREATER NUMBER OF *Y* AND *U* FIXTURES WHICH ARE |
| | THE SAME WATTAGE. THIS IS ACCORDING TO THE LIGHTING |
| | PLANS SUBMITTED SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED ON 9/28/08, |
| | THE FIXTURE LEGEND SIGNED DATED AND SEALED 6/26/08 AND |
| | CALCULATIONS SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED 9/29/08. |
| | |
| | FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE TAKE A LOOK AT THE LIGHTING FOR |
| | INTERIOR AND GO OVER ALL FIXTURES IN ALL |
| | ZONES/SPACES/AREAS. NOT ALL FIXTURES ARE IN CONFERENCE |
| | MEETING ROOMS ALTHOUGH IN THE SAME ZONE. *C*? |
| | |
| | 13-400.3.A, 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3. |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE WHICH GAVE |
| | INFORMATION TO THE FACT THE SITE LIGHTING POLES WERE |
| | NOTING SBCCI FOR DESIGN HOWEVER SBCCI HAS NOT BEEN AN |
| | ADOPTED CODE IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA SINCE MARCH 1ST OF |
| | 2002. SEE E-1 *PARKING LOT LIGHT POLE DETAIL*. THIS HAS |
| | BEEN CIRCLED ON PREVIOUS PLANS AS WELL ON THESE PLANS |
| | ONCE AGAIN. |
| | PLEASE SEE FBC 2004W/2007 REVISIONS AS ADOPTED BY FS |
| | 553.73. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: AS NOTED IN COMMENT NUMBER #2 ABOVE WITH |
| | RESPECT LIGHTING FIXTURES AND COORDINATION NEEDED. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING AS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS |
| | DOES NOT COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL OR ELECTRICAL DOES |
| | NOT COORDINATE WITH LANDSCAPE PLANS. THE ELECTRICAL |
| | PLANS CONTAIN NOTES TO SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS HOWEVER |
| | COORDINATION OF PLANS IS ESSENTIAL. |
| | LOADS, CALCULATIONS, ENERGY CALCULATION, CIRCUITING ETC |
| | ALL NEED TO BE VERIFIED SHOWING THE MINIMUM FOR CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE. |
| | 408.4,310.16,240.4, 220, ETC |
| | FBC 13-415 ETC |
| | FBC 106.1.1,106.1.2 FOR CLARITY, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
| | AND COORDINATION OF PLANS. |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: PLEASE COORDINATE ALL CIRCUITING ON PLANS WITH |
| | THE LIGHTING CONTROLS AND PANEL SCHEDULES. ONE EXAMPLE |
| | WHICH WAS THE SAME EXAMPLE GIVEN ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | IS CIRCUIT L4-36. THE PLANS SHOW THIS CIRCUIT FEEDING |
| | THE EXTERIOR LIGHTS YET THE PANEL SCHEDULE STILL SHOWS |
| | THIS CIRCUIT FEEDING A *PROJECTION SCREEN*. |
| | NO RESPONSE WAS MADE TO THIS PART OF THE PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW COMMENT AS AN EXAMPLE. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING CONTROLS AND TYPES OF |
| | DEVICE NEEDS SOME COORDINATION OF WHAT WILL BE |
| | INSTALLED AND REQUIRED. THE RESPONSE MENTIONS |
| | *PHOTO-SENSOR* FOR INTERIOR LIGHTING AND SHEET E-6 ALSO |
| | SHOWS *PHOTO-SENSOR*. |
| | DUAL TECHNOLOGY DEVICES FOR OCCUPANCY SENSORS AND |
| | PHOTO-SENSORS ARE NOT THE SAME. THE PREVIOUS NOTES GAVE |
| | SECTION 13-415.1.ABC.1.4 FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING AND |
| | METHODS OF CONTROLS. THE PLANS CALL FOR 10HR BACK UP OF |
| | INTERIOR LIGHTING HOWEVER THIS SECTION OF THE CODE |
| | WHICH WHEN USING A TIME CLOCK, REQUIRES THAT TIME CLOCK |
| | TO BE ASTRONOMICAL AND WITH A 10HR BACK UP MINIMUM FOR |
| | PROGRAMMING. IF USING A PHOTO-SENSOR (ALSO KNOWN AS A |
| | PHOTO-CELL) THE ASTRONOMICAL TIME CLOCK IS NOT REQUIRED |
| | NOR IS THE 10HR BACK UP. |
| | HOW CAN THESE BE NOTED A PHOTO-SENSORS? THIS IS NOT |
| | POSSIBLE. |
| | SYMBOL LEGEND CALLS FOR MOTION SENSORS. THERE ARE |
| | DEVICE WHICH ARE ONLY MOTION AND DO NOT CONTAIN THE |
| | MULTI-LEVEL DESIGN FOR DUAL TECHNOLOGY, ULTRASONIC, |
| | INFRARED ETC. |
| | LIGHTING CONTROL SYSTEM NEEDS MEET FBC |
| | 13-415.1.ABC.1.1,.1.2 AND .1.3. |
| | THE CONTROLS AND SYSTEM SHOWN ON PLANS IS CONFUSING AND |
| | AS SHOWN IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO BE A WORKING SYSTEM. |
| | |
| | ** LIGHTING SYSTEM IN RENOVATED BUILDING ALSO NEEDS TO |
| | BE GONE OVER. |
| | |
| | |
| | ** THIS IS THE THIRD REVIEW IN WHICH COMMENTS HAVE BEEN |
| | MADE ON THE LIGHTING SYSTEM. IT IS RECOMMENDED BY THIS |
| | OFFICE TO HAVE A MEETING TO GO OVER THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE: PLANS STILL NOTE THAT 8 COPIES OF SHOP |
| | DRAWINGS ARE REQUIRED AND 7 COPIES WILL BE STAMPED BY |
| | THE REVIEWER. THIS IS A THRESHOLD PROJECT ONLY THREE |
| | SETS ARE NEEDED AND ONLY THREE SETS WILL BE PROCESSED |
| | AND STAMPED. |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE: AS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW THE RENOVATED |
| | BUILDING SHALL CONTAIN A MAIN OR A PERMANENT DEAD FRONT |
| | WHICH WILL NOT PERMIT MORE THAN 6 BREAKERS TO BE |
| | INSTALLED. ONCE THE PHASE TWO WORK IS COMMENCED THIS |
| | MLO ONLY EQUIPMENT WILL HAVE A DISCONNECT AS SHOWN ON |
| | RISER FOR THE NEW BUILDING HOWEVER NEED TO HAVE SOME |
| | SORT OF DISCONNECT SHOWN AT THIS TIME FOR PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE. |
| | 225.31-225.39 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | **IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP |
| | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE |
| | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. |
| | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY |
| | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, |
| | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO |
| | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS |
| | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID |
| | ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | |
| | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT |
| | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO |
| | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
