| Date |
Text |
| 2008-07-17 16:56:51 | REVIEW #: 3RD. **PLAN REVIEW** |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS |
| | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AS WELL AS DESIGNER'S WRITTEN |
| | RESPONSES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUITY. |
| | |
| | 1. OK |
| | |
| | 2. SOME OF THE COMBINATION FIRE/SMOKE DAMPERS WHICH |
| | HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE CORRIDOR WALLS AT HALLWAY 152 |
| | ARE NOT SHOWN AT THE LOCATION OF THE RATED WALL |
| | ASSEMBLIES AS SHOWN ON PAGE LS-1.0. SOME ARE SHOWN AT A |
| | SOFFIT RATHER THAN BEING SET-BACK IN THE ALCOVE WHERE |
| | THE RATED WALL ASSEMBLY IS LOCATED. ALSO, HALL 165 IS |
| | SHOWN ON LS-1.0 AS BEING ON THE CORRIDOR SIDE OF THE |
| | RATED WALL ASSEMBLY. THE RESULT IS THERE ARE NO DAMPERS |
| | SHOWN ON PAGE M-2 WHERE THE DUCTS ACTUALLY PENETRATE |
| | THE RATED WALLS. PLEASE COORDINATE MECHANICAL PLANS |
| | WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND LIFE SAFETY PLANS TO SHOW DUCT |
| | PENETRATIONS LOCATED AT THE ACTUAL WALL ASSEMBLIES IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 607.5. |
| | |
| | 3 THROUGH 5: OK |
| | |
| | 6. IS THIS DESIGN WITH TEK (SHEET METAL) SCREWS INTO |
| | WOOD AND ONLY ATTACHING TO CORRUGATED DECKING INTENDED |
| | AND DESIGNED FOR WIND RESISTANCE? PLEASE CLARIFY AND |
| | COORDINATE WITH STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. ALSO, NO |
| | INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED REGARDING THE WIND RESISTANCE |
| | OF THE GREENHECK ROOF CAP. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBCM |
| | 301.13 AS STATED IN PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT #6. |
| | |
| | 7. OK PENDING BUILDING REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 8. OK |
| | |
| | 9A. OK |
| | |
| | 9B. OK |
| | |
| | 9C. THE IDR HAS BEEN CORRECTED FOR MECHANICAL ITEMS. |
| | HOWEVER, COOLING LOAD CALCULATION HAVE NOT BEEN |
| | ATTACHED TO THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY FBCB |
| | 13-407.1.ABC.1. |
| | NOTE: SOME VALUES OF THE OLD COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS |
| | MAY HAVE CHANGED SINCE THE ADDITION OF THE ERV AND |
| | NEWLY CALCULATED VENTILATION RATES. PLEASE UPDATE |
| | COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS TO REFLECT THESE NEW VALUES |
| | PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING. |
| | |
| | 9D. OK |
| | |
| | 10. OK |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS RELATED TO NEW INFORMATION ON PLANS: |
| | |
| | 11. A NEW ERV UNIT HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE MECHANICAL |
| | PLANS. NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED REGARDING WIND |
| | MOUNTING AND WIND RESISTANCE FOR THIS OUTDOOR |
| | APPLIANCE. PROVIDE INSTALLATION DETAIL AND |
| | MANUFACTURER'S DATA SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE WIND |
| | RESISTANCE REQUIREMENTS OF FBCM 301.13. |
| | |
| | 12. PAGE A-101 AND LS-1.0 CONTINUE TO HAVE COORDINATION |
| | PROBLEMS. EXAMPLE: STORAGE ROOM 151AND MULTI-PURPOSE |
| | ROOM 146 ARE SHOWN ON LS-1.0 TO BE SEPARATED BY 1-HOUR |
| | CONSTRUCTION. PAGE A-101 WALL TAG AND A-600 WALL TYPES |
| | SHOW THIS WALL AS CARRYING NO FIRE RATING. THE NEW DUCT |
| | FOR THE ERV SYSTEM IS SHOWN PENETRATING THIS WALL WITH |
| | NO PROTECTION. ALSO, THE WALLS AT MECHANICAL ROOM 150 |
| | AND PANTRY 147 ARE ALSO SHOWN WITH FIRE RATED WALLS. |
| | THERE ARE MULTIPLE DUCT PENETRATIONS IN THESE AREAS |
| | WITHOUT PROTECTION. PLEASE COORDINATE ALL AEAS OF |
| | MECHANICAL, ARCHITECTURAL AND LIFE SAFETY PLANS AND |
| | SHOW EACH DUCT PENETRATION TO BE PROTECTED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 607.5. |
| | NOTE: SMOKE DAMPERS ARE ONLY REQUIRED AT THE CORRIDOR |
| | PENETRATIONS. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: |
| | RONALD J. REGUEIRO |
| | 561.805.6719 |
| | [email protected] |
