| Date |
Text |
| 2008-05-30 13:39:15 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 07100001 |
| | ADD: 1505 N AUSTRALIAN AVE. |
| | CONT: :(PLAN REVIEW/ MAJOR WORKING DRAWING) |
| | TEL: (561644-7416 JEFF HALVERSON |
| | |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | MAY 30,2008 |
| | 2NDREVIEW |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1A)INFORMATIONAL,WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE |
| | INDICATE THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS |
| | NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL |
| | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION |
| | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND |
| | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | 1B)PLEASE SUBMIT 2 OF ALL SURVEYS, PLANS, REPORTS, |
| | REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR SUBMITTALS FOR |
| | REVIEW FOR PERMIT. IF YOUR PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A |
| | RESIDENT INSPECTOR OR IF YOUR PROJECT IS A THRESHOLD |
| | BUILDING REQUIRING A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR THEN (3) THREE |
| | SETS OF ALL SAID DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE. 106.1* /2004 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTSWEST PALM |
| | BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. |
| | THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRE 3 SETS OF ALL DOCUMENTS SINCE |
| | IT WILL REQUIRE A RESIDENT INSPECTOR , 109.3.7*. |
| | |
| | 1C)COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 1D) PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT (FIRST TIME REVIEW) |
| | AFTER JULY 1ST, 2007 SHALL BE REVIEWED TO THE 2004 FBC |
| | BUILDING WITH THE2007 REVISIONS. NOTE IF THE PLANS |
| | SUBMITTED AS A MAJOR WORKING DRAWING HAVE NOT BEEN |
| | CONVERTED INTO A PERMIT APPLICATION BEFORE OCT. 1,2008 |
| | THE PLANS WILL NEED TO BE REDESIGNED TO THE 2007 |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. |
| | |
| | 1E) 2ND REQUEST,THE MAJOR WORKING DRAWING REVIEW |
| | UNDER SCOPE OF PROJECT INDICATES A 10,000 SQ FT |
| | MULTIPURPOSE BUILDING, PLEASE ADD THE RENOVATION TO THE |
| | EXISTING BUILDING TO THE APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 2) DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REQUIREMENTS: |
| | |
| | 2A)PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS |
| | PREPARED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND BEING FILED FOR |
| | PUBLIC RECORD SHALL HAVE THE SIGNATURE AND SEAL OF THE |
| | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AFFIXED TO THE DOCUMENT. |
| | FL STATE STAT: 61G15-23.002 ENGINEERS |
| | FL ATATE STAT: 61G16.003 ARCHITECTS |
| | IN BOTH SETS OF PLANS FOR THE NEW GAINES PARK COMMUNITY |
| | CENTER AND THE NORTHWEST WING RENOVATIONS THE |
| | COVERSHEETS ARE NOTSIGNED, SEALED OR DATED. |
| | |
| | |
| | 2B) 481.219 F.S.CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION.THE |
| | TITLE BLOCK FOR ANY SHEET BEARING THE NAME OF AN |
| | ARCHITECT PRACTICING UNDER A FICTITIOUS NAME, A |
| | CORPORATION, OR A PARTNERSHIP, OFFERING ARCHITECTURAL |
| | SERVICES, SHALL INCLUDE THE CERTIFICATE OF |
| | AUTHORIZATION NUMBER.ADD THE NUMBER TO EACH SHEET. |
| | THIS MAY BE ADDED BY HAND. |
| | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT |
| | BA ARCHITECTURAL |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF |
| | BUSSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION OF YOUR |
| | CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION, I CAN NOT FIND IT ON THE |
| | WEBSITE. |
| | |
| | 2C)COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 3) 2ND REQUEST, NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. 106.1.2 |
| | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED.A THOROUGH REVIEW CAN |
| | NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL |
| | INFORMATION REQUESTED ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR |
| | THAT WERE NOT PART OF THIS REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 3A) 10.2* W. P. B. ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, INFORMATION |
| | THAT IS REQUIRED FOR RECORD KEEPING & FOR CERTIFICATE |
| | OF OCCUPANCY: |
| | A) THE EDITION OF THE CODE UNDER WHICH THE PROJECT IS |
| | DESIGNED. |
| | |
| | PLEASE SEE SHEET A-100 PROJECT CRITERIA DOES NOT |
| | INDICATE TO WHAT CODE THIS BUILDING IS DESIGNED TOO. |
| | PLEASE SEE STRUCTURAL SHEET S-3.1 STILL INDICATES THE |
| | 2004 FBC WITH 2006 AMENDMENTS. THE 2007 AMENDMENTS |
| | CLEARLY ARE AFFECTED BY WIND. |
| | |
| | B) COMPLIED. |
| | C) 2ND REQUEST,THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION AS DEFINED IN |
| | CHAPTER 5 & 6, TABLE 503 & 601. 106.3.5(3) MINIMUM TYPE |
| | OF CONSTRUCTION SEE TABLE 503 PLANS INDICATE TYPE I |
| | CONSTRUCTIONTHERE IS NO CONFIRMATION AS TO TYPE 1A 3HR |
| | FIRE RATINGS OR TYPE 1B 2HR FIRE RATINGS,NOTE SEE |
| | TABLE 601 FOR FIRE RATINGS. |
| | |
| | D) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | E)2ND REQUEST, IF AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS |
| | PROVIDED NEITHER SHEET G-100 THE INDEX OF DRAWINGS, |
| | LS-1.0 NOR A-100 PROJECT CRITERIA LIST THE REQUIRED |
| | FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS NOR THE INSTALATION OF A NFPA 13 |
| | SYSTEM. SECTION 903.2.1.3 (2) REQUIRES A SPRINKLER |
| | SYSTEM WHEN IN A A-3 OCCUPANCYWHEN THERE IS A |
| | OCCUPANCY EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 300. THIS IS A |
| | REQUIRED SYSTEM. |
| | F)2ND REQUESTWHETHER THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS |
| | REQUIRED. SEE SECTION 903.2.1.3(2). |
| | G) ANY SPECIAL STIPULATIONS & CONDITIONS OF THE |
| | BUILDING PERMIT |
| | H) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 3B) 2ND REQUEST, THE S-3.1 INDICATES THE WIND DESIGN |
| | FROM ASCE 7-02FOR THE BUILDING, PLEASE REVIEW THE |
| | BUILDINGS CATEGORY AND IMPORTANCE FACTOR. PLEASE REVIEW |
| | SHEET A-101 & A-102 FOR OCCUPANCY. AS INDICATED THESE |
| | SHEETS INDICATE THE CAPABILITY OF 300 PEOPLE WITH THE |
| | ACTUAL OCCUPANT LOAD BEING QUIET HIGHER. PLEASE SEE |
| | ASCE 7-02 TABLE 1-1 BUILDING CATEGORY III,WITH A |
| | IMPORTANCE FACOR OF 1.15 BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES |
| | WHERE MORE THAN 300 PEOPLE CONGREGATE IN ONE AREA. |
| | PLEASE REVISE THE BUILDING CATEGORY AND IMPORTANCE |
| | FACTOR. SEE UPPER LEFT HAND PORTION OF THE SHEET STILL |
| | INDICATES 1.0 IMPORTANCE FACTOR. |
| | |
| | 3C) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 4) 2ND REQUEST, THE LIFE SAFETY SHEET LS-100 INDICATES |
| | FOR THE MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM THE USE OF 15 NET. TABLE |
| | 1004.1.2 ESTABLISHES THE MINIMUM OCCUPANT LOAD FOR |
| | WHICH THE EGRESS FACILITIES MUST BE DESIGNED. THE |
| | FACTORS ARE NOT BASED ON THE NORMAL OCCUPANCY, BUT , ON |
| | THE MAXIMUM OCCUPANT LOAD SCENARIO, A WORST CASE |
| | PROBABILITY. IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THE FACTORS ARE |
| | NOT BASED ON THE OCCUPANCY CLASS OF THE BUILDING, BUT , |
| | ON THE USE OF THE AREA OR SPACE. PLEASE RECALCULATE THE |
| | EGRESS CAPACITIES FOR THE MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM AT THE |
| | WORST CASE SCENARIO @ 5 AND ASSOCIATED EXITS. |
| | |
| | 5A) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 5B)2ND REQUEST, AT THIS TIME BECAUSE OF THE UNKNOWN |
| | BUILDING FACTORS THIS COMMENT MAY OR MAY NOT APPLY IN |
| | FUTURE REVIEWS:FBC* 109.3.7RESIDENT INSPECTOR. |
| | SUBMIT INSPECTOR RESUME' AND LICENSE DOCUMENTS TO |
| | HAROLD PISKURA, DIRECTOR OF THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR |
| | PROGRAM. A |
| | RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM IS REQUIRED, ON THIS |
| | PROJECT, DUE TO ONE OR MORE OF |
| | THE FOLLOWING: |
| | XXX - BUILDINGS/ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II CONSTRUCTION |
| | - ANY MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS XXX - STRUCTURES IN |
| | WHICH THE CONCRETEDESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE |
| | STRENGTH (F'C) IN EXCESS OF 3000 PSI - PILE DRIVING |
| | COLUMNS, WALLS, BEAMS 4,000 PSI S-3.1. |
| | - BUILDINGS OVER 20,000 SQ FT IN AREA |
| | - BUILDINGS OVER 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT |
| | - BUILDING/STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN OR |
| | METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION |
| | |
| | FORMS FOR THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR WILL BE ATTACHED AND |
| | WILL NEED TO BE FILED OUT AND RETURNED TO HAROLD |
| | PISKURA DIRECTOR OF THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM. |
| | |
| | 6)2ND REQUEST,L-3.0 LANDSCAPE PAVING PLAN PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITHIN THEBOUNDARY OF THE |
| | SITE TO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION, ACCESSIBLE PARKING, |
| | PASSENGER LOADING ZONES SIDEWALKS TO AN ACCESSIBLE |
| | ENTRANCE. 11-4.1.2(1)-(5). SHEET A-100 & L-3.0 DO NOT |
| | REFLECT THE SAME ROUTE FROM THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING TO |
| | THE NEW BUILDING. A-100 INDICATES A SIDEWALK THAT |
| | ALLOWS WHEELCHAIRS TO TRAVEL INFRON T OF THE PARKED |
| | VEHICLES WHILE L-3.0 STILL FORCES THE WHEELCHAIR USER |
| | TO TRAVEL BEHIND THE PARKED VEHICLE, PLEASE COORDINATE |
| | PLANS.11-4.6.2. |
| | |
| | 7) 2ND REQUEST, THE RESPONCE SHEET INDICATED TO REFER |
| | TO CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE NOTES, WHERE. SHET L-3.0 PAVING |
| | MATERIALSSCHEDULE DOES NOT INDICATE THE USE OF |
| | DETECTABLE WARNING TEXTURES11-4.29.2. INDICATE |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH: 11-4.29.5 DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT |
| | HAZARDOUS VEHICULAR AREAS. |
| | |
| | 8)COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 9) 2ND REQUEST, RESPONCE SHEET REFERS TO CIVIL SHEET |
| | C-4 , PLEASE INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH : PASSENGER |
| | LOADING ZONES PLEASE PROVIDE ACCESS AISLE FOR PASSENGER |
| | LOADING ZONE SEE FIGURE 10, AND COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | 11-4.29.5/ 11-4.6.6. |
| | |
| | 10) SEMI-COMPLIED. SHEET A-1.00 INDICATES A CUT SECTION |
| | THROUGH THE DISABLED PARKING SPOTS DETAIL# 1 SHEET |
| | A-603, SHEET IS MISSING. THE RESPONCE SHEET INDICATES |
| | TO SEE A-605 DETAIL# 1. THE HANDICAPPED SIGNAGE |
| | INDICATES 2 AREAS TO LOCATE THIS SECTION : |
| | 10A) DETAIL 16 A-603 |
| | 10B) DETAIL 5 A-604 |
| | NEITHER OF THESE SECTION PORVIDE THE HANDICAPPED SIGN |
| | HEIGHTS. |
| | |
| | 11-12) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 13)2ND REQUEST, SHEET A-1 DOES INDICATE WALL TAGS |
| | INDICATING WALLS BUT THE PLANS DO NOT PROVIDE A DETAIL |
| | SHEET IDENTIFYING WALL TYPES, THE INDEX LIST A-600 FOR |
| | WALL DETAILS , THERE ARE NO WALL DETAILS PROVIDING WALL |
| | TYPES AND FIRE RATING, PLEASE SEE TABLE 1016.1. FOR |
| | ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RATING OF CORRIDOR. |
| | ENTRANCE HALLWAY 152 IS THE EXIT ACCESS CORRIDOR FOR |
| | THE MULTI-PURPOSE ASSEMBLY ROOM 146 , SEE TABLE 1016.1 |
| | REQUIRES A 1 HR RATED CORRIDOR FOR EITHER |
| | NON-SPRINKLERED OR SPRINKLERED BUILDINGS. |
| | |
| | 14) SEMI-COMPLIED, PLANS ARE INCOMPLETE AND A THROUGH |
| | REVIEW CAN NOT BE COMPLETED AT THIS TIME. |
| | 106.3.5 WILL PROVIDE THE MINIMUM CRITERIA AND DOCUMENTS |
| | REQUIRED FOR REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 15) SEMI-COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 16-17) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 18)2ND REQUEST, FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & |
| | CLADDING, PROVIDE 3COPIES OF ALL REPORTSFORTHRESHOLD |
| | OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT TESTING REPORTS |
| | ,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: |
| | A) WINDOWS FIXED: STOREFRONT , CURTAIN WALL |
| | B) WINDOWSOPERABLE WINDOWS: SINGLE HUNG, CASEMENT |
| | C) MULLIONS |
| | D) GLASS BLOCK |
| | E) GLAZED SWING DOORS |
| | F) AUTOMATIC SLIDING DOORS |
| | G) HOLLOW METAL DOORS EXTERIOR |
| | H) OVERHEAD DOORS |
| | I) TRUSS ANCHORS |
| | J) ROOF HATCHES |
| | K) ROOF ASSEMBLIES |
| | L) PRE-ENGINEERED A/C STANDS |
| | |
| | 19)2ND REQUEST,106.3PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED |
| | WITH PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE |
| | REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE |
| | APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A COVER |
| | SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE |
| | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, |
| | SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR |
| | SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. |
| | |
| | 20) 2ND REQUEST, WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATEDBY DCA |
| | RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY |
| | THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR |
| | JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 21) 2ND REQUEST,THIS ROOF IS MISSING PRODUCT |
| | COMPLIANCE REPORTS WITH THE FOLLOW ITEMS: |
| | __XX_ CONTRACTOR DID NOT PROVIDE THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT. |
| | __XX_ CONTRACTOR FAILED TO INDICATE WHICH SUB-SYSTEM TO |
| | BE USED. |
| | __XX_ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED HAS A LOW PRESSURE FOR ZONE |
| | _2&3__ . |
| | __XX_ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED STATES LIMITATION# 7, SHOULD |
| | THE FASTENER RESISTANCE BE LESS THAN THAT REQUIRED, AS |
| | DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, A REVISED FASTENER |
| | SPACING, PREPARED , SIGNED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA |
| | REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, REGISTERED |
| | ARCHITECT OR REGISTERED ROOF CONSULTANT MAY BE |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | __XX_ IF THE SUB-SYSTEM TO BE USED INDICATES |
| | LIMITATION# 9, NO ENHANCEDFASTENING ALLOWED. |
| | |
| | 22) THE SHEET S4.1 DETAIL# 1 INDICATES THE TRELLIS |
| | ASSEMBLY AND NOA'S: |
| | USP C88 NOA 07-0306.06 |
| | USP RT7 NOA07-0306.10 |
| | USPKCB88 FL 822.149 |
| | ALL THREE OF THE LISTED ABOVE WILL NEED TO MEET THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF 18-20. |
| | |
| | 23) 2ND REQUEST,A-104 ROOF PLAN FAILS TO IDENTIFY |
| | ROOF DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND OR DETAILS, THE ROOF DRAIN |
| | SIZE IS NOT PROVIDED, WHAT TYPE OF SECONDARY DRAINAGE |
| | AND VERTICAL CONTRIBUTING AREAS, THIS INFORMATION IS |
| | ALSO MISSING FROM THE PLUMBING PLAN. 106.3.5.1.1(8). |
| | OVERFLOWS ARE NOT SIZED, FBC BUILDING 1503.4.3 OVERFLOW |
| | SCUPPERS SHALL BE SIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FBC |
| | PLUMBING CODE. |
| | |
| | 24) 2ND REQUEST,ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE DEFICIENT IN |
| | INFORMATION FOR THE ENERGY CODE AND CALCULATIONS, |
| | 106.3.5(9) &106.3.5.1.4(1) & 13-400.0.ABC COMPLIANCE |
| | CRITERIA. |
| | |
| | 25) COMPLIED.E |
| | |
| | |
| | RENOVATION OF EXISTING NORTH WING : |
| | |
| | |
| | 26A)SEMI-COMPLIED,SHEET A-100 PROJECT CRITERIA |
| | INDICATES THIS BUILDING IS TO BE CLASSIFIED AS A TYPE I |
| | BUILDING, IS THIS A TYPE IA BUILDING WITH 3HR FIRE |
| | PROTECTION OR TYPE IB WITH A 2 HR FIRE PROTECTION OF |
| | STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS, IN EITHERCASE THERE WOULD BE NO |
| | WOOD TRUSSES AND OR ROOF SHEATHING. PLEASE INDICATE |
| | MINIMUMBUILDING TYPE. |
| | |
| | THE OTHER ISSUE IS THIS BUILDING BE FIRE SPRINKLERED ? |
| | IS THE FIRE SPRINKLER REQUIRED? |
| | THESE QUESTIONS NEED TO BE ANSWERED TO KNOW IF THE |
| | CORRIDORS WILL REQUIRE RATED CORRIDORS,SEE TABLE 1016.1 |
| | FOR DAY CARE OCCUPANCIES. |
| | THE PLANS INDICATE SOME OF THE DOORS BEING RATED BUT |
| | THERE ARE MANY NEW DOORS AND EXISTING DOOR FRAMES AND |
| | THE NEW DOORS ARE NOT RATED. WE STILL CAN NOT DO A |
| | COMPLETE REVIEW WITHOUT THE |
| | ABOVE INFORMATION PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 26B) SEMI- COMPLIED. SEE THE ABOVE STATEMENTS. |
| | |
| | 26C) 2ND REQUEST, PLEASE ALSO INDICATE TO WHAT LEVEL |
| | ALTERATION WORK WILL ACCOMPLISHED UNDER THIS PERMIT. |
| | PLEASE SEE 2004 FBC EXISTING BUILDING CODE 301.1.THE |
| | WORK PREFORMED ON AN EXISTING BUILDING SHALL BE |
| | CLASSIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS CHAPTER.RESPONCE |
| | INDICATES NOTES ON G-100 & A-101.PLANS DO NOT INDICATE |
| | LEVEL OF ALTERATION IN EITHER THE APPLICABLE CODE OR |
| | PROJECT CRITERIA. |
| | |
| | 27) SEMI-COMPLIED THE DOOR SCHEDULE DOES NOW INDICATES |
| | ALOT OF NEW DOORS WITH EXISTING DOOR FRAMES BUT NO FIRE |
| | RATING, WITH NOT HAVING INFORMATION IF THERE IS FIRE |
| | SPRINKLERS OR IF THERE WILL BE FIRE SPRINKLERS ADDED, |
| | WE NEED TO KNOW THIS INFORMATION TO DETERMINE THROUGH |
| | TABLE 1016.1 FIRE RATINGS FOR CORRIDORS. |
| | |
| | 28) COMPLIED- NO ROOF WORK UNDER THIS PERMIT FOR THIS |
| | BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 29) NEW COMMENT DOOR # 5 IS A NEW OPENING, WILL NEED TO |
| | COMPLY WITH 11-4.13.6 MANEUVERING CLEARENCES AT DOORS. |
| | MINIMUM MANEUVERING CLEARANCES AT DOORS THAT ARE NOT |
| | AUTOMATIC OR POWER-ASSISTED SHALL BE AS SHOWN IN FIG. |
| | 25. THE FLOOR OR GROUND AREA WITHIN THE REQUIRED |
| | CLEARANCES SHALL BE CLEAR & LEVEL. REQUIRES 18" ON THE |
| | LATCH SIDE. |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | JIM WITMER CBO |
| | PLAN REVIEW II |
| | TEL:(561)805-6715 |
| | FAX: (561)805-6731 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
