| Date |
Text |
| 2008-02-26 17:57:51 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC* |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | |
| | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FSFLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1A. ---VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- |
| | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION |
| | AND REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY.A |
| | TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT |
| | NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, |
| | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE |
| | CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILLH HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR |
| | PERMIT.THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | 1B. COMMENT ADDRESSED; 3 SETS SUBMITTED.FBC*106.1.1 |
| | |
| | 1C. SEE PREVIOUS LISTS REGARDING PLANS TO BE SPECIFIC |
| | TO TECHNICAL CODES.THE CODE SHALL NOT BE CITED AS A |
| | WHOLE OR IN PART.SEE SHEET A5-D.1; AN INCOMPLETE CODE |
| | REFERENCE NUMBER WAS USED.PLEASE SEE OTHER COMMENTS |
| | AND REVISE AS NECESSARY TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 4-5, 23B, 26. PROVISO ITEMS. |
| | |
| | 27.3RD REQUEST, PLEASE PROVIDE EITHER A LETTER FROM |
| | THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER THAT THE FASTENERS FOR THE |
| | OLDER NOAS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND CONFIRMED THAT 1/3 |
| | STRESS INCREASE WAS NOT TAKEN.THE RESPONSE STATES |
| | THAT ?ALL NOAS SUBMITTED ARE BASED ON THE 2004 FBC NOT |
| | 2001.HOWEVER, SEE FL1589 WHICH WAS SUBMITTED FOR |
| | INGERSOLL RAND DOOR.THIS PRODUCT APPROVAL IS BASED ON |
| | FBC2001, NOT FBC2004.FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL IS REQUIRED FAC9B72.A LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | CANNOT BE ISSUED BECAUSE COMPLIANCE WITH FBC2004 HAS |
| | NOT BEEN SHOWN.PLEASE PROVIDE THE LETTER AS |
| | PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED.OTHER NOAS SUBMITTED WERE ISSUED |
| | PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION OF FBC2004; PLEASE CONFIRM THAT |
| | THE STRESS INCREASE WAS NOT TAKEN AND, IF IT WAS, THAT |
| | ANCHORING IS NOT AFFECTED. |
| | |
| | 29A.S07-001 IS NOTED IN THE PREVIOUS CORRECTION LIST, |
| | THE RESPONSE LETTER, AND SHEET A8.1, BUT I WAS UNABLE |
| | TO LOCATE THIS PAPERWORK IN THE SUBMITTAL.PLEASE |
| | ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 30.THE PREVIOUS REVIEW REQUESTED PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | INFORMATION AND CLARIFICATION.PLEASE NOTE THAT, IF A |
| | SCHEDULE OF OPENINGS WITH DESIGN PRESSURE FOR EACH |
| | OPENING IS NOT SUBMITTED, THE PRODUCTS ARE TO COMPLY |
| | WITH THE MOST STRINGENT PRESSURE ON THE CHART S0-3.0 |
| | WHICH IS +66/-71PSF FOR ZONE 4, +66/-88PSF FOR ZONE 5. |
| | NOTE THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | A.NOA 03 0611.04, +-60PSF LIMITATION, BUT THE DOORS |
| | ARE LOCATED IN ZONE 5 WITH A +66/-88PSF DP REQUIREMENT |
| | SHEET S0 3.0. |
| | |
| | B.NOA 02 0712.03, SEE ITEM 27.THIS PRODUCT HAS A DP |
| | OF +-70; APPEARS TO BE OK BASED ON INTERPOLATION. |
| | |
| | C.THE STAIRWELL DOORS ARE TO BE FIRE RATED AND ALSO |
| | MEET DESIGN PRESSURE REQUIREMENTS OF ZONE 5 +66/-88. AS |
| | THE PAPERWORK S07 001R1 IS NOT IN THE PACKAGE, CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE CANNOT BE DETERMINED. |
| | |
| | D.NOA 03 0327.02 OK FOR ZONE 4, 05 0624.03 OK, 05 |
| | 0624.04 OK, 05 0624.06 OK, 07 0416.02 OK, 05 1005.02 |
| | OK |
| | |
| | E.PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC |
| | RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS FS471. |
| | PROVIDE ORIGINALS FOR THE OPEN LATTICE WINDLOADS. |
| | ENGINEER FOR THE OPEN LATTICE IS TO USE ASCE7-02, |
| | FBC35.ASCE7-02 HAS NOT BEEN ADOPTED BY FBC. |
| | |
| | 31.PREVIOUS LIST HAD REQUESTED CLARIFICATION AND/OR |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE WALL LOUVERS.SHEET A8.2 |
| | SPECIFIES A NOA WHICH WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE NOA |
| | SUBMITTAL BOOK.PLEASE PROVIDE. |
| | |
| | 33B.COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS LIST; CODE SUMMARY; PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE WHAT TYPE OF OCCUPANCY. SEE FBC302.1, |
| | STRUCTURES OR PORTIONS OF STRUCTURES TO BE CLASSIFIED. |
| | SHEET LS0.0, BUSINESS, MERCANTILE, AND S2 DECLARED, BUT |
| | ON LS0 FACTORY INDUSTRIAL AND SPECIAL PURPOSE |
| | INDUSTRIAL AREAS DECLARED.PLEASE RESOLVE |
| | INCONSISTENCIES. |
| | |
| | 33C. COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS LIST, SHEET LS.1, LS.2 S2 IS |
| | SHOWN AS INCIDENTAL BUT THIS IS NOT INCIDENTAL USE. THE |
| | ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE LETTER INDICATES THAT ALL |
| | REFERENCES TO INCIDENTAL HAVE BEEN REMOVED, SO |
| | APPARENTLY ARCHITECT IS IN AGREEMENT.PLEASE REMOVE |
| | REMAINING INCIDENTAL REFERENCES. PLEASE CHECK ALL |
| | SHEETS AS OTHER SHEETS MAY BE AFFECTED. |
| | |
| | 34A. WALL TYPE IDENTIFIERS ADDED.SHEET A6.1, FIRST |
| | FLOOR ENLARGED PLAN SOUTH, WALL TYPE IDENTIFIER BETWEEN |
| | RETAIL 1.102 AND FPL VAULT 1.103 SHOWS A 3 HOUR WALL |
| | FOR W2.1-8 AND A 2 HOUR REQUIREMENT BETWEEN RETAIL |
| | 1.102 AND PARKING GARAGE.THE DETAIL FOR W2.1 DOES NOT |
| | SHOW A FIRE RESISTIVE RATING AND STATES REF FBC 721.2 |
| | WHEN RATED, SHEET A5-D.1.SEE COMMENT 1C, DETAILS AND |
| | PLANS MUST BE SPECIFIC, CANNOT REFER TO CODE SECTIONS |
| | TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE.ALSO THIS IS NOT THE CORRECT |
| | CODE REFERENCE.AS THERE ARE TABLES AND UL ASSEMBLY |
| | DETAILS IN SHEETS LS1-D.1 THROUGH 3, YOU MAY REFER TO |
| | THE SPECIFIC ASSEMBLY OR PLAN PAGE RATHER THAN AN |
| | INCORRECT/INCOMPLETE CODE REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | 34B. THE COMMENT REGARDING OPENING PROTECTIVES WAS |
| | ADDRESSED BY SHOWING WINDOW W6 AT THE WAITING ROOM AS |
| | 90 MINUTE ON SHEET A8.2.THE IMPACT WINDOW IS NOT |
| | AVAILABLE AS A FIRE RATED WINDOW.IF YOU FEEL THIS |
| | COMMENT IS IN ERROR, PLEASE PROVIDE SPEC SHEETS FROM |
| | THE MANUFACTURER SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH FIRE RESISTIVE |
| | RATING REQUIREMENT. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 37.SEE LS0.0, CODE SUMMARY, FIRE RESISTANT RATINGS OR |
| | SEPARATIONS.IT STATES THAT EVERY EXTERIOR WALL WITH |
| | 15FT OF A PROPERTY LINE . . . AS REQUIRED BY TABLE 602. |
| | NOTE THAT OPENING PROTECTION IS REQUIRED BY FBC TABLE |
| | 704.8, SEE ALSO COMMENT 1C.SEE FBC TABLE 704.8, 25% |
| | UNPROTECTED OPENINGS ALLOWED AS MODIFIED BY FBC704.8.1. |
| | IT IS ACCEPTABLE TO EXCEED CODE COMPLIANCE, BUT PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY DESIGN INTENT AS FIRE RESISTIVE RATINGS ARE NOT |
| | SHOWN FOR THE EAST ELEVATION. |
