| Date |
Text |
| 2007-12-26 14:04:50 | |
| | *** DENIED2ND REVIEW*** |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SEVERAL COMMENTS FROM THE |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW WHICH ARE STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE AS STATED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW THERE WERE |
| | ITEMS NOT YET SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW WHICH COULD CREATE |
| | NEW COMMENTS. THIS WILL ALSO REMAIN AS THERE ARE NEW |
| | ITEMS ONLY NOW BEING SUBMITTED FOR THE FIRST REVIEW |
| | ALONG WITH ITEMS WHICH HAVE STILL NOT BEEN SUBMITTED. |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS CAN ONLY BE MADE ON PLANS AND |
| | DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE:THIS NOTE REMAINS AS THERE ARE STILL CODES |
| | REFLECTED ON PLANS WHICH ARE NOT CURRENT OR LATEST |
| | ADOPTED EDITIONS AS PREVIOUSLY NOTES: FOR EXAMPLE: |
| | PLEASE SEE LS0.0 WHICH SHOWS THE 2002 NEC/ NFPA-70. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE** |
| | PLEASE KNOW THAT ANY PERMIT APPLICATIONS WHICH ARE |
| | SUBMITTED AFTER DECEMBER 8TH, 2006 PLACES PROJECTS |
| | UNDER THE NEW CODES ADOPTED BY THE STATE. PLEASE SEE |
| | THAT THIS SHALL INCLUDE 2006 REVISIONS TO THE 2004 FBC |
| | FOR ALL TRADES AND THE 2005 NFPA-70. PLEASE KNOW THERE |
| | ARE CHANGES IN THE FBC WHICH MAY AFFECT DESIGNS FOR ALL |
| | TRADES. |
| | PLEASE LIST THE FOLLOWING ON ELECTRICAL SHEETS FOR THIS |
| | REVIEWER AT A MINIMUM. |
| | 2004 FBC W/ 2006 REVISIONS |
| | 2005 NFPA-70 |
| | 2002 NFPA-72 |
| | 2003 NFPA-101 |
| | 2002 NFPA-110 |
| | 2003 NFPA-20 |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE THE T-1 SHEET WHICH CONTAINS |
| | CODE WHICH IS NOT ACCURATE OR NO LONGER ADOPTED BY THE |
| | STATE. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE 2002 NEC NOTED, PLEASE SEE A 2004 |
| | NFPA-101 WAS NOTED AND 2003 REVISIONS TO THE FBC. |
| | PLEASE SEE SOME OF THE CODE ON LS SHEET HAS BEEN |
| | UPDATED HOWEVER LS SHEET STILL INDICATES SOME CODE NO |
| | LONGER IN ADOPTION. |
| | ** MANY OF THESE ARE OK ON ELECTRICAL PLANS. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PERMIT APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED |
| | AS PREVIOUSLY NOTED WERE NOT CORRECTED. PLEASE SEE THE |
| | DUPLICATE APPLICATION WHICH HAS CONTRACTORS SIGNED |
| | STILL NEEDS TO BE NOTARIZED. |
| | THIS WAS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE #34. |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FPL VAULT IS STILL SHOWING POWER |
| | BEING FED INTO THIS ROOM WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED PER FPL |
| | VAULT STANDARDS AND VAULT SPECIFICATIONS. PLEASE SEE |
| | E2.1, REDLINED SET FOR THIS ENLARGED ROOM LAYOUT. |
| | ** PREVIOUS NOTE #6 ** |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE:PLEASE SEE SHEET E2.1, WHAT IS THE MSBE-3 |
| | DESIGNATION ON THE PLANS AT THE FIRE PUMP ROOM? |
| | IT IS UNCLEAR WHAT THIS IS AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED PHOTO-METRICS FOR |
| | EGRESS PATHS WHICH MEET THE MINIMUM LIGHTING LEVELS AS |
| | REQUIRED PER NFPA-101 7.8 AND 7.9. |
| | PLEASE SEE 7.8.1.3, 7.9.2.2 |
| | THE RESPONSE LETTER MENTIONS THIS WILL BE DONE AT A |
| | LATER DATE; HOWEVER THIS IS REQUIRED AT THIS TIME TO |
| | MEET THE MINIMUM FOR LIFE SAFETY. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE LIGHT FIXTURES SHOWN ON PLANS DO NOT |
| | CORRELATE WITH THE FIXTURE LEGEND.FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE |
| | SEE B-EM WHICH IS NOT LISTED. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE HID FIXTURES FOR BACK |
| | UP AND TIME RESPONSE AS THESE ARE LIFE SAFETY FIXTURES. |
| | HOW WILL THE FIXTURE PROVIDE REQUIRED LIGHTING IN THE |
| | TIME GIVEN IF THESE ARE HID? |
| | PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING IN STAIRS STILL SHOW A STANDARD |
| | FIXTURE WITH NO BATTERY BACK UP OF ANY KIND. BATTERY |
| | BACK UP FOR THE 1FT CANDLE MINIMUM WILL BE REQUIRED. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE ROOMS ARE PREVIOUSLY SPECIFIED WILL |
| | REQUIRE BATTERY BACK UP FIXTURES OF SOME KIND. THE REST |
| | OF THE RESPONSE STATES A COMMENT ABOUT THE STAIRS. |
| | THE SECTION WITH RESPECT TO THE SPIRAL STAIR HAS BEEN |
| | REMOVED AND REQUIRED EGRESS WAS CONFIRMED WITH THE |
| | BUILDING REVIEWER. |
| | LS 101 7.8, 7.9 AND SECTIONS GIVEN IN PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | NOTES BELOW. |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTES** |
| | MOST OF THESE WERE SUBMITTED HOWEVER PLEASE SEE THE |
| | MINIMUM AVERAGE ON SHEETS FOR NORMAL DO NOT MEET THE |
| | MINIMUM LEVELS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO |
| | CONTAIN SOME SORT OF BATTERY BACK UP LIGHTING FIXTURE. |
| | THE STAIR TOWERS WILL REQUIRE A BATTERY BACK UP FIXTURE |
| | OF SOME TYPE TO MEET THE MINIMUM OF 1FT CANDLE LEVEL |
| | UNDER EMERGENCY.7.8.2.1, 7.9.2.2 |
| | PLEASE SEE THE OTHER LOCATIONS WILL BE THE GENERATOR |
| | ROOM, FIRE PUMP ROOM, MAIN ELECTRICAL ROOM, EMERGENCY |
| | MAIN ELECTRICAL ROOM, AND THE ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT ROOMS. |
| | (SOME OF THESE MAY ALREADY SHOW A BATTERY BACK UP |
| | FIXTURE, BUT MOST DO NOT). |
| | 700.12F. |
| | PLEASE SEE 700.16 FOR THESE SAME ROOMS. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE #8 WITH RESPECT TO |
| | THE WIND LOADS ON ROOF TOP POLES WITH THE EFFECTIVE |
| | PROJECTED AREA. THE LIGHT POLE DETAIL ON SHEET 7.1 DOES |
| | NOT CORRELATE WITH THE AMOUNT OF LIGHTING FIXTURES |
| | SHOWN ON POLES ON E1.2. |
| | RESPONSE MENTIONS CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED, HOWEVER THE |
| | LOCATION IN BINDER WHICH IS LABELED FOR POLE |
| | CALCULATIONS IS EMPTY?? |
| | PLEASE KNOW THE ROOF TOP LIGHTING POLES WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED TO HAVE STRUCTURAL WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS AND |
| | WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING REVIEWER. |
| | ** THIS IS NOTED FOR INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE:PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE #10. THE CODE |
| | SECTIONS GIVEN WERE FOR REQUIRED DEDICATED CIRCUITS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE RESPONSE MENTIONS THIS WAS DONE. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING FOR A COUPLE OF EXAMPLES: |
| | PLEASE SEE E1.1, AS CIRCUIT 1EGL-1 STILL FEEDS ELEVATOR |
| | PITS ON NORTH SIDE AS WELL AS SOUTH SIDE ELEVATOR |
| | PITS. |
| | PLEASE SEE CIRCUIT 1EGH-19 AS THIS CIRCUIT IS SHOWN ON |
| | E2.2 AS FEEDING BOTH ROOMS ON NORTH AND SOUTH SIDE |
| | ELEVATOR ROOMS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING COMMENT AND THE NOTE FROM |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE #13. SAME |
| | COMMENT. |
| | RESPONSE MENTIONS TO SEE E1.1 AND DETAIL 01 AND ALSO |
| | SAYS TO SEE E0.1? |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE 620.23 AS THE EXPLANATORY NOTE IN THE |
| | HANDBOOK FOR ELEVATOR PIT LIGHTING REQUIRES A 5FT |
| | CANDLE LIGHTING LEVEL. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING WHICH WAS EXTRACTED FOR THIS |
| | SECTION ON THE NEC. |
| | *ASME A17.1-2004, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND |
| | ESCALATORS, REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 5 FT-CANDLES (54 LUX) |
| | AT THE PIT FLOOR AND REQUIRES LUMINAIRES TO BE |
| | EXTERNALLY GUARDED TO PREVENT ACCIDENTAL BREAKAGE.* |
| | |
| | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE LIGHTING SYSTEM IN OFFICES AS SOME |
| | AREAS DO NOT SHOW CONTROL/COMPLETED SYSTEM. PLEASE SEE |
| | SHEET E6.1 FOR EXAMPLE AS THE LCP IS BASICALLY BLANK. |
| | WHAT IS THIS? |
| | PLEASE SEE ALL AREAS PER CODE NOT DONE. |
| | PLEASE SEE NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW EVEN GAVE |
| | EXAMPLES AND SPECIFIC ROOMS SUCH AS RETAIL SPACES, YET |
| | NO CHANGES WERE MADE. |
| | PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND 1.3. |
| | |
| | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING ENERGY CALCULATIONS/ |
| | LIGHTING PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS PER 13-415.2 AND |
| | 13-415.2.ABC.1.3 ETC. RESPONSE MENTIONS TO SEE ATTACHED |
| | CALCULATIONS HOWEVER THIS REVIEWER HAS GONE THROUGH ALL |
| | BOOKS AS SUBMITTED. PLANS DO NOT SHOW MINIMUM |
| | COMPLIANCE FOR MAXIMUM LIGHTING LEVELS FOR INTERIOR OR |
| | EXTERIOR LIGHTING. |
| | PLEASE SEE SOME AREAS OF THIS BUILDING WILL HAVE |
| | CONDITIONED SPACE. |
| | |
| | 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE #17. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED INFORMATION FOR FIRE PUMP AND |
| | LOCKED ROTOR OVER CURRENT PROTECTION AND AMPERAGES. THE |
| | NOTE HERE FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW IS BASICALLY THE SAME. |
| | THE RESPONSE MENTIONS THESE ITEMS WERE REVISED AND |
| | ADJUSTED HOWEVER PLEASE SEE RISER SHEET E5.1. ?? |
| | PLEASE SEE FP SHEET FP0.1 AS THIS SHEET STILL SHOWS THE |
| | SAME INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW WHICH DOES NOT |
| | CORRELATE WITH ELECTRICAL SHEETS NOR DOES IT COORDINATE |
| | WITH THE FIRE PUMP SUBMITTALS. |
| | PLEASE ADJUST PLANS AND IF THERE IS ANY QUESTION ON |
| | WHAT IS MEANT FROM THE TYPED COMMENT, PLEASE CALL TO GO |
| | OVER. |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE NEC 695.4B1, 9.3.2.2.3.2(A), (B) ETC PLEASE |
| | SEE THE ELECTRICAL PLANS INDICATE A DISCONNECT WITH |
| | OVER CURRENT PROTECTION AHEAD OF THE FIRE PUMP |
| | CONTROLLER WHICH WILL ALSO CONTAIN OVER CURRENT |
| | PROTECTION. |
| | PLEASE KNOW THERE MAY NOT BE OVER CURRENT PROTECTION ON |
| | THE LINE SIDE OF THE FIRE PUMP CONTROLLER. THE TYPICAL |
| | LISTED FIRE PUMP CONTROLLER CONTAINS THE LOCKED ROTOR |
| | CURRENT SETTING FOR THE SELECTED PUMP AND ASSEMBLY. |
| | 10.4.4.1 NFPA-20 |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE FIRE PUMP IS BEING SHOWN AS 60 HP |
| | ON FP SHEETS AND 75HP ON ELECTRICAL SHEETS. |
| | PLEASE SEE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON WHAT TYPE OF BREAKERS |
| | ARE ON THE SECONDARY EMERGENCY SIDE FOR FIRE PUMP |
| | POWER. AS THE FIRE PUMP IS BEING FED THROUGH A TOTAL OF |
| | THREE BREAKERS ON THE EMERGENCY SIDE, THESE MAY CREATE |
| | AN ISSUE WITH SELECTIVE COORDINATION. |
| | PLEASE SEE THESE BREAKERS ARE TYPICALLY MAGNETIC TYPE. |
| | PLEASE SEE NEC 695 AND NFPA-20CHAPTER 9 AND 10. |
| | |
| | 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE #22. THE |
| | RESPONSE STATES *THIS HAS BEEN VERIFIED WITH FPL AND |
| | CAN BE GRANTED*. |
| | PLEASE KNOW THAT FPL HAS NO AUTHORITY OVER SERVICES |
| | GRANTED BY THE NEC AND ARTICLE 230.2. THE NOTE WAS HOW |
| | DOES THIS SEPARATE SERVICE SHOWN MEET THE NEC AND 230.2 |
| | NOT WHAT FPL WILL OR WILL NOT DO. |
| | PLEASE KNOW THIS SEPARATE SERVICE AS SHOWN IS NOT |
| | GRANTED. |
| | |
| | 13) NOTE: NO ACTION NEEDED, ONLY A RESPONSE FOR LETTER |
| | RESPONSE FROM DESIGNER. |
| | PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE #27, THE REQUEST WAS TO |
| | COMPLETE EDP1 SCHEDULE FOR FEEDERS ETC FOR THE |
| | ELEVATORS AND BASE DISCONNECTS.THE NOTE/REQUEST WAS |
| | NOT FOR THE FINAL OVER CURRENT PROTECTION FROM THE |
| | DISCONNECT(S) TO THE ELEVATOR MOTORS. |
| | THE EDP1 SCHEDULE WAS BLANK ON PREVIOUS PLANS. THANK |
| | YOU FOR COMPLETING INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 14) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE #24 AS THE FIXTURES |
| | ON ROOF-TOP LIGHT POLES AND FIXTURE LEGEND DOES NOT |
| | CORRELATE. |
| | PLEASE SEE E1.2 FOR EXAMPLE AS THERE ARE FIXTURES ON |
| | PLANS WHICH ARE NOT ON THE FIXTURE LEGEND. |
| | PLEASE GO THROUGH CIRCUITING, FIXTURES, FIXTURE |
| | SCHEDULE, LIGHT POLE DETAILS ETC AND COORDINATE ALL. |
| | PLEASE SEE NOTE ABOVE WITH RESPECT TO OTHER PARKING |
| | GARAGE FIXTURES WHICH DO NOT COORDINATE WITH OTHER |
| | LOCATIONS. |
| | ** PLEASE COMPLETE. |
| | LS 101 7.8, 7.9, FBC 13-415.2.ABC.1.3, NEC 408.4, |
| | 310.16, 240.4 ETC |
| | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2 |
| | |
| | 15) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE GENERATOR SPECS SUBMITTED |
| | INDICATE A LOAD BANK WHICH WILL NOT BE PART OF THE |
| | GENERATOR UNIT AND WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE MOUNTED |
| | SEPARATELY. PLEASE SEE THE PLANS AS THE ELECTRICAL |
| | RISER DIAGRAM AND PLANS DO NOT SHOW ANY BREAKER, ANY |
| | LOCATION, ANY CONDUCTORS ETC. |
| | ** PLEASE SEE SUBMITTAL IN SPEC BOOKS FOR A UNIT WHICH |
| | NOTES BEING PART OF THE GENERATOR? |
| | PLEASE COMPLETE RISER AND ADJUST AS NEEDED. |
| | 240.4, 310.16, 215.5, 110.3, 90.7 ETC |
| | FBC 106.1.2 FOR COORDINATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | 16) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE #29. |
| | RESPONSE MENTIONS THIS WAS DONE, HOWEVER COULD NOT |
| | LOCATE ON RISER. |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SEE 230.2E, 700.8 ETC AS ALL MAINS ARE REQUIRED |
| | TO BE LABELED. |
| | PLEASE SEE 230.2 AS THE POWER FOR THE EMERGENCY SERVICE |
| | EQUIPMENT IS BEING TAPPED FROM THE NORMAL ELECTRICAL |
| | SERVICE. IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES PLEASE BE SURE TO |
| | LABEL ALL MAINS ACCORDINGLY. |
| | PLEASE SEE COMMENT ABOVE WITH RESPECT TO RETAIL SERVICE |
| | PROPOSED. |
| | |
| | 17) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE #31 WITH RESPECT TO |
| | COMPLETION OF RETAIL SERVICE CONDUCTORS ETC. AS THE |
| | RISER WILL BE CHANGING AND THE INFORMATION WAS NOT |
| | SHOWN ON REVISED RISER FOR TAPPED CONDUCTORS ETC, THEN |
| | PLEASE SEE 310.16, 240.4 , 250.6, ETC |
| | |
| | 18) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FLORIDA STATUTES WITH RESPECT TO |
| | REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. THIS IS ONLY A |
| | NOTICE GIVEN AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | * ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR |
| | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS |
| | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT |
| | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY |
| | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, |
| | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO |
| | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS |
| | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY |
| | DELAYS. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| 2007-12-25 14:30:47 | 2007-12-25 14:30:47 |
| | |
| | REVIEW IN PROGRESS |
| 2007-12-25 13:01:05 | 2007-12-25 13:01:05 |
| | |
| | ONE SET IN ELECTRICAL FOR REVIEW. |
