| Date |
Text |
| 2008-01-16 07:35:28 | 500 BANYAN BLVD |
| | CITY PARKING GARAGE |
| | JAN.08, 2008 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 07090764 |
| | ADD: 500 BANYAN BLVD |
| | CONT: CATALFUMO |
| | TEL: (561)307-4746 |
| | |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | 2NDREVIEW |
| | ACTION: DENIEDWPB AMENDMENT 105.13.6. W.P.B. |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR THRESHOLD |
| | BUILDINGS A SPECIAL INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY FL S S |
| | 553.79(5) FLORIDA STATUTES TO THE MINIMUM INSPECTIONS |
| | REQUIRED BY THIS CODE. CONTACT HAROLD PISKURA MANAGER |
| | OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR PROGRAM AT (561)805-6711 FOR |
| | FURTHER INFORMATION BEFORE THE PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED. |
| | |
| | 1A)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- |
| | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & |
| | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL |
| | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH |
| | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE |
| | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE |
| | FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR |
| | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | 1B)PLEASE SUBMIT 2 OF ALL SURVEYS, PLANS, REPORTS, |
| | REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR SUBMITTALS FOR |
| | REVIEW FOR PERMIT. IF YOUR PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A |
| | RESIDENT INSPECTOR OR IF YOUR PROJECT IS A THRESHOLD |
| | BUILDING REQUIRING A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR THEN (3) THREE |
| | SETS OF ALL SAID DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE. 106.1* /2004 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTSWEST PALM |
| | BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. |
| | |
| | 1C) 106.1.1* W.P.B. ADMINISTRATIVE CODE/2004 |
| | DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN |
| | THE FORM OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO THE QUALITY OF |
| | MATERIALS, WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY |
| | WITH THE TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE |
| | SPECIFIC TO THE TECHNICAL CODES "SHALL NOT BE CITED AS |
| | A WHOLE OR IN PART, NOR THE TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS |
| | EQUIVALENT BE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC |
| | INFORMATION". CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| | SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND |
| | EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT |
| | WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND |
| | RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS |
| | DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| | |
| | 1D) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 1E) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 2-3) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 4-5) BUILDING PROVISOS. |
| | |
| | 2-22) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 23) 2ND REQUEST,SHEET A2.1 DETAIL# 02 PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | WHAT TYPE OF MATERIAL THE ARCHITECTURAL TRIM WILL BE |
| | MADE FROM? 1406.2.2 PLANS INDICATE A PRECAST MOLDING |
| | WHAT TYPE? |
| | |
| | 23B) THE PLANS INDICATE THAT THE FASTENING SCHEDULE |
| | WILL BE SUPPLIED BY A SPECIALTY ENGINEER, WITH SHOP |
| | DRAWINGS THIS CAN BE A PROVISO ONCE REVIEWED BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD. |
| | |
| | 24) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 25) 2ND REQUEST, SHEET A3.2 PROVIDE THE WIND LOAD |
| | INFORMATION (CALCULATIONS) FOR THE ROOF TOP LIGHT |
| | POLES. ASCE 7-02. RESPONSE INDICATES LOCATION TO BE IN |
| | THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOLDER, THERE IS A HIGHLIGHTED TAB |
| | BUT NO DOCUMENTATION. |
| | |
| | 26) PROVISO: SHOP DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | 27) 2ND REQUEST,PLEASE PROVIDE EITHER A LETTER FROM |
| | THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER THAT THE FASTENERS FOR THE |
| | OLDER NOA?S HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND NO 1 1/3RD INCREASE |
| | WAS TAKEN FOR THE STEEL FASTENERS. |
| | |
| | WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT |
| | WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED |
| | AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR |
| | TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL.ALL OF |
| | THE PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE STAMPED WITH |
| | THORTON-TOMASETTIS' SHOP DRAWING STAMP THAT THEY WERE |
| | REVIEWED. THE ISSUE THAT IS NOT COMMONLY KNOWN THAT THE |
| | OLDER MIAMI-DADE |
| | NOA'S THAT WERE TESTED BEFORE THE 2004 FBC MAY OR MAY |
| | NOT MEET THE CURRENT 2004 FBC. 1605.3.1.1 LOAD |
| | REDUCTIONS. BEFORE THE 2004 FBC THE MANUFACTURERS WERE |
| | ALLOWED TO TAKE |
| | 1.33 STEEL INCREASES AND DID SO WITH THERE FASTENERS. |
| | THE NEWER MIAMI-DADE REPORTS AND THE OLDER REPORTS THAT |
| | ARE BEING UPDATED ARE BEING REVIEWED FOR THE ANCHOR |
| | CONNECTIONS. THE |
| | STATEMENTIS SHOWN UNDER C CALCULATION, REVISED |
| | ANCHOR CALCULATIONS THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED UNDER THE |
| | 2004 FBC WILL STATE THE ANCHOR CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN |
| | REVIEWED TO THE 2004 FBC. |
| | PLEASE REVIEW THE INGERSOLL- RAND AND THE TRAINER GLASS |
| | FOR THE ANCHOR CONNECTIONS MEETING 1605.3.1.1/ 2004 |
| | FBC. THIS MAY AFFECT THE PRESSURES LISTED IN THE |
| | REPORT. |
| | |
| | 28) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 29A)THE EVALUATION REPORT FROM INGERSOLL-RAND REPORT# |
| | S07-001 IS A COPY AND NEEDS TO BE AN ORIGINAL (3) FOR |
| | THRESHOLD BUILDING) SIGNED AND SEALED REPORTS. |
| | 29B) THIS REPORT INDICATES UNDER PRODUCT COMPARISON TO |
| | BE A IN SWING DOOR WHERE AS UNDER EVALUATION FOR A |
| | POSITIVE WIND APPLICATION THE WIND LOAD APPLIED TO THE |
| | DOOR PANEL WOULD BE DISTRIBUTED AROUND THE FRAME |
| | EQUALLY, THIS WOULD REQUIRE THE DOOR & FRAME TO BE |
| | INSTALLED IN A OUT SWING INSTALLATION. PLEASE CORRECT |
| | STATEMENTS. |
| | 29C) PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS INDICATING THE |
| | EXTRAPOLATION OF PRESSURES OR INTERPOLATION OF |
| | PRESSURES, DEPENDING ON REPORT. |
| | 29D) IT APPEARS THAT A LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED, PLEASE FILL OUT FORM FOR A LOCAL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FOR WEST PALM BEACH, SEE FORM ATTACHED. |
| | |
| | 30) EXTERIOR DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED DOES NOT |
| | TIE TO THE DOOR SCHEDULE FOUND ON |
| | SHEET A8.1, PLEASE PROVIDE THE FL NUMBER AS IN THE |
| | WINDOW SCHEDULE FOUND ON A8.2, |
| | OTHERWISE THE LOCATIONS CAN NOT BE LOCATED. 106.1.2 |
| | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 31) 2ND REQUEST, SHEET A-8.02 WINDOW 12& 13 BOTH |
| | INDICATE WALL LOUVERS WITH A SPECIFIC NOA 05-0208.01 |
| | NCA MANUFACTURING, THIS IS A DISCREPANCY FROM THE NOA |
| | SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD, WHICH |
| | CAN BE USED ? |
| | |
| | 32) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 33) PLEASE CORRECT,LS0.0 CODE SUMMARY: |
| | 33A)CODE SUMMARY INDICATES A ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE |
| | WHERE-AS LS 1 & LS 2 ON EACH LEVEL INDICATE THAT THE |
| | DESIGN IS AN OPEN PARKING STRUCTURE, PLEASE CORRECT. IF |
| | OPEN PARKING GARAGE IS TO BE CONSIDERED PROVIDE |
| | CALCULATION FOR OPENNESS 406.3.3.1. |
| | |
| | 33B) CODE SUMMARY PLEASE PROVIDE WHAT TYPE OF OCCUPANCY |
| | THIS BUILDING WILL BE USED FOR, PLEASE SEE 406.2.7 FOR |
| | MIXED SEPARATION. |
| | |
| | 33C) LS.1 PLEASE CORRECT THE DESIGNATION OF THE PARKING |
| | AREA FROM BEING AN INCIDENTAL USE |
| | TO S-2. TABLE 302.1.1 INDICATE ALLOWABLE AREAS FOR |
| | INCIDENTAL USE AREAS. |
| | |
| | 34A) 406.2.7 PARKING GARAGES- MIXED USE, PARKING |
| | GARAGES SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM OTHER OCCUPANCIES IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 302.3.2. |
| | 302.3.2 SEPARATED USES. |
| | EACH PORTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE INDIVIDUALLY |
| | CLASSIFIED AS TO USE AND SHALL BE COMPLETELY SEPARATED |
| | FROM ADJACENT AREAS BY FIRE BARRIER WALLS OR HORIZONTAL |
| | ASSEMBLIES OR BOTH HAVING A FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING |
| | DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE 302.3.2 FOR USES |
| | BEING SEPARATED. PLEASE SEE TABLE 302.3.2 THAT REQUIRES |
| | A 2HR SEPARATION BETWEEN OCCUPANCIES. PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | WALL TAGS INDICATING TYPE OFFIRE RATED WALL. |
| | |
| | 34B) THIS SEPARATION WILL ALSO REQUIRE 1 ? HR OPENING |
| | PROTECTIVE ON DOOR NUMBER2-103A & 2-201B AS WELL AS THE |
| | WAITING ROOM WINDOW AND FIRST FLOOR DOOR NUMBER 1-010A. |
| | PLEASE SEE TABLE 715.3 & TABLE 715.4. |
| | |
| | 35) BUSINESS OCCUPANCY ON THE SECOND FLOOR LEVEL, THE |
| | CONFERENCE ROOM HAS A SECOND MEANS OF EGRESS WHICH |
| | LEAVES THIS OCCUPANCY AND DOES NOT INDICATE WHERE A |
| | DISCERNABLE PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL TO AN EXIT EXIST. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A DISCERNABLE EGRESS PATH OF TRAVEL TO A |
| | VERTICAL EXIT ENCLOSURE. ALSO CONCERNS THAT CARS CAN |
| | SWING INTO THIS PATH OF TRAVEL PLEASE PROVIDE A BOLLARD |
| | SYSTEM OF PROTECTION AND DESIGNATION OF EGRESS PATH. |
| | PLEASE SEE 1013.2. |
| | |
| | 36) SHEETA8.2 INDICATES A WINDOW DESIGNATION W-8 AS |
| | WELL AS ON THE ELEVATIONS AND THE ROOF PLAN A2.1 BOTH |
| | INDICATE WHAT APPEARSTO BE A ROOF LINE THAT DOES NOT |
| | APPEAR ON SHEET S1-3.0, A DISCREPANCY THAT NEEDS |
| | CLARIFICATION. 106.1.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | JIM WITMER C. B. O. |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II |
| | |
| | TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| | FAX: (561)659-8026 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS |
| | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS |
| | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO |
| | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE |
| | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
