| Date |
Text |
| 2008-10-22 12:11:29 | ***CORRECTIONS - (RESPONSE TO COMMENTS SENT VIA |
| | EMAIL)*** |
| | ***RESUBMITTAL WILL BE ACCEPTED BY EMAIL FOR |
| | PRELIMINARY REVIEW, BUT ORIGINALS REQUIRED FOR REVISION |
| | ISSUANCE*** |
| | |
| | THE EMAIL GIVES THE ENGINEER'S RESPONSES, BUT DOES NOT |
| | STATE HOW HE WILL ADDRESS THE COMMENTS. I ASSUME THAT |
| | HE UNDERSTANDS THAT THE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE IS TO BE |
| | REVISED. PLEASE GIVE THE ENGINEER THE FOLLOWING |
| | INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO YOUR EMAIL: |
| | |
| | 1. PRODUCT APPROVALS GIVE THE PRODUCT'S DESIGN PRESSURE |
| | LIMITATIONS. DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THE JOB ARE TO BE |
| | DETERMINED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. FBC R301. USING |
| | THE DESIGN PRESSURES SPECIFIED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD |
| | (OR TABLE R301.2(2)), THE PRODUCT MUST MEET THE DOR'S |
| | MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 2. A 2/12 PITCH ROOF HAS A ROOF ANGLE OF APPROXIMATELY |
| | 9.46 DEGREES. PROVIDE INFORMATION TO SHOW THAT THE |
| | -57.3PSF "WORST CASE" DECLARED APPLIES TO THE ROOF. SEE |
| | FBC TABLE R301.2(2) AND (3). PLEASE PROVIDE ALL |
| | INFORMATION ON THE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE; FOR INSTANCE, |
| | OPENING SIZE. THE GLAZED ROOF PANELS ARE APPROXIMATELY |
| | 12 SF. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHAT SIZE HURRICANE SHUTTER |
| | PANELS WILL BE INSTALLED. THIS INFORMATION IS REQUIRED |
| | TO DETERMINE DESIGN PRESSURES UNLESS YOU USE "WORST |
| | CASE" FOR ROOF, WHICH WOULD BE -107.69PSF. |
| | |
| | 3. THE SHUTTER CONNECTION DETAIL FL10895 SHOWS |
| | POLYCARBONATE PANELS RATHER THAN ALUMIMUM AS PROPOSED |
| | FOR THIS JOB. ALSO, THE ENGINEERING ADDRESSES WALL |
| | PRESSURES, BUT NOT ROOF PRESSURES. THE FPA IS HELPFUL |
| | BUT ENGINEERING IS STILL REQUIRED AS THE SPECIFICATIONS |
| | OF THE FPA ARE NOT BEING FOLLOWED. |
| | |
| | 4. OK; I HAVEN'T RECEIVED THE SUBMITTAL (NEW NOAS) YET |
| | BUT LOOKED AT IT ON THE INTERNET. THIS APPEARS |
| | ACCEPTABLE, SUBJECT TO RESOLUTION OF ROOF DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES. THE PRODUCT HAS A LIMITATION OF -70PSF. IF |
| | THE ENGINEER CAN JUSTIFY DESIGN PRESSURES OF -70PSF OR |
| | LOWER FOR ROOF COMPONENT & CLADDING, THIS NOA WILL BE |
| | ACCEPTABLE. LET ME KNOW IF YOU NEED ASSISTANCE. |
| | |
| | IT SEEMS THAT THE ONLY OUTSTANDING ISSUE IS THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURE FOR THE ROOF COMPONENTS & CLADDING (STORM |
| | PANELS). PLEASE HAVE THE ENGINEER CLARIFY HOW HE'S |
| | ARRIVED AT -57.3, OR (IF THIS IS FOR WALLS ONLY) |
| | SPECIFY DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THE ROOF COMPONENTS & |
| | CLADDING. THANK YOU AGAIN FOR YOUR CONTINUING |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | REGARDS, |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA M. HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | |
| | CONTRACTOR'S EMAIL, FOR REFERENCE: |
| | |
| | "JOE" |
| | 10/21/2008 02:21 PM |
| | TO |
| | |
| | CC |
| | |
| | SUBJECT |
| | CURRIER SUNROOM PROJECT PERMIT NUMBER 07090673 |
| | |
| | |
| | MS. HILL, |
| | |
| | HOPE ALL IS WELL. I REVIEWED THE COMMENTS WITH MY |
| | ENGINEER AND THESE ARE THE ANSWERS TO THEM I WILL ALSO |
| | BE DROPPING OFF THE 2 PRODUCT APPROVALS ONE FOR THE |
| | PANELS THAT IS NOT EXPIRED AND I DO APOLOGIZE FOR THAT |
| | AND THE OTHER FOR THE SHUTTER CONNECTIONS TO THE |
| | SUNROOM IN WHICH I SPOKE TO YOU ABOUT AND I TOLD YOU I |
| | WOULD GIVE YOU. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS |
| | PLEASE EITHER CALL ME ON MY CELL 516 807 5194 OR E-MAIL |
| | ME AT [email protected] |
| | |
| | COMMENT 1: |
| | PRESSURES ON PAGE 1 OF THE DRAWINGS ARE FOR THE ROOM |
| | DESIGN ONLY. THE STORM PANEL PRESSURES WERE NOT LISTED |
| | ON THE DRAWINGS, SINCE IT WAS THOUGHT TO BE TAKEN CARE |
| | OF WITHIN THE PRODUCT APPROVALS (SEE FL10895 R0 AE |
| | 307005). HOWEVER THE PRESSURES FOR THE STORM PANELS |
| | NEED TO MEET 57.3 PSF FOR 140 MPH EXPOSURE C COMPONENTS |
| | AND CLADDING (WORST CASE DESIGN). |
| | |
| | COMMENT 2: |
| | THE ROOF PITCH OF THIS ROOM IS ROUGHLY 2 ON 12. |
| | |
| | COMMENT 3: |
| | PLEASE NOTE JOE IS CHANGING THE PANEL TO FL-7226.1. |
| | THE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE INCLUDES ONE OPENING WHICH |
| | SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE FOR THE WORST CASE FOR BOTH SIZE |
| | AND PRESSURE DESIGN. THE PRESSURE SHOULD BE 57.3 (+/-). |
| | SHUTTER MOUNTING CONNECTION SHOULD BE BASED ON SECTION |
| | 3 ON SHEET 2. SHUTTER GLASS SEPARATION NEEDS TO BE 3? |
| | MIN. SHUTTER SPAN IS A MAX. OF 8?-6? ON THE GABLE ENDS |
| | AND 6?-10? ON THE FRONT WALLS, INSTALLED VERTICALLY. |
| | MIN. EDGE DISTANCE IS 2? WHICH HAS THE REDUCTION OF |
| | 0.5. THE SPACING IN THE CHART FOR THE 66 PSF, -72 PSF |
| | MAX. PRESSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR TAPCONS INTO CONCRETE AT |
| | THE ?BOTTOM? PORTION OF DETAIL ?3? IS 12? O.C. |
| | THEREFORE AFTER THE REDUCTION THE SCREWS MUST BE 6? |
| | O.C. SPACING MAX. |
| | THE TOP CONNECTION IS BASED ON FL-10895.1, NOT 7226.1. |
| | #10 X 3/4" SELF DRILLING SCREW AT 6? O.C. MAX IS |
| | REQUIRED. THE CALCULATION OF PRESSURES ARE FOUND WITHIN |
| | THE EVALUATION REPORT FL10895 R0 AE 307005. |
| | |
| | COMMENT 4: |
| | JOE HAS NEW NOA FOR PANELS. AND WILL PROVIDE YOU WITH |
| | THE OTHER PRODUCT APPROVAL AS WELL. |
| | |
| | COMMENT 5: |
| | THE GLASS SEPARATION WILL BE 3-1/2? BASED ON THE |
| | EXTRUSION WITH A 3? MAX LEG (DETAIL 3 ON SHEET 1A), AND |
| | THE GLASS SITS BACK OFF THE WALL 1/2". ALTHOUGH WITH |
| | THE NEW PRODUCT REPORT 7226.1 THE SEPARATION NEED ONLY |
| | BE 3?. |
| | |
| | COMMENT 6: |
| | SEE COMMENT 3 RESPONSE WHICH SHOW THE FASTENERS USED |
| | AND THAT THE FACTOR WAS APPLIED TO THE TAPCON. |
| | |
| | COMMENT 7: |
| | THE SUNROOM CAN ACCOMMODATE THE ADDITIONAL PANEL WEIGHT |
| | AND THERE WILL NOT BE ANY WATER INTRUSION ISSUES. |
| | SEE FL-10895.1 AND THE RESPONSE TO COMMENT 3 FOR THE |
| | SCHEDULE OF FASTENERS INTO THE ALUMINUM AT THE TOP |
| | CONNECTION POINT. |
| | |
| | COMMENT 8: |
| | NO ALTERNATIVE DESIGN OPTION NEED BE DISCUSSED. |
| | |
| | |
| | REGARDS, |
| | JOE HERRMANN |
| | |
| | |
