| Date |
Text |
| 2008-03-12 18:06:53 | ** DENIED 3RD REVIEW ** |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE SOME ITEMS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS ARE |
| | STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING.EXAMPLES WERE GIVEN ON |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW HOWEVER NOT ALL ITEMS AS MENTIONED. |
| | PLEASE SEE SOME EXAMPLES ARE GIVEN ONCE AGAIN. |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE ALSO SEE THERE ARE SOME NEW COMMENTS BASED ON |
| | DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED AND/OR CHANGES MADE TO PLANS OR |
| | DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. REVIEW COMMENTS CAN ONLY BE MADE |
| | ON PLANS AND DOCUMENTS REVIEWED. |
| | IN EITHER CASE THE COMMENTS NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PLANS STILL SHOW A PERMANENT |
| | STRUCTURE FOR OUTSIDE EATING ON THE WEST SIDE WHICH BY |
| | GOING OVER WITH ERIC SCHNEIDER FROM ZONING, THIS |
| | STRUCTURE MAY NOT BE BUILT AS SHOWN. THIS WILL AFFECT |
| | ALMOST ALL DOCUMENTS AND PLANS INCLUDING ARCHITECTURAL, |
| | ELECTRICAL, AND PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SUBMITTED PLANS AND ALL DOCUMENTS |
| | WERE GONE THROUGH AND AS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | COMMENT #1, THE OWNER AFFIDAVIT WAS NOT SUBMITTED IN |
| | PACKAGE. |
| | PLEASE SEE FS 553.791(4)( C) |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ONE SHEET OF THE PRIVATE PROVIDER |
| | BUILDING COMPLIANCE FOR MECHANICAL CONTAINS A NOTARY |
| | STAMP AND SIGNATURE OF THIS SHEET HOWEVER THE SHEET |
| | WHICH IS REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED BY THE REVIEWER IS NOT |
| | SIGNED AND IS BLANK? |
| | PLEASE SEE FS 553.791 AS THIS IS REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED |
| | BY THE PLANS EXAMINER AND A NOTARY UNDER FS 117.05 MAY |
| | NOT NOTARIZE A BLANK PAGE WHERE A SIGNATURE IS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE RESPONSE FROM THE DESIGNER FOR |
| | SIGNATURE MENTIONS THE TOP SIGNATURE IS THE ONE TO USE |
| | HOWEVER LETTER IS SIGNED WITH ANOTHER SIGNATURE ALL |
| | TOGETHER.THE LETTER MAY NOT LIST MULTIPLE SIGNATURES |
| | AND NEEDS TO STATE THIS IS THE LEGAL SIGNATURE. THE |
| | LETTER WILL BE PLACED IN SIGNATURE FILE. |
| | FS 471.025 |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COMMENTS BELOW WITH RESPECT TO |
| | ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLANS |
| | FOR LIGHTING WHICH DO NOT CORRELATE. PLEASE SEE SHEET |
| | A2.2 SPECIFICALLY WHICH DOES NOT SHOW THE REVISED |
| | LIGHTING FOR EMERGENCY LIGHTS, EXIT LIGHTS WHICH MANY |
| | WERE ADDED AND SOME WERE REMOVED OR RELOCATED. ONE |
| | EXAMPLE GIVEN: SEE THE AREA IN KITCHEN JUST TO THE LEFT |
| | OF THE LIQUOR STORAGE ROOM #121 WHICH ON ELECTRICAL |
| | PLANS THE EXIT LIGHT WAS REMOVED. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE NEW UPDATED ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS NOW |
| | CONTAIN COMPLETELY DIFFERENT SIGNATURES THAN THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED PLANS? |
| | PLEASE SEE THE PRINTED LICENSE NUMBER OF THE ARCHITECT |
| | WHICH MAY SIMPLY BE ADDED TO TITLE BLOCKS ON ANY SHEETS |
| | WHICH DO NOT NEED TO BE RE-PRINTED. THIS IS GIVEN AS A |
| | NEW COMMENT DUE TO THE A-SHEETS NOT CORRELATING WITH |
| | ELECTRICAL. THIS WAS A COMMENT FROM OTHER TRADES ON |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW(S) AND IS GIVEN FOR INFORMATION AND IS |
| | REQUIRED EVEN IF COMMENT IS NOT MADE BY OTHER |
| | TRADE(S). |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH RESPECT TO |
| | EGRESS LIGHTING REQUIRED TO MEET MINIMUM LEVELS PER THE |
| | LIFE SAFETY CODE. 7.8 AND 7.9. THE RESPONSE MENTIONS |
| | THIS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND |
| | WILL NEED TO PERFORM READINGS OF LIGHTING LEVELS AT THE |
| | END OF THE PROJECT. THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE AS THIS IS |
| | NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND IS THE |
| | RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. PLEASE SEE |
| | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G15-33.004 WITH RESPECT |
| | TO MINIMUM RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE ENGINEER. |
| | IF THE LIGHTING IN AREAS OF CONCERNS WERE NOT ON |
| | DIMMING PANELS AND ALL A PART OF NORMAL LIGHTING AS |
| | SHOWN ON PLANS THIS WOULD NOT BE OF CONCERN. THEFACT |
| | THAT THE PLANS CONTAINS LIGHTING ON DIMMING PANELS AND |
| | THERE IS NO INFORMATION ON A STARTING LIGHTING LEVEL |
| | POINT AND NO INFORMATION ON THE MINIMUM LEVEL IN WHICH |
| | EGRESS LIGHTING IN ALL PATHS WILL BE DIMMED TO, THIS |
| | SHALL BE ADDRESSED AT THIS TIME. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON LEVELS, DIMMING ETC. |
| | PLEASE SEE7.8.1.3, 7.8.1.4 WHICH REQUIRES 1FT CANDLE |
| | MINIMUM NO DESIGNATED AREA TO FALL BELOW 2.2 LUX OR .02 |
| | FT CANDLES WITH THE FAILURE OF ANY ONE UNIT. PLEASE SEE |
| | SOUTHEAST CORNER OF DINING AREA FOR ONE EXAMPLE AS THE |
| | LEVELS SHOWN ON PHOTO-METRIC PLANS FOR THAT AREA ARE |
| | ALREADY LOW AND APPEARS IT WILL FALL BELOW MINIMUM AS |
| | ONLY ONE UNIT IS SHOWN ON PLANS FOR THAT AREA. |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE |
| | WHICH MENTIONED VERSION 3.0 OF FLA-COMM COULD NOT BE |
| | USED WAS AS FOLLOWS AND IS QUOTED FROM DESIGNER'S |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | * |
| | BUILDING OFFICIALS: ENERGY GAUGE SUMMIT VERSION 3.0 AND |
| | 3.1 SATISFIES THE REQUIREMENTS IN 13-400.3.A AND |
| | 13-400.3.B (GENERATED BY FLA/COM-2004 COMPUTER PROGRAM, |
| | VERSION 2.5).* |
| | * |
| | PLEASE SEE THIS IS EXACTLY THE WORDING ON THE STATE |
| | WEBSITE. PLEASE READ WHAT THE STATEMENT SAYS, THE |
| | VERSION 3.0 AND 3.1 *ENERGY GAUGE SUMMIT* GENERATED BY |
| | THE FLA/COM 2004 COMPUTER PROGRAM, * VERSION 2.5*. |
| | THESE MEANS IT IS STILL THE VERSION 2.5 AS TITLED IN |
| | PROGRAM AND YOU WILL SEE THE ENERGY GAUGE SUMMIT 3.0 OR |
| | 3.1 ON THE LAST LINE OF SHEET. |
| | NOW THE SUBMITTED CALCULATIONS DO SHOW THE 2.5 HOWEVER |
| | SAYS ENERGY GAUGE SUMMIT 3.14. |
| | THE MECHANICAL REVIEW STATED IN THE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | THAT METHOD *B* WAS NOT AN OPTION FOR MECHANICAL REVIEW |
| | AND TO ADDRESS NOTE #17. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS ELECTRICAL REVIEWS GAVE |
| | SECTIONS 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3 FOR |
| | PRESCRIPTIVE REQUIREMENTS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THAT NOT ALL LIGHTING ON PLANS COORDINATE |
| | WITH THE LIGHTING ON FIXTURE SCHEDULE ALONG WITH |
| | LIGHTING IN THE INPUT DATA REPORT. |
| | EXAMPLE: WOMEN AND MEN BATH ROOMS, DIMMING PANELS |
| | CLEARLY SHOW VANITY LIGHTING IN THESE AREAS YET NOT IN |
| | THE IDR. |
| | EXAMPLE: MECHANICAL ROOM WHICH IS NOTED AS ROOM 129 ON |
| | PLANS WHICH IS BEING ASSUMED AS THE ROOM WHICH IS |
| | LABELED AS STORAGE ON IDR. |
| | EXAMPLE: FIXTURE U, WHICH FIXTURE LEGEND STATES 75W |
| | TRANSFORMER MONO-POINT USE. |
| | EXAMPLE: UMBRELLA LIGHTS ON DIMMING PANEL CIRCUIT 24. |
| | WHAT ARE THESE FIXTURES, WHERE ARE THEY IN THE IDR, HOW |
| | ARE THEY FIGURED? |
| | THESE CALCULATIONS MAY ONLY BE FOR ELECTRICAL LIGHTING |
| | AND MAY NOT TRADE OFF ANY OTHER ITEMS SUCH AS BUILDING |
| | SYSTEMS ETC. |
| | THIS SECTION13-101.1.3 APPLIES TO RENOVATIONS WHICH |
| | THIS DOES NOT FALL UNDER AND ONLY 13-415.2 APPLIES AND |
| | ITS ADOPTED SECTIONS THERETO. |
| | PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE EFFECTIVE WATTAGE IS LESS THAN |
| | DESIGN AND DESIGN IS HIGHER THAN THE ALLOWANCE. PLEASE |
| | EXPLAIN HOW THE DESIGN WATTAGE ON COMPLIANCE SUMMARY |
| | SHEET IS NOT THE SAME AS DESIGN WATTAGE ON LIGHTING |
| | COMPLIANCE SHEET. |
| | PLEASE SEE SECTION ABOVE AS THIS IS NOT A TRADE OFF FOR |
| | OTHER COMPONENTS. |
| | ** AS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW, PLEASE GO OVER ALL |
| | LIGHTING ON PLANS, PLEASE BE SURE THE SPECIFIC |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3 ARE |
| | MET. |
| | ** PLEASE SEE AS MENTIONED ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | PLEASE BE SURE THE OWNER AGENT IS SIGNED ON THE |
| | CERTIFICATION SHEETS. THIS DOES NOT MEAN THE NAME SHALL |
| | BE TYPE WRITTEN ON SHEETS, THIS REQUIRES A SIGNATURE. |
| | PLEASE BE SURE AS MENTIONED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW THE |
| | CERTIFICATION SHEET CONTAINS THE SIGNATURE AND SEAL |
| | FROM THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL.13-103.1., FBC 106.1.2 |
| | ADMIN SECTION. |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COMPLIANCE FOR 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, |
| | .1.2 AND .1.3 HAVE NOT BEEN ACHIEVED FOR ALL LIGHTING |
| | AS REQUIRED. |
| | THERE ARE LOCATIONS ON PLANS WHICH STILL ONLY SHOW A |
| | STANDARD METHOD OF CONTROL WHEN THE CODE REQUIRES |
| | AUTOMATED SHUT OFF. SOME AREAS WERE GIVEN AS EXAMPLES |
| | ON PREVIOUS REVIEW AND NOTED AS ALSO SEE OTHER AREAS. |
| | PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE WITH RESPECT TO SOME OF THE |
| | FIXTURES NOTED WHICH WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE IDR. ONE |
| | FOR EXAMPLE WAS FIXTURE *P* WHICH WAS GIVEN. PLEASE SEE |
| | HOST AREA WHICH SHOWS FIXTURE *P* ABOVE ARE WHICH |
| | CONTAINS A STANDARD DIMMING SWITCH AND DOES NOT GO TO |
| | ANY CIRCUITING, CONTROLS, DIMMING PANEL ETC? THE PLANS |
| | DO CONTAIN NOTES #9 AND #10 HOWEVER THEY MENTION TO SEE |
| | E2.1 FOR CONTINUATION HOWEVER 2.1 DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY |
| | CONTROL OR CIRCUITING INFORMATION. PLEASE EXPLAIN AND |
| | SHOW HOW THE OCCUPANT CAN SEE ALL LIGHTING WHICH IS |
| | BEING CONTROLLED AS THIS PROPOSED CONTROL IS AT ONE |
| | LOCATION. HOW WILL SYSTEM MEET IDENTIFICATION AND PILOT |
| | LIGHTS REQUIRED? |
| | PLEASE SEE BAR RELAY PANEL MENTIONS THIS BEING A RELAY |
| | PANEL HOWEVER THE CIRCUITS IN THIS PANEL ARE SHOWN FROM |
| | PANEL L1 AND NO OVER RIDES OR TIMES COULD BE FOUND. |
| | EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE PLANS STILL INDICATE LIGHTING IN |
| | MEN'S AND WOMEN'S BATHROOM WITH NO SEPARATE SPACE OVER |
| | RIDE CONTROLS. SOME LIGHTING WAS NOW PLACED ON |
| | OCCUPANCY SENSORS HOWEVER SEE DIMMING PANEL WHICH STILL |
| | LIST LIGHTS IN BOTH OF THESE LOCATIONS. |
| | ** PLEASE VERIFY LISTING OF MARLIN PANELS AND MATRIX |
| | CONTROLLERS. AS THE SYSTEM ON PLANS WAS NOT COMPLETE |
| | SOME RESEARCH OF SYSTEM COMPONENTS WAS DONE AND EVEN AS |
| | EACH MAY BE LISTED, COULD NOT LOCATE THESE AS A LISTED |
| | ASSEMBLY OR SYSTEM. PLEASE PROVIDE TECHNICAL SPECS/CUT |
| | SHEETS FOR THIS PER 110.3, 90.7. THESE ARE NOW BEING |
| | REQUESTED AS THE INFORMATION FOR LABELING, PILOT LIGHTS |
| | ETC HAS NOT BEEN CLEAR ALONG WITH CONTROLS. |
| | |
| | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTES WITH RESPECT |
| | TO TRACK LIGHTING LOADS AND HOW THEY WERE FIGURED INTO |
| | SERVICE PER 220.43B. THE DIMMING PANELS NOW SHOW THE VA |
| | PER TWO FT HOWEVER THE LOADS ARE STILL SHOWN AT 1.0 |
| | FACTOR. ARE THESE NOT CONTINUOUS LOADS? |
| | 125%, 215.3, 230.42 ETC PLEASE ADJUST. |
| | |
| | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW GAVE NOTICE TO |
| | FLORIDA STATUES 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO REPEAT |
| | COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. AT THIS TIME AS REQUIRED |
| | UNDER FLORIDA STATUTES, THIS OFFICE HAS ASSESSED THE |
| | FEE AS REQUIRED WHICH IS REQUIRED TO BE PAID BEFORE THE |
| | PLANS MAY BE RESUBMITTED. PLEASE BE SURE TO GO OVER |
| | COMMENTS, IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT |
| | THIS OFFICE/REVIEWER TO GO OVER COMMENTS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE FEE OF $18, 600 WILL BE DUE UPON |
| | RESUBMITTING OF PLANS. |
| | ** ONE SET OF ELECTRICAL PLANS ALONG WITH ONE COPY OF |
| | THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE BEING RETAINED BY |
| | THIS OFFICE. |
| | |
| | ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY |
| | COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE |
| | DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. |
| | PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | * ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR |
| | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS |
| | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT |
| | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY |
| | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, |
| | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO |
| | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS |
| | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY |
| | DELAYS. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| 2008-03-11 19:37:58 | |
| | |
| | ** REVIEW WILL GO INTO A FAILED STATUS. NOTES TO FOLLOW |
| | ONCE COMPLETED. |
