| Date |
Text |
| 2008-03-18 11:04:38 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 07090648 |
| | ADD: 700 S ROSEMARY AVE# 100 |
| | CONT: IN MOTION BUILDERS, INC. |
| | TEL: (954)698-0900 |
| | MARCH 18/2008 |
| | |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1A) --- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- |
| | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & |
| | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL |
| | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH |
| | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE |
| | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE |
| | FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR |
| | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | 1B)PLEASE SUBMIT 2 OF ALL SURVEYS, PLANS, REPORTS, |
| | REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR SUBMITTALS FOR |
| | REVIEW FOR PERMIT. IF YOUR PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A |
| | RESIDENT INSPECTOR OR IF YOUR PROJECT IS A THRESHOLD |
| | BUILDING REQUIRING A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR THEN (3) THREE |
| | SETS OF ALL SAID DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE. 106.1* /2004 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS WEST PALM |
| | BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. |
| | |
| | 1C) 106.1.1* W.P.B. ADMINISTRATIVE CODE/2004 DRAWINGS & |
| | SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN THE FORM |
| | OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS, |
| | WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY WITH THE |
| | TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE SPECIFIC TO |
| | THE TECHNICAL CODES "SHALL NOT BE CITED AS A WHOLE OR |
| | IN PART, NOR THE TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS EQUIVALENT BE USED |
| | AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC INFORMATION". CONSTRUCTION |
| | DOCUMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE |
| | LOCATION, NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND |
| | SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS |
| | OF THIS CODE AND RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND |
| | REGULATIONS, AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| | |
| | 1D ) FL S S 713.13 NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED |
| | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT. NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE |
| | WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS NOT |
| | ACTUALLY COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING |
| | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) |
| | THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. 2)SHEET |
| | T1.1,CODE ANALYSIS PLEASE UPDATE THE 2004 TO THE 2007 |
| | FBC, BUILDING WITH 2007 REVISIONS. |
| | |
| | 1E) NEW COMMENT, PLANS INDICATE A NEW COVERED PATIO |
| | AREA BUT THE PERMIT APPLICATION |
| | (DUPLICATE) INDICATES ?ONLY INTERIOR WORK? WHICH IS |
| | CORRECT? THIS GREATLY AFFECTS THE SCOPE OF WHAT WORK |
| | WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED UNDER THIS PERMIT AND REVIEW. |
| | SINCE THE FIRST 2 REVIEWS WERE REVIEWED WITH THE |
| | COVERED PATIO ADDITION AS PART OF THE PERMIT SCOPE THIS |
| | REVIEW WILL ALSO INCLUDE THIS SAME SCOPE OF WORK. IF |
| | THE EXTERIOR COVERED PATIO IS NOT PART OF THIS PERMIT |
| | IT SHOULD NOT SHOW UP ON THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 2-9) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 10) STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS WERE RESUBMITTED, |
| | STRUCTURAL DESIGN CALCULATIONS ARE MISSING A SIGNED AND |
| | SEALED INDEX SHEET INDICATING WHAT WORK IS COVERED IN |
| | THIS REPORT.. FL S S 471.025. |
| | |
| | 11A) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 11B) 3RD REQUEST FROM PREVIOUS AUDITS,*** WPB AMENDMENT |
| | 105.13.6. W.P.B. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | REQUEST FOR THRESHOLD BUILDINGS A SPECIAL INSPECTOR AS |
| | REQUIRED BY S. 553.79(5) FLORIDA STATUTES TO THE |
| | MINIMUM INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY THIS CODE. CONTACT |
| | HAROLD PISKURA MANAGER OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR PROGRAM |
| | AT (561) 805-6711 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION BEFORE THE |
| | PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED. |
| | |
| | 11C) 3RD REQUEST FROM PREVIOUS AUDITS,*** W.P.B. |
| | AMENDMENT 105.13.4.4 ALL PLANS FOR THE BUILDING WHICH |
| | ARE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT |
| | OR ENGINEER OF RECORD CONTAIN A STATEMENT THAT, TO THE |
| | BEST OF THE ARCHITECT'S PR ENGINEER'S KNOWLEDGE, THE |
| | PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE |
| | FIRE-SAFETY STANDARDS AS DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL |
| | AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION AND 633 |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| | |
| | 12) 3RD REQUEST FROM PREVIOUS AUDITS,*** THE STRUCTURAL |
| | SHEET S0.0 FOUNDATION DESIGN INDICATES THERE TO BE A |
| | GEOTECHNICAL SOILS ENGINEER SHALL VERIFY THAT THE SOILS |
| | OF THE DESIGN BEARING CAPACITY HAVE BEEN ENCOUNTERED. |
| | 1802.2.1 QUESTIONABLE SOIL. WHERE THE SAFE-SUSTAINING |
| | POWER OF THE SOIL IS IN DOUBT, OR WHERE A LOAD-BEARING |
| | VALUE SUPERIOR TO THAT SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE IS |
| | CLAIMED, THE BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL REQUIRE THAT THE |
| | NECESSARY INVESTIGATION BE MADE. SUCH INVESTIGATION |
| | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 1802.4 |
| | THROUGH 1802.6 . |
| | |
| | 13-16) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 17) 3RDD REQUEST FROM PREVIOUS AUDITS,*** FL BLD CODE |
| | 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES (FOR |
| | THRESHOLD BUILDINGS (3 COPIES) OF PRODUCT TESTING |
| | REPORTS ,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: |
| | |
| | 17A) FIXED WINDOWS, STOREFRONT, FL COVERSHEET ONLY |
| | SUBMITTED |
| | PLANS CALL FOR LARGE MISSILE IMPACT RATED GLAZING, THE |
| | FL# 6001.1 |
| | IS FOR NON-RATED SYSTEM REQUIRING STORM SHUTTERS OR |
| | ROLL DOWN SYSTEM |
| | |
| | 17B) GLAZED EXTERIOR SWING DOOR, SINGLE AND PAIRS FL |
| | COVERSHEET SUBMITTED, NON-IMPACT |
| | |
| | 17C) DOORS W/ SIDELIGHTS, FL COVERSHEET |
| | ONLY SUBMITTED, PLANS CALL FOR LARGE MISSILE IMPACT |
| | RATED GLAZING, THE FL# 7237.1 & 7237.2 IS FOR NON-RATED |
| | IMPACT SYSTEM REQUIRING STORM SHUTTERS OR ROLL DOWN |
| | SYSTEM , |
| | THE ROLL-DOWN SYSTEM IS NOT FOUND IN THE SECTION |
| | DETAILS, THERE ARE HEATERS FOUND IN SOME OF THESE |
| | AREAS. |
| | |
| | 17D) FOLDING DOOR SYSTEM FL COVERSHEET ONLY SUBMITTED. |
| | FL 6859.1 IMPACT RATED, A +/- |
| | 75 PSF BUT IN NON WIND BORNE DEBRIS REGION. |
| | |
| | 17D) FOLDING WALL SYSTEM FL 2947.2FL COVERSHEET |
| | SUBMITTED. .NANA WALL SYSTEM- FBC 2001 FBC NOT 2004FBC, |
| | SEE RESTRICTIONS PLANS INDICATE 13?-0? OPENINGS WITH 4 |
| | EQUAL PANELS, RESTRICTION SIZE IS LIMITED TO 3?-0?. SEE |
| | REPORT NOT SUBMITTED!!! |
| | |
| | 17E) HURRICANE SHUTTER, HORIZONTAL ROLLER, FL |
| | COVERSHEET ONLY SUBMITTED, PLANS INDICATE LARGE MISSILE |
| | ON THE EGRESS DOOR BUT THE FL NUMBERS SUBMITTED ARE FOR |
| | NON-RATED GLAZING BLOCKING REQUIRED EXITS WITH STORM |
| | SHUTTER OR ROLL DOWN SHUTTER SYSTEMS. |
| | |
| | 17F) TRUSS ANCHOR TYPE HARDWARE, FL COVERSHEET |
| | SUBMITTED, OK WILL USE VALUES FROM CATALOG |
| | NO 1/3RD STEEL INCREASES TAKEN COLUMN. |
| | |
| | 17G) LOUVER, FL COVERSHEET SUBMITTED THE REPORT NOT |
| | SUBMITTED WILL SHOW THIS TO BE A NON- |
| | RATED WALL LOUVER, SEE 1609.1.4(5). |
| | |
| | 17H) ROOFING ASSEMBLIES W / INSULATION, FL COVERSHEET |
| | SUBMITTED ONLY, THE REPORT NOT SUBMITTED WILL INDICATE |
| | THAT THIS SYSTEM IS TO BE USED FOR APPLICATION TO A |
| | PLYWOOD DECK. |
| | BOTH THE ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL SHEETS INDICATE |
| | THE USE OF A METAL DECK, PLEASE SEE |
| | PLANS FOR DETAILS. |
| | |
| | 18) 3RD REQUEST FROM PREVIOUS AUDITS,*** PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER |
| | OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION PLEASE SEE THE |
| | STATE WEBSITE AT WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH |
| | STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A |
| | COVER SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM |
| | THE STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE |
| | APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL OR SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. |
| | |
| | 19) 3RD REQUEST FROM PREVIOUS AUDITS,*** WPB ADMIN CODE |
| | 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE |
| | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND |
| | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO |
| | SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | FL 61G1-23.015 (2)*** THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR |
| | SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS, |
| | SHOP DRAWINGS ETC... |
| | WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT |
| | WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED |
| | AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR |
| | TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 20)3RD REQUEST FROM PREVIOUS AUDITS,*** SHEET EX1.1 |
| | INDICATES POINTS WHERE THE EXIT IS 3?-8? BUT THE WIDTH |
| | OF THE EGRESS PATH MAY BE AS LITTLE AS 30? IN SOME |
| | AREAS, PLEASE PROVIDE THE EGRESS PATH SHOWING THE FULL |
| | 44? WHERE IT SERVES AN OCCUPANT LOAD GREATER THAN 50 |
| | AND 36? WHERE REQUIRED FOR LESS THAN 50. 1024.9.1.1 THE |
| | MINIMUM WIDTH OF AISLES SERVING SEATING AT TABLES SHALL |
| | BE 44 INCHES (1118 MM). EXCEPTION: THIRTY-SIX INCHES |
| | (914 MM) WHERE SERVING AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF NOT MORE |
| | THAN 50. |
| | |
| | THERE ARE STILL AREAS ON THE EGRESS PLAN THAT WILL NOT |
| | MEET THE MINIMUM CLEARANCES PENCILED IN AREAS OF |
| | CONCERN. |
| | |
| | 21-23) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 24) BUILDING PROVISO: A6.4 DETAIL # 2 & S5.0 FOR A |
| | BRUSHED ALUMINUM CANOPY, THIS WILL REQUIRE SHOP |
| | DRAWINGS, TO BE UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. THIS STRUCTURE |
| | DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF 3105, MUST MEET THE |
| | 140 MPH PROVISIONS OF 1609.6. |
| | |
| | 25) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS, 3RD REVIEW: |
| | |
| | 26) THE NEW SHEET A8.1 DOES NOT HAVE THE STAMP FROM |
| | CAPRI INDICATING CODE COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 27) THE NEW SHEET A8.1 THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL JAMES R |
| | LENCIONI, ARCHITECT PUT THE EXPIRATION DATE OF HIS |
| | LICENSE ON THIS SHEET NOT THE DATE IT WAS DRAWN OR |
| | CHANGES MADE. |
| | |
| | 61G1-16.004 FL. ADMIN. CODE. PLANS PREPARED BY A |
| | REGISTERED ARCHITECT SHALL INCLUDE A TITLE BLOCK WHICH |
| | MUST: |
| | - STATE THE FIRM NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER |
| | - STATE THE FIRM LICENSE NUMBER |
| | - STATE PROJECT NAME OR IDENTIFICATION |
| | XX - STATE DATE PREPARED |
| | XX - INCLUDE AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND DATED SEAL - |
| | INCLUDE THE PRINTED NAME OF THE |
| | ARCHITECT SEALING THE PLANS |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | A THOROUGH REVIEW CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A |
| | RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF |
| | THIS REVIEW. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | *** CHAPTER 553.80(2)(B) FLORIDA STATUTES STATES THAT A |
| | LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE |
| | FEE FOR PLAN REVIEW, IF PLANS ARE REJECTED THREE OR |
| | MORE TIMES FOR REPEATED FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE |
| | VIOLATION. |
| | |
| | JIM WITMER C. B. O. |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II |
| | |
| | TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| | FAX: (561)659-8026 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS |
| | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS |
| | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO |
| | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE |
| | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
