| Date |
Text |
| 2008-05-22 13:42:31 | ** DENIED 3RD REVIEW** |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: THE NOTES BELOW ARE THE SAME COMMENTS AS THE |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW. AS THE SAME PLANS WERE RE-SUBMITTED |
| | WIHT NO CORRECTIONS THE SAME COMMENTS APPLY. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE A FEE HAS NOW BEEN ASSESSED AS |
| | REQUIRED PER FS 553.80(2)(B) FOR REPEAT CODE COMPLIANCE |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ONE OF THE COMMENTS BELOW FROM |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH RESPECTTO VALUE WAS IN A |
| | RESPONSE LETTER WHICH MENTIONS VALUE FOR COMPLETE SCOPE |
| | WAS INCREASED HOWEVER THIS WAS NOT DONE WHEN PLANS WERE |
| | RESUBMITTEED. THE APPLICAITON WAS NOT CHANGED ETC. THIS |
| | VALUE HAS BEEN CHANGED AND FEES WILL BE DUE BEFORE |
| | RESUBMITTING PLANS. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: TOTAL FEES DUE INCLUDING NOTES 2 AND 3 IS |
| | $5,400 |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS WHICH ARE |
| | IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING CODES ARE NOT |
| | ACCURATE ON PLANS. IF THIS WAS THE ONLY COMMENT THESE |
| | COULD HAVE BEEN RED-LINED HOWEVER PLANS ARE COMING BACK |
| | FOR OTHER COMMENTS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING CODES SHALL BE STATED. 2002 |
| | NFPA-110. (PLANS STATE 2005 NFPA-110 WHICH DOES NOT |
| | EXIST). |
| | 2003 NFPA-101. (PLANS STATE 2005 NFPA-101WHICH DOES NOT |
| | EXIST). |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE VALUE FOR THE COMPLETE APPLIED |
| | SCOPE OF DOES NOT MEET THE TABLES FOR THE SCOPE OF WORK |
| | FOR ALL TRADES. |
| | PLEASE SE RESPONSE LETTER MENTIONS THE APPLIED VALUE IS |
| | NOW $200K HOWEVER THE PERMIT APPLICATION, THE RE-SUB |
| | COVER SHEET ETC WAS NOT UPDATED, |
| | FBC 108.3 |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE SPECS/MANUFACTURES CUT SHEETS |
| | SUBMITTED DO NOT CORRELATE WITH PLANS. |
| | THESE INDICATE A KOHLER ATS AND THE PLANS NOW INDICATE |
| | CUTLER HAMMER. |
| | WHICH ONE WILL BE INSTALLED? |
| | PLEASE SEE THAT IN EITHER CASE THE SPECIFICATIONS ON |
| | PLANS ARE NOT EASILY READ AND ARE *BLURRY* TO READ |
| | DETAILS REQUIRED. |
| | PLEASE SEE NEC 225.31-225.39 AS THE DISCONNECTING MEANS |
| | IS NOT READILY AVAILABLE BASED ON PLANS SUBMITTED. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE SECTIONS MENTIONED ABOVE AS THE |
| | DISCONNECTING MEANS SHALL BE RATED FOR THE LOAD SERVED |
| | AND SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE OUTSIDE OF EQUIPMENT WITH |
| | OUT EXPOSING ANY INDIVIDUAL TO LIVE PARTS. 110.27. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE PICTURE DOES APPEAR TO SHOW TWO BREAKERS |
| | HOWEVER DOES NOT APPEAR TO MEET CODE AS STATED ABOVE. |
| | THIS IS BASED ON PLANS SUBMITTED AND THE TWO SETS OF |
| | DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO |
| | REPEAT CODE COMPLIANT COMMENTS. THIS IS ONLY A NOTICE |
| | GIVEN AT THIS TIME. |
| | ** PLANS MAY BE RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE. |
| | |
| | |
| | ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY |
| | COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE |
| | DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. |
| | PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR |
| | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS |
| | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT |
| | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY |
| | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, |
| | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO |
| | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS |
| | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY |
| | DELAYS. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
