| Date |
Text |
| 2008-04-01 10:05:42 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL |
| | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FSFLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | 1A. WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE |
| | REVISION AND REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. |
| | A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW |
| | COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION |
| | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE |
| | THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOU |
| | PERMIT.THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, SEE A3, PRESSURES WERE ADDED BUT NOT |
| | CLOUDED.IT APPEARS THAT POSSIBLY OTHER CHANGES WERE |
| | MADE TO THE PLANS BUT NOT CLOUDED AND NUMBERED.PLEASE |
| | CLEARLY INDICATE ALL CHANGES TO THE PLAN TO EXPEDITE |
| | THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS.OTHERWISE A COMPLETELY NEW |
| | REVIEW IS REQUIRED, RATHER THAN CHECKING ONLY THINGS |
| | WHICH HAVE CHANGED FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW.SEE ITEM |
| | 16 AND SHEET S10.FAILURE TO CLOUD ALL CHANGES |
| | REQUIRES A COMPLETELY NEW REVIEW FOR EACH PAGE, EVERY |
| | DETAIL, EVERY NOTE.NOTE THAT A COMPLETE REVIEW WAS |
| | NOT DONE AS CHANGES WERE NOT CLOUDED.PLEASE CLOUD ALL |
| | CHANGES ON THE PLAN WHICH WERE DONE AFTER THE FIRST |
| | SUBMITTAL AND THOSE CHANGES WILL BE REVIEWED IN THE |
| | NEXT REVIEW. |
| | |
| | OLD SHEETS WERE NOT SUBMITTED.THIS IS REQUIRED FOR |
| | REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | 1B. ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 1C. FBC*106.1.1, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO BE |
| | SPECIFIC AND CANNOT REFER TO CODE SECTIONS IN LIEU OF |
| | DESIGN CRITERIA. |
| | |
| | 2.THIS REVIEW IS A PLAN REVIEW, OR MAJOR WORKING |
| | DRAWING REVIEW.THIS PROJECT WILL REMAIN IN FAILED |
| | STATUS UNTIL APPLICATION FOR PERMIT BY A CONTRACTOR |
| | LICENSED TO PERFORM OR SUPERVISE THE WORK.IF THE |
| | PERMIT IS NOT APPLIED FOR PRIOR TO OCTOBER 1, 2008, |
| | GOVERNING CODE WILL BE FBC2007 RATHER THAN FBC2004 WITH |
| | 2007 REVISIONS/SUPPLEMENTS AS CURRENTLY DESIGNED. |
| | |
| | 3-8C. ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 8D. ENGINEER STATES THAT THIS IS AN UNOCCUPIED |
| | BUILDING.SEE FBC1004.1, ALL BUILDINGS ARE TO COMPLY |
| | WITH EGRESS REQUIREMENTS BASED ON THE GREATER OF EITHER |
| | DESIGN LOAD (IN THIS CASE, ZERO FOR UNOCCUPIED) OR THE |
| | OCCUPANT LOAD BASED ON FBC TABLE 1004.1.DESIGNER |
| | CANNOT DECLARE AN OCCUPANT LOAD LESS THAN REQUIRED IN |
| | FBC TABLE 1004.1, SEE FBC1004.1. PLEASE DECLARE |
| | OCCUPANT LOAD. |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE FBC1001.1, SCOPE; THE BUILDING IS REQUIRED |
| | TO HAVE AN OCCUPANT LOAD DECLARED BUT THE STORAGE TANK |
| | WOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED A BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 8E-G.ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 8H. SQUARE FOOT AREA FOR THE BUILDING WAS PROVIDED. |
| | PLEASE ALSO PROVIDE SQUARE FOOT AREA FOOTPRINT OF THE |
| | TANK. |
| | |
| | 9-11. PRODUCT APPROVALS, ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 12.ENGINEER'S RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS ARE ATTACHED.SEE THE PREVIOUS LIST |
| | REGARDING INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR ROOF PERMITS.THIS |
| | INFORMATION MAY BE PROVIDED AT THE TIME OF ROOF PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION.ROOF DESIGN PRESSURES ON S2 ARE -40.5, |
| | -67.9, -102.2. |
| | |
| | 13-14. I WAS ABLE TO LOCATE THE IMPORTANCE FACTOR OF |
| | 1.15 ON S1 BUT THIS WAS NOT CLOUDED.ALL WIND DESIGN |
| | CRITERIA (INCLUDING IMPORTANCE FACTOR) IS REQUIRED ON |
| | THE PLANS, FBC1603.ALL CHANGES SHOULD BE CLEARLY |
| | INDICATED AND THE OLD SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR |
| | REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | 15. ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 16. ENGINEER'S RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THE STAIR |
| | RISER AND TREAD DIMENSIONS HAVE BEEN ADDED TO SHEET |
| | S10.I WAS ABLE TO LOCATE THE DIMENSIONS BUT PLEASE |
| | NOTE THAT THIS CHANGE WAS NOT CLOUDED.SEE OTHER |
| | COMMENTS REGARDING CHANGES TO THE PLAN. |
| | 17-18. ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 19. ENGINEER?S RESPONSE WAS THAT THE TANK MANUFACTURER |
| | IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN.THIS PERMIT WILL BE |
| | ISSUED WITH A PROVISO THAT STRUCTURAL INFORMATION BE |
| | PROVIDED FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. |
| | |
| | 20. ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 21.ROOF PLAN A2, NORTH AND EAST ELEVATIONS A3, SHOW |
| | HANDRAILS.GUARDS ARE TO COMPLY WITH FBC 1012.5 AND |
| | 1607.PLEASE REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE DESIGN CRITERIA. A |
| | NOTE ON S9 STATES THAT THE RAIL WILL COMPLY WITH |
| | "APPLICABLE CODE REQUIREMENTS".SEE COMMENT 1C, DESIGN |
| | CRITERIA IS TO BE SPECIFIC AND CANNOT REFER TO "CODE" |
| | EITHER GENERALLY OR BY CODE NUMBER. NEW DETAIL ADDED TO |
| | PLAN. |
| | |
| | 22.S10, THE HANDRAIL HEIGHT IS SHOWN GRAPHICALLY AS |
| | SHORTER THAN THE GUARDRAIL.42INCH MINIMUM IS REQUIRED |
| | AS THE HANDRAIL ALSO ACTS AS A GUARDRAIL.PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY (ADD REQUIRED DIMENSION) OR REVISE. SEE |
| | FBC1009.NEW DETAIL ADDED TO PLAN. |
| | |
| | 23. CLARIFY S1 DESIGN DATA, N.3.C., EXPOSURE B |
| | DECLARED.SEE FBC1609.4.3, THIS APPEARS TO BE EXPOSURE |
| | C.NOTE THAT THE DEFINITION FOR EXPOSURE C CHANGED |
| | EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 8, 2006. |
| | |
| | 24.WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE INCLUDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH ITEM WAS ADDRESSED.ALSO |
| | PLEASE CLOUD AND NUMBER ALL CHANGES AND SUBMIT OLD |
| | SHEETS FOR REFERENCE (FIRST AND SECOND REVIEWS).IT |
| | APPEARS THAT THIS WAS NOT DONE AS SEVERAL REVISIONS |
| | WERE NOT CLOUDED BASED ON ENGINEER?S RESPONSE (STATING |
| | THAT THESE ITEMS WERE ADDED OR REVISED) AND FIRST |
| | REVIEW.TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, ALL |
| | CHANGES ARE TO BE CLEARLY INDICATED. |
| | |
