| Date |
Text |
| 2007-10-02 16:07:38 | |
| | |
| | DENIED |
| | |
| | 1)PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS DESIGN PARAMETERS SHALL |
| | COMPLY WITH THE 2004 FLORIDA BLDG CODE WITH 2006 |
| | AMENDMENTS PER 106.1.1 FBC* |
| | |
| | 2)IN AN EXISTING BUILDING WHERE ALTERATIONS ARE BEING |
| | MADE A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL MUST ELECT THE LEVEL OF |
| | ALTERATION PER 301.5 OF EXISTING BUILDING CODE AND |
| | STATE ALONG WITH THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ON THE |
| | DRAWINGS |
| | |
| | 3)THE CLAIMED VALUATION ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS |
| | LOW. FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS |
| | AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE THE TOTAL REPLACEMENT COST |
| | EXCLUDING LAND VALUE. OUR VALUATION REFERENCE IS ICC |
| | (BVD), MARSHALL-SWIFT AND MEANS COST ANALYSIS SERVICES |
| | PER 108.3 FBC* |
| | |
| | 4)THE STATE OF FLORIDA REQUIRES COLLECTION OF A RADON |
| | SURCHARGE ON ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION COMPUTED ON UNDER |
| | ROOF FLOOR SPACE PER 10D-91 FAC. THESE FEES WILL BE |
| | ADDED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION FEES |
| | |
| | NOTE: FEES ARE DUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $311.63 FOR |
| | INCREASED VALUE AND STATE RADON FEES THIS AMOUNT IS |
| | REQUIRED TO BE PAID PRIOR TO FURTHER PLAN REVIEW |
| | |
| | 5)THE PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL INCLUDE TWO COPIES OF |
| | EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT IS RELEVANT PER 9B-72. THESE |
| | SHOULD INCLUDE THE FLORIDA STATE APPROVAL COVER PAGES. |
| | ALL CAN BE FOUND ON WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| | |
| | 6)THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE |
| | 9B-72 (PRODUCT APPROVALS) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND |
| | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO |
| | SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL PER 106.3.3 FBC* |
| | |
| | 7)THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH REQUIRES THE FLORIDA |
| | STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER |
| | SHEETS WHEN AVAILABLE. THEY CAN BE SEARCHED FOR ON |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG.WHEN AVAILABLE AND NOT |
| | SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS WILL BE DENIED. PLEASE SEE |
| | EXAMPLE ATTACHED FOR THE HORIZONTAL SLIDING GLASS |
| | WINDOWS |
| | |
| | 8)NO PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED FOR ROOFING |
| | SHINGLES, LINTELS,AND CONNECTORS AND STRAPS. PLEASE |
| | NOTE THE CONNECTORS MAY BE PROVIDED IN A SCHEDULE WITH |
| | THE UPLIFTS AND STATEWIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBERS |
| | INSTEAD OF PRODUCT APPROVALS. ALSO PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS |
| | SUBMITTED FOR SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS AND NONE ARE PRESENT |
| | ON DRAWINGS OR SCHEDULE. |
| | |
| | 9)SUBMIT ENGINEERED TRUSS DRAWINGS THAT COMPLY WITH |
| | R802.10.1 FBC WITH PERMIT APPLICATION OR BEFORE |
| | INSTALLATION THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY |
| | THE DESIGNER OF RECORD |
| | |
| | 10)SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF ENERGY CALC'S PER 13-101.2.2 |
| | FBC. BE SURE THAT THEY ARE SIGNED AND |
| | DATED BY PREPARER AND OWNER/AGENT PRIOR |
| | TO SUBMITTAL |
| | |
| | 11)PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ON THE |
| | DRAWINGS: |
| | |
| | A) PROVIDE SCHEDULE FOR PRE CAST LINTEL THAT WILL BE |
| | USED AND OPENING SIZES TO COMPLY WITH 2104.1.5 FBC |
| | |
| | B) DRAWINGS SHALL SHOW THE MINIMUM DEPTH OF FOUNDATION |
| | ON THE WALL SECTIONS PER R403.1.4 FBC RES. |
| | |
| | C) PROVIDE MIN ROOF SHEATHING ATTACHMENT PER R803.2.3.1 |
| | FBC RES. NOTE USE OF 8D RING SHANK |
| | |
| | D) PROVIDE BEAM ELEVATIONS,ROOF PITCH AND MEAN ROOF |
| | HEIGHT ON ELEVATIONS |
| | |
| | E) PROVIDE DIMENSIONS OF THE ADDITIONAT THE REAR ON |
| | THE FLOOR OR FOUNDATION PLAN |
| | |
| | F) NO DETAIL WAS PROVIDED FOR THE INFILL AREAS OF |
| | EXISTING WALLS |
| | |
| | G) PROVIDE ATTACHMENT METHOD FOR THE TRUSS LEDGER ON |
| | HIGH SIDE WALL |
| | |
| | H) DESIGN PRESSURES IN THE DOOR AND WINDOW SCHEDULE ARE |
| | ALL POSITIVE PSF"S |
| | |
| | 12)A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF |
| | COMMENCEMENT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO |
| | A PERMIT BEING ISSUED |
| | |
| | BLDG PLAN REVIEW |
| | ADRIAN MORSE |
| | 561-805-6716 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
