| Date |
Text |
| 2008-06-26 15:55:35 | MEETING HELD 6/26/08 |
| | IT BECAME APPARENT OF THE TWO ROLLS OF REVISED NEW SETS |
| | OF PLANS SUBMITTEDONLY ONE ROLL CONTAINED NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS. THE OTHER ROLL WAS NOT REVIEWED FOR CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE. |
| | THIS WAS AN ADMINISTRATIVE ERROR BY THE CONTRACTORS |
| | OFFICE. |
| | IN ATTENDANCE WAS MR. MICHAEL CARP, MR. KENNEDY AND MR. |
| | ROBERT FORMICA (ELECTRICAL ENGINEER OF RECORD). |
| 2008-05-23 13:02:28 | ** DENIED3RD REVIEW** |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | ARE NOT THE CORRECT VERSION PER FBC 13-400.3.B. THE |
| | RESPONSE MENTIONS THE WORDING ON THE STATE WEBSITE |
| | HOWEVER PLEASE READ WHAT IT SAYS. IT STATES THE *ENERGY |
| | GAUGE SUMMIT VERSIONS 3.0-3.14 WHICH IS IN *VERSION |
| | 2.5* IS ACCEPTABLE. THIS DOES NOT STATE A VERSION 3.0. |
| | IT IS STILL VERSION 2.5 WHICH INCORPORATES THE OTHER |
| | PROGRAMS. PLEASE READ THE STATEMENT AS IT CLEARLY |
| | STATES *IN VERSION 2.5*. THIS WAS EVEN ATTACHED TO |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED. I HAVE REDLINED AND |
| | CIRCLED THE LINE IN WHICH THE STATE HAS PARENTHESIS |
| | AROUND THE WORDING: * GENERATED BY FLA/COM 2004 |
| | COMPUTER PROGRAM, VERSION 2.5*. |
| | THIS REVIEWER HAS CALLED TWICE TO THE ENGINEER?S FIRM |
| | TO GO OVER THIS REQUIREMENT ON THIS AND OTHER PROJECTS. |
| | NO RETURN CALL HAS BEEN RECEIVED. |
| | PLEASE KNOW THIS WAS AND HAS BEEN CONFIRMED WITH THE |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION/DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY |
| | AFFAIRS ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS. |
| | PLEASE BE SURE OWNER AGENT IS FILLED OUT ON |
| | CERTIFICATION SHEET. |
| | |
| | *** PLEASE SEE SHEET E2.01 WHICH INDICATES INTERIOR |
| | LIGHTING POWER ALLOWANCE WHICH INDICATES *BUILDING |
| | METHOD A*. THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR A SHELL BUILDING. |
| | PLEASE SEE13-101.1.6. |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE SUBMITTED METHOD *B* DOES NOT |
| | COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM REQUIRED BY CODE. |
| | PLEASE SEE SOME OF THE FOLLOWING ARE GIVEN AS |
| | EXAMPLES. |
| | FOR EXAMPLE: |
| | PLEASE BE SURE TO INCLUDE ANY *ASSUMPTIONS* FOR FUTURE |
| | SHELL SPACE AT A MINIMUM. ONLY SHOWS 4 LIGHT FIXTURES |
| | AT 64WATTS. |
| | FOR EXAMPLE: |
| | PLEASE SEE SOME FIXTURES SHOWN WITH A *0* VALUE. HOW IS |
| | THIS POSSIBLE? |
| | FOR EXAMPLE: |
| | PLEASE SEE EXTERIOR LIGHTING ON THE INPUT DATA REPORT |
| | AS THESE STILL DO NOT MATCH/CORRELATE WITH THE PLANS. |
| | THE IDR SHOWS 2-50W FIXTURES AND 1-32 WATT FIXTURE. HOW |
| | IS THIS POSSIBLE WHEN THE PLANS CLEARLY SHOW SEVERAL |
| | OTHER FIXTURES WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN FIGURED OR PLACED |
| | INTO THE IDR. WHERE ARE THE *J* FIXTURES, THE *C* |
| | FIXTURES, THE *SA* FIXTURES????? |
| | FOR EXAMPLE: |
| | IN SPACE ON FIRST FLOOR WHICH IS SHOWN IN ZONE OTHER |
| | THAN SHELL ONLY FOUR (4) FIXTURES TOTAL ARE BEING SHOWN |
| | HOWEVER BASED ON THE FIRST FLOOR LIGHTING ELECTRICAL |
| | PLANS THERE ARE CLEARLY MORE FIXTURES. |
| | FOR EXAMPLE: |
| | PLEASE COORDINATE ALL FIXTURES AND DESIGNATIONS. ONE OF |
| | THESE WOULD BE *C* FIXTURE WHICH CLEARLY INDICATES THIS |
| | FIXTURE AS A *RESTROOM FIXTURE* ON THE FIXTURE LEGEND. |
| | |
| | **THESE ARE NOT THE ONLY LIGHTS ON PLANS WHICH STILL DO |
| | NOT COORDINATE WITH THE INPUT DATA REPORT AND ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS. |
| | THESE ARE ONLY A FEW EXAMPLES OF NON-COMPLIANCE.THIS |
| | IS NOT AN EXHAUSTED LIST. |
| | PLEASE SEE 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3. |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT *MINIMUM* LIFE SAFETY |
| | PHOTO-METRICS SHOWING AT LEAST THE MINIMUM COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE LIFE SAFETY CODE NFPA-101 7.8.1.3, 7.9.2.2 |
| | PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING LEVELS SUBMITTED FOR SOME AREAS |
| | ARE NOT CODE COMPLIANT AND PLEASE SEE SOME AREAS LIKE |
| | EXTERIOR REQUIRED EGRESS STAIRS STILL DO NOT SHOW ANY |
| | LEVELS AT ALL. |
| | PLEASE SEE PLANS AND COORDINATE. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE OTHER SHEETS IN SETS INCLUDING SITE |
| | LIGHTING ELECTRICAL NOW SHOW THE 2ND FLOOR EXTERIOR |
| | STAIRS OUT AND AWAY FROM THE BUILDING. THIS WILL AFFECT |
| | NOT ONLY THE REQUIRED PHOTO-METRICS HOWEVER ALSO THE |
| | LIGHTING ON ENERGY CALCULATIONS. |
| | PLEASE BE SURE TO COORDINATE ALL OF THESE SHEETS FOR |
| | LIFE SAFETY ETC. THIS IS A MINIMUM CODE. |
| | LS 101 7.8, 7.9, FBC CHAPTER 10, |
| | FBC ADMIN SECTIONS 106.1.2, FOR COORDINATION. |
| | FAC 61G15-33.004 |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COMPLIANCE FOR LIGHTING CONTROLS |
| | HAS NOT BEEN MET. PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.4 ALONE FOR |
| | EXTERIOR LIGHTING. NOTE #1 ON SHEET E2.01 FOR EXAMPLE |
| | WHICH STILL SHOWS EXTERIOR LIGHTING TO BE THROUGH |
| | LIGHTING CONTROL PANEL BUT NO DETAIL FOR ASTRONOMICAL |
| | TIME CLOCK OR PHOTO-SENSOR CONTROLS. |
| | RESPONSE MENTIONS THIS WAS REVISED HOWEVER BASED ON THE |
| | PLANS SUBMITTED THIS WAS NOT THE CASE. |
| | PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE THE OTHER LIGHTING AS NOTED ON |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW FOR INTERIOR LIGHTING ALSO. PLEASE SEE |
| | SEVERAL AREAS AS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW IN WHICH |
| | STANDARD SWITCHES ARE BEING SHOWN. 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, |
| | .1.2 AND .1.3. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTES WITH RESPECT TO |
| | FRAMING MEMBERS AND BONDING AS REQUIRED PER FBC 2704 |
| | RESPONSE MENTIONS THIS WAS ADDED TO E3.01 HOWEVER THIS |
| | IS NOT THE CASE. |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE RISER STILL ONLY SHOWS 3-MAINS WHEN |
| | IN FACT THERE ARE 4 MAINS. PLEASE LABEL ACCORDINGLY. |
| | PLEASE LABEL: 1OF4, 2OF 4 ETC |
| | 230.2E. |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW GAVE NOTICE TO FS |
| | 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO REPEAT COMMENT FOR CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE. THIS FEE AS REQUIRED BY STATUTORY |
| | REQUIREMENT HAS NOW BEEN ASSESSED. IT IS REQUIRED UNDER |
| | STATE STATUTE AND IS REQUIRED TO BE PAID BEFORE PLANS |
| | MAY BE RESUBMITTED FOR THE NEXT REVIEW. IT IS IMPORTANT |
| | TO KNOW ONE SET OF PLANS ARE RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE AT |
| | THIS TIME. IT IS ALSO IMPORTANT TO KNOW THAT IF THERE |
| | ARE ANY QUESTIONS, OR ANY PART OF THE REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | ARE NOT UNDERSTOOD IN ANY WAY, PLEASE CALL OR CONTACT |
| | THIS OFFICE. |
| | THIS REVIEW CALLED AND LEFT TWO MESSAGES IN RECENT |
| | WEEKS FOR RETURN CALLS TO BE MADE HOWEVER THIS TO DATE |
| | NO CALLS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED. |
| | THIS FEE UNDER STATUE IS DUE BEFORE RESUB. $9,000.00 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP |
| | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE |
| | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. |
| | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY |
| | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, |
| | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO |
| | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS |
| | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID |
| | ANY DELAYS. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
