| Date |
Text |
| 2008-01-04 09:46:49 | ** DENIED 2ND REVIEW ** |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE SOME COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE |
| | STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. |
| | |
| | ** COMMENTS BELOW ARE FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH A NOTE |
| | IN FRONT OF NOTE WHETHER OR NOT IT WAS ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE:NO, PLEASE SEE NO SPECIFIC CODES AS REQUIRED |
| | WERE STATED OR SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | *** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE *** |
| | PLEASE KNOW THAT ANY PERMIT APPLICATIONS WHICH ARE |
| | SUBMITTED AFTER DECEMBER 8TH, 2006 PLACES PROJECTS |
| | UNDER THE NEW CODES ADOPTED BY THE STATE. PLEASE SEE |
| | THAT THIS SHALL INCLUDE 2006 REVISIONS TO THE 2004 FBC |
| | FOR ALL TRADES AND THE 2005 NFPA-70. PLEASE KNOW THERE |
| | ARE CHANGES IN THE FBC WHICH MAY AFFECT DESIGNS FOR ALL |
| | TRADES. |
| | PLEASE LIST THE FOLLOWING ON ELECTRICAL SHEETS FOR THIS |
| | REVIEWER AT A MINIMUM. |
| | 2004 FBC W/ 2006 REVISIONS |
| | 2005 NFPA-70 |
| | 2002 NFPA-72(IF AN FA SYSTEM IS IN BUILDING) |
| | 2003 NFPA-101 |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: NO, VALUE FOR SCOPE OF WORK ON PLANS DID NOT |
| | CHANGE. VALUE STILL SHOWN AS $2500 AND A VALUE MAY BE |
| | ASSESSED USING THE ADOPTED GUIDES INTO THE FBC IF AN |
| | APPROPRIATE VALUE IS NOT ADJUSTED. |
| | |
| | **PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE *** |
| | PLEASE SEE THE VALUE AS SUBMITTED ON PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION BASED ON THE SCOPE OF WORK ON PLANS AND |
| | WHICH WILL BE REQUIRED IS EXTREMELY LOW. |
| | PLEASE SEE FBC 108.3 AS THE VALUE SHALL INCLUDE ALL |
| | LABOR, MATERIALS, COST OF |
| | DESIGN/ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES AND COST. |
| | THIS DOES NOT MATTER IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE OWNER |
| | SUPPLIED. |
| | PLEASE KNOW THE VALUE WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE ADJUSTED |
| | OR A VALUE MAY BE APPLIED BY THIS OFFICE USING THE |
| | MINIMUM STANDARDS ADOPTED INTO AND BY THE FLORIDA |
| | BUILDING CODE AND ADOPTED STANDARDS. |
| | ** THIS IS REQUIRED WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY |
| | ANY OTHER TRADE(S). |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 4) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 5) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 6) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE NO DEVICES ARE SHOWN FOR NEW TO |
| | BE INSTALLED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH FBC AND CHAPTER 13. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE *** |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT PLANS WITH COMPLIANCE FOR FBC CHAPTER 13 |
| | FOR LIGHTING CONTROLS. PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, |
| | .1.2. |
| | PLEASE INDICATE THE TYPE OF DEVICES OR SYSTEM WHICH |
| | WILL BE PROPOSED. |
| | PLEASE INCLUDE MAXIMUM TIMES ON ANY OVER RIDE DEVICES |
| | OR OCCUPANCY SENSOR DEVICES ETC. |
| | AS NO INFORMATION OR ITEMS WERE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW, A |
| | FULL REVIEW FOR CODE COMPLIANCE COULD NOT BE DONE AT |
| | THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | 7) NOTE:NO, PLEASE SEE NO LIGHTING PERFORMANCE |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR NEW AREAS WERE SUBMITTED. PLEASE SEE |
| | 13-415.2 OF THE FBC. FIXTURE LEGEND WAS SUBMITTED AS |
| | REQUESTED FROM PREVIOUS NOTE. |
| | |
| | *** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE *** |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT AND COMPLETE A FIXTURE LEGEND. PLEASE |
| | INCLUDE THE LIGHTING PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS PER |
| | 13-415.2. |
| | PLEASE KNOW IF SPACE IS NOW BEING AIR CONDITIONED, |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT ENERGY CALCULATIONS. |
| | 13-101, 13-103.1.1.1, 13-415.1.B, 13-415.1.C, 13-415.2 |
| | AS NO INFORMATION WAS SUBMITTED FOR MINIMUM CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE A REVIEW OF THESE ITEMS COULD NOT BE DONE. |
| | |
| | 8) NOTE: OK. |
| | |
| | 9) NOTE:NO, PLEASE SEE PLANS INDICATE THE UPPER |
| | MEZZANINE HOWEVER NO LEVELS FOR EGRESS LIGHTING WAS |
| | INDICATED FOR STAIRS, CORRIDOR. |
| | PLEASE SEE NFPA-101 7.8.1.3, 7.9.2.2 , 7.8, 7.9. FAC |
| | 61G15-33.004. |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLANS DO NOT INDICATE THE UPPER MEZZANINE LEVEL AS |
| | NOTED. |
| | PLANS DO NOT INDICATE ANY EMERGENCY LIGHTING FIXTURES |
| | NEEDED FOR MINIMUM EGRESS. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE STAIRS ALONE NEEDS LIGHTING LEVELS UNDER |
| | NORMAL AND EMERGENCY TO MEET THE LEVELS AS STATED IN |
| | THE LIFE SAFETY CODE 101, 7.8.1.3, AND 7.9.2.2. PLEASE |
| | SUBMIT THE PHOTO-METRIC LEVELS FOR STAIRS. PLEASE |
| | INDICATE THE EMERGENCY LIGHTING FIXTURES AT OTHER |
| | LOCATIONS TO MEET 1FT CANDLE MINIMUM. |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE NEC 700.12F FOR CIRCUITING OF |
| | THESE FIXTURES. |
| | |
| | 10) NOTE: NO, LOADSARE SHOWN ON PANEL SCHEDULE |
| | HOWEVER PLEASE INDICATE WHERE THE CONTINUOUS LOADS AT |
| | 125% ARE SHOWN?? |
| | |
| | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT THE LOAD CALCULATIONS WHICH INDICATE ALL |
| | CONTINUOUS LOADS AT 125%. |
| | 215.3, 230.42 ETC. |
| | |
| | * ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR |
| | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS |
| | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT |
| | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY |
| | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, |
| | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO |
| | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS |
| | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY |
| | DELAYS. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
