| Date |
Text |
| 2007-10-19 13:31:50 | RESIDENTIALADDITION BUILDING REVIEW SECOND |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | REVIEW DONE UNDER EXISTING BUILDING CODE 2004, |
| | RESIDENTIAL CODE 2004 AND FBC 2004 WITH 2007 |
| | REVISIONS. |
| | |
| | 1- VALUE DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO LOW. |
| | OWES $320.93 FOR UPDATED VALUATION AND RADON FEES. |
| | (REPEAT COMMENT). |
| | RESPONSE LETTER SAID FEES WERE PAID AND PAID RECEIPT IS |
| | ATTACHED.THIS WAS NOT DONE. |
| | |
| | 2- PROVIDE COMPLETE SECTION/DETAIL AND SPECIFICATIONS |
| | SHOWING REINFORCEMENT AND SHORING SPECIFICATIONS FOR |
| | DEMOLITION OF EXTERIOR BEARING WALL AT BEDROOM #3 AREA. |
| | (REPEAT COMMENT). SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC |
| | 2004. |
| | PLANS DON'T SHOW ANY DETAILS OR SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING |
| | HOW TO SHORE STRUCTURE TO AVOID COLLAPSE OF ROOF ABOVE |
| | WHEN WALL IS REMOVED. |
| | |
| | 3- PLANS TO SPECIFY ALL LIVE AND DEAD LOADS, INCLUDING |
| | THE ATTIC LIVE LOADS. ENGINEER TO REVIEWSEC. R301 AND |
| | TABLE R301.5 OF RESIDENTIAL CODE 2004 AND PROVIDE |
| | REQUIRED INFORMATION. (REPEAT COMMENT). INFORMATION |
| | SUBMITTED IS INCOMPLETE AND INCORRECT. IT CAN'T BE ONLY |
| | 10PSF ATTIC LIVE LOAD AND DEAD LOAD OF 30PSF. REVISE |
| | DESIGN INFORMATION AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 4- ENGINEER TO REVIEW ATTACHED COPY OF FLORIDA STATUTE |
| | 553.80(2)(B) REGARDING PLAN REVIEW FEES TO BE PAID BY |
| | ENGINEER WHEN DOCUMENTS ARE REJECTED SEVERAL TIMES. |
| | ***NOTE: ONE COPY OF PLANS WILL BE RETAINED IN THIS |
| | OFFICE TO BE SEND TOFLORIDA BOARD OF ENGINEERS FOR |
| | REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 5- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| | A) SEE PLUMBING COMMENTS REGARDING WATER HEATER. |
| | |
| | B) OWNER/AGENT TO SIGN AND DATE BOTTOM OF FORM. |
| | |
| | 6- SOIL TEST REPORT CALLS FOR 2000 PSF SOIL BEARING |
| | CAPACITY, WHILE STRUCTURAL NOTE #1 ONSHEET 2 REQUIRES |
| | 2500 PSF SOIL BEARING CAPACITY.ACCORDING TO THIS THE |
| | SOIL DOESN'T MEET THE ENGINEER'S DESIGN CRITERIA. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 7- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE |
| | 9B-72 FOR: |
| | A) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. NEED TO PROVIDEREPORT WITH |
| | LEGIBLE DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.1.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. (REPEAT COMMENT). |
| | |
| | B) ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON |
| | ALL PLANS. (REPEAT COMMENT). |
| | ONLY PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR ONE CONNECTOR WAS SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | ***NOTE: CLARIFY WHY SUBMITTING PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR |
| | STORM SHUTTERS IF WINDOWS PRODUCT APPROVALSUBMITTED |
| | HAVE MISSILE IMPACT GLASS. |
| | |
| | 8- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | (REPEAT COMMENT). |
| | ENGINEER CAN'T SIGN AND SEAL THESE PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT HIS DESIGN. |
| | PLEASE MAKE SURE NAME OF ENGINEER APPROVING PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS IS SHOWN ON THE REVIEW PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 9- REVISE ROOF SHEATHING NAILING SPACING. SEE SEC. |
| | R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.REPEAT |
| | COMMENT.NEED TO IDENTIFY ROOF ZONE 3 AND NAIL SPACING |
| | AS REQUIRED BY THE CITE SECTION ON THIS COMMENT. |
| | |
| | 10- PLEASE DON'T STAPLE PRODUCT APPROVALS TO THE |
| | DRAWINGS. THIS WILL EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | |
| | 11- TYPICAL WALL SECTION. REVISE CEILING INSULATION |
| | VALUE TO MATCH THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | ***NOTE:RE-SUBMITTAL FEES WILL APPLY FOR NEXT |
| | SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
