| Date |
Text |
| 2007-12-28 16:30:41 | RESIDENTIAL ADDITION, BUILDING REVIEW SECOND |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | REVIEW UNDER FBC 2004 WITH 2007 REVISIONS. |
| | |
| | 1-OWES $15.86 FOR NEW ADDITION RADON FEES. (REPEAT |
| | COMMENT). |
| | |
| | 2-NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. 713.13FLORIDA STATUTE.. |
| | |
| | 3-SHEET 1 OF 6: |
| | A)THIS BUILDING IS NOT CONSTRUCTION TYPE 3.SEE |
| | SEC.602.1 FBC 2004FOR CONSTRUCTION TYPES AND REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) SPECIFY ALL LOADS AS REQUIRED BY TABLE R301.5 OF |
| | 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. MISSING THESLEEPING |
| | AND NON SLEEPING ROOMS AND STAIRS UNIFORM DISTRIBUTED |
| | LIVE LOADS. PROVIDE ALL THE REQUIRED INFORMATION FROM |
| | TABLE R301.5. (REPEAT COMMENT). |
| | |
| | C) THIS IS NOT JUST AN ALTERATION TYPE II, BUT AN |
| | ADDITION AS WELL. SEE CHAPTER 9 OF 2004 FLORIDA |
| | EXISTING BUILDING CODE. AND REVISE INFORMATION AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 4- SOIL TEST REPORT SUBMITTED: |
| | A) ENGINEERING FIRM NEEDS TO SHOWTHE FIRM'S |
| | CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 61G15-23.002 OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. |
| | |
| | B) REVISE PROPOSED ADDITION SQUARE FOOTAGE.IT'S |
| | NOT 900 SF. SEE PLANS FOR CORRECT SQUARE FOOTAGE. |
| | |
| | 5- ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE TAKING THE CEILING FANS |
| | CREDIT. THEREFORE NEED TO SPECIFY CEILING FAN SIZES TO |
| | VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH TABLE 13-607.1.A.1 OF FBC 2004. |
| | (REPEAT COMMENT).SIZE OF CEILING PLANS SHOWN ON PLANS |
| | DON'T MEET THE MINIMUM SIZES SHOWN ON TABLE |
| | 13-607.1.A.1 OF FBC 2004. AND, ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE |
| | TAKEN FOR THE ENTIRE HOUSE. THEREFORE, NEED TO SPECIFY |
| | CEILING FAN SIZE ON EACH ROOM OF THE HOUSE. SEEABOVE |
| | TABLE FOR MIN.SIZE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 6-SHEET 3 OF 6:SIZE OF FOOTING SPECIFIED IN |
| | FOUNDATION PLAN DOESN'T MATCHSIZE SHOWN ON TYPICAL |
| | FOOTING ATTACHMENT. REVISE AS REQUIRED. (REPEAT |
| | COMMENT). |
| | |
| | 7-SHEET 4 OF 6:STAIRWAY BEARING WALL IS SHOWN |
| | INCORRECTLY ON 1ST FLOOR PLAN.PLAN SHOWS THE |
| | GUARDRAIL AND NOT THE WALL. (REPEAT COMMENT). REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 8- SHEET5 OF 6: |
| | A) REVISE RAILING HEIGHT SHOWN ON STAIRSECTION AND |
| | STAIR PLAN.SEE SEC. R311.5.6 OF 2004 FLORIDA |
| | RESIDENTIAL CODE. (REPEAT COMMENT). |
| | |
| | B) NUMBER OF RISERS SHOWN (14) ARE NOT ENOUGH. |
| | REVISENUMBER OF RISERS AS REQUIRED AND REVISE FLOOR |
| | PLANS AS REQUIRED ALSO. |
| | |
| | C) SPECIFY RISER HEIGHT IN INCHES.7.67" IS NOT A |
| | CORRECT DIMENSION. HOW DO YOU MEASURE IT?. PROVIDE |
| | CORRECT DIMENSION TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. |
| | R311.5.3 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | |
| | D) 9" TREAD REQUIRES MINIMUM 1" NOSING.2X10 TREADS |
| | AS SPECIFIED ON DETAILS DON'T PROVIDE THE 1" NOSING. |
| | SEE SEC. R311.5.3.3 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE |
| | AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. COORDINATE WITHITEM 8(B) AND |
| | 8(C) ABOVE. ALSO, PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR NOSING |
| | PROFILE TO COMPLY WITHTHIS CODE SECTION. |
| | |
| | 9- SHEET 6 OF 6: |
| | A) COORDINATEALLSTRUCTURALCONNECTORS SPECIFIED |
| | ON WALL SECTIONS AND DETAILS WITH THOSE SPECIFIED ON |
| | TRUSS ANCHOR SCHEDULE AND ROOF/FLOORFRAMING PLANS. |
| | (REPEAT COMMENT). |
| | |
| | B) WALL SECTION B-B:SIMPSON LSTA24 STRAP SPECIFIED |
| | TOTRANSFER LOAD TO THE EXISTING CONCRETE BLOCK WALL |
| | IS TOO SHORT.ALSO, NEED TO SPECIFYA WOOD TO MASONRY |
| | CONNECTOR. OTHERWISE PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAIL AND |
| | ENGINEERINGSHOWING HOW PROPOSED STRAP WILL BE NAILED |
| | TO RESIST THE CALCULATED LOADS.SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004 TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | CALCULATED LOADS OFSEC. R301 OF 2004 FLORIDA |
| | RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
