| Date |
Text |
| 2007-08-27 12:47:26 | RESIDENTIALADDITION AND RENOVATION BUILDING REVIEW |
| | FIRST CHECKLIST. |
| | REVIEW UNDER 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE ANDFBC |
| | 2004 WITH 2006/2007 REVISIONS. |
| | |
| | 1- OWES $15.86 FOR NEW ADDITION RADON FEES. |
| | |
| | 2- NEED RECORDEDNOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. 713.13 FLORIDASTATUTE. |
| | |
| | 3- PLANS NEED TO SPECIFY CONSTRUCTION TYPE AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. 602.1 FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 4- PROVIDE SOIL TEST REPORT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R401.4 |
| | OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | |
| | 5- PLANS TO SPECIFY ALL LOADS, INCLUDING THE ATTIC LIVE |
| | LOAD AS REQUIRED BY TABLE R301.5 OF 2004 FLORIDA |
| | RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | |
| | 6- EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS NEED TO SPECIFY ROOF PITCH. SEC. |
| | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 7- PROVIDE COMPLETE INTERIOR BEARING WALL SECTIONBY |
| | STAIRWAY OPENING THAT MATCHES PLANS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. INFORMATION SUBMITTED DOESN'T |
| | MATCH PLANS. |
| | |
| | 8- ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE TAKING THE CEILING FANS |
| | CREDIT. THEREFORE,NEED TO SPECIFY ON PLANS CEILING |
| | FAN SIZES TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH TABLE 13-607.1.A.1 |
| | OF FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 9- TRUSS PACKAGE: |
| | A) ARCHITECT CAN'T SIGN AND SEAL THE TRUSS PLAN. |
| | ARCHITECT IS REQUIRED TO REVIEW AND APPROVE TRUSS |
| | PACKAGE, NOT TO SIGN AND SEAL IT. |
| | |
| | B) TRUSS ENGINEER NEEDS TO ADHERE TO SEC. |
| | 61G15-23.002 OF FLORIDAADMINISTRATIVE CODEBY: |
| | * SIGNING AND SEALINGALL DRAWINGS WITH ORIGINAL |
| | SIGNATURE AND SEAL. |
| | ** PROVIDINGALL HIS INFORMATION IN ALL SHEETS. |
| | |
| | C) THIS IS A TWO STORY HOUSE.MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF |
| | 15'-0" SHOWN ON ENGINEERED TRUSSES IS INCORRECT. REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 10- SHEET 1 OF 6: |
| | A) SPECIFY TOTAL ROOF DEAD LOAD. LINE WAS LEFT |
| | BLANK. |
| | |
| | B) THIS IS NOT A LEVEL 2 ALTERATION. THIS IS AN |
| | ADDITION PLUS ALTERATION OF EXISTING HOUSE. SEE |
| | EXISTING BUILDING 2004 CODEFOR CORRECT SECTIONS TO BE |
| | REFERENCED AND REVISE INFORMATION AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 11- SHEET 3 OF 6: |
| | A) SPECIFY BUCK NAIL SIZE ON TYP. WINDOW AND SLIDING |
| | GLASS DOOR DETAIL. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC |
| | 2004. |
| | |
| | B) CLARIFY COLUMN SIZE SPECIFIED AT BOTHENDS OF |
| | DOOR LEADING TO THEUTILITY ROOM.DIMENSIONS SHOWN |
| | AND TYPE OF COLUMNS SHOWN DON'T MATCH. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | C) * SIZE OF FOOTING SPECIFIED IN FOUNDATION PLAN |
| | DOESN'T MATCHSIZE SHOWN ON TYPICAL FOOTING |
| | ATTACHMENT. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | ** ALSO,CLARIFY NUMBER OF #5 BARS TO BE USED. |
| | FOUNDATION PLAN INFORMATION AND DETAIL INFORMATION NEED |
| | TO MATCH. |
| | *** TYPICAL FOOTING ATTACHMENT DETAILS SHOWS 6" MIN. |
| | EMBEDMENT FOR #5 REBARS, WHILE SPECS ON SAME DETAIL |
| | CALL FOR 8". REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | D) SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN AND TRUSS LAYOUT DON'T |
| | MATCH. REVISE AS REQUIRED AND SPECIFY ALL STRUCTURAL |
| | CONNECTORS AS REQUIRED. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO |
| | FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | E) SPECIFY DEPTH OF FLOOR TRUSSES. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 12- SHEET 4 OF 6: |
| | A) STAIRWAY BEARING WALL IS SHOWN INCORRECTLY. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) CLARIFY IF WINDOW ON EXISTING BATHROOM WILL BE |
| | BLOCKED OR NOT. PLANSHOWS UNBLOCKED WINDOW. |
| | |
| | 13- SHEET 5 OF 6: |
| | A) ROOF FRAMING PLAN AT ENTRY PORCH DOESN'T MATCH |
| | TRUSS LAYOUT.REVISE AS REQUIRED AND SPECIFY CORRECT |
| | TRUSS CONNECTOR ACCORDING TO THE STRUCTURE ATTACHMENT, |
| | CONCRETE BEAM OR WOOD BEAM. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | B) CONNECTORS MTS 16 AND MTSM 16 DON'T PROVIDE |
| | LATERAL SUPPORT. CLARIFY WHERE ARE THE LATERAL LOADS |
| | FOR MTSM CONNECTOR TAKEN FROM.SPECIFY CONNECTORS THAT |
| | PROVIDE LATERAL SUPPORT OR PROVIDE COMPLETE ENGINEERING |
| | ANALYSIS SHOWING HOW SPECIFIEDCONNECTORS WILL RESIST |
| | THE LATERAL LOADS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC |
| | 2004. |
| | |
| | C) SPECIFY HOW IS THE GUARDRAIL ATTACHED TO COMPLY |
| | WITH SEC. 1607.7.1 FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | D) REVISE RAILING HEIGHT SHOWN ON STEP RAILING |
| | DETAIL. SEE SEC R311.5.6 FBC 2004 AND STAIR SECTION |
| | DETAIL AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | E) INFORMATION ON STAIR TREAD DETAIL AND STAIR |
| | SECTION TO MATCH. REVISE NUMBER OF STRINGERS, AND RISER |
| | HEIGHT. |
| | |
| | F)THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT SIZE OF FLOOR TRUSSES |
| | SPECIFIED ON STAIR SECTION DETAIL. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | G) STAIR PLAN DOESN'T MATCH FLOOR PLAN. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEE LOCATION OF INTERIOR BEARING WALL.. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | H) FLOOR SHEATHING SPECS SHOWN ON STAIR SECTION |
| | DON'T MATCH SPECS SHOWN ON TYPICAL WALL SECTION. REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | I) STAIR HANDRAIL DETAIL DOESN'T MATCH STAIR |
| | SECTION. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 13- SHEET 6 OF 6: |
| | A) REVISE ROOF SHEATHINGNAIL TYPE AND SPACING |
| | SPECS, INCLUDING ROOF ZONE 3 IN ALL WALL SECTIONS.SEE |
| | SEC. R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIALAND REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) REVISE FOOTING SIZE IN ALL WALL SECTIONS TO MATCH |
| | FOUNDATION PLAN. |
| | |
| | C) REVISE SECOND FLOOR SHEATHINGSPECS TO MATCH IN |
| | ALL WALL SECTIONS AND STAIR SECTION DETAIL. |
| | |
| | D) REVISE ALL TRUSS CONNECTORS.COORDINATE WITH |
| | ITEM 13(B) ABOVE. |
| | |
| | E) PROVIDE COMPLETE STUD SIZE ON SECOND FLOOR WALL |
| | FRAMING SPECS ON WALL SECTION B-B.SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | F) INTERIOR BEARING WALL DETAIL: WALL IS SUPPORTING |
| | THE SECOND FLOOR TRUSSES, NOT THE ROOF JOIST. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | G) SPECIFICATIONS ON ENTRY PORCH SECTIONS ARE NOT |
| | LEGIBLE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SAME THING APPLIES TO WALL |
| | SECTION C-C. |
| | |
| | H) WALL SECTION C-C: |
| | * REVISE TO MATCH TRUSSSECOND FLOOR LAYOUTAND |
| | SPECIFY ALL CONNECTORS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO |
| | FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 14- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE |
| | 9B-72 FOR: |
| | A) FLAT ROOF SYSTEM. CLEARLY SPECIFY FASTENING |
| | OPTION TO BE USED FROM PAGE 28 OF NOA 03-0501.02 |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | AND, PROVIDE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR NAIL ENHANCING AT |
| | PERIMETER AND CORNER AREAS AS REQUIRED BY GENERAL |
| | LIMITATION #7. |
| | |
| | B) SIMPSON OR USP STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON |
| | PLANS. SUBMIT ONLY THEFLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | COVER PAGE AND PAGE SHOWING THE CONNECTOR TO SAVE |
| | PAPER. |
| | |
| | C) 8" PRECAST LINTELS. NOA SUBMITTED IS FOR 4", 6' & |
| | 12" PRECAST LINTELS, NOT 8" PRECAST LINTELS. |
| | |
| | 15- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
