| Date |
Text |
| 2008-02-14 15:56:27 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 07080080 |
| | ADD: 301 LAMBERTON DR. |
| | CONT: THE WEITZ CO. |
| | TEL: (561)719-0102 |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | REVIEW: 2ND 2-14-08 |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- |
| | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & |
| | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL |
| | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH |
| | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE |
| | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE |
| | FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR |
| | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | **NOTED** |
| | 2) FL S S 713.13 NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED |
| | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT.NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE |
| | WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS NOT |
| | ACTUALLY COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING |
| | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) |
| | THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. |
| | |
| | **2ND REVIEW.** |
| | 3)1802.2.1 QUESTIONABLE SOIL. WHERE THE |
| | SAFE-SUSTAINING POWER OF THE SOIL IS IN DOUBT, OR WHERE |
| | A LOAD-BEARING VALUE SUPERIOR TO THAT SPECIFIED IN THIS |
| | CODE IS CLAIMED, THE BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL REQUIRE |
| | THAT THE NECESSARY INVESTIGATION BE MADE. SUCH |
| | INVESTIGATION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF |
| | SECTIONS 1802.4 THROUGH 1802.6. THIS IS A QUESTIONABLE |
| | SOIL AREA SO PLEASE PROVIDE THE SOIL REPORT. |
| | |
| | 4) 2ND REVIEW **NOTED** |
| | HOWEVER, THE USE AND OCCUPANCY, INDICATED ON THE |
| | DRAWINGS (A-3) DOES NOT CORRESPOND WITH THE MAIN |
| | STRUCTURE. |
| | |
| | **2ND REVIEW.** |
| | 5)SHEET S1.2 THE INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT WAS |
| | CHANGED TO 0.55 FOR PARTIALLY ENCLOSED BUILDINGS, |
| | HOWEVER THE DESIGN CRITERIA ON S1.2 REFERS TO THE |
| | BUILDING AS AN ENCLOSED BUILDING. AS STATED IN THE |
| | FIRST REVIEW, THERE ARE SCREENS INDICATED ON EACH |
| | ELEVATION OF THE BUILDING. WITHOUT THE INSTALLATIONS OF |
| | WINDOWS, THE SCREENS WILL ALLOW THE PRESSURES TO BUILD |
| | IN THE BUILDING DURING HURRICANES /TORNADO OR OTHER |
| | NATURAL DISASTERS. |
| | |
| | 6)OK |
| | 7)OK |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW **NOTED** |
| | 8)THE STRUCTURAL SHEETS DO NOT PROVIDE UPLIFT FORCES |
| | TO BE RESISTED OR THE TYPE OF HARDWARE TO BE USED TO |
| | RESIST UPLIFT AND LATERAL LOADS. PROVIDE A BEAM AND |
| | COLUMN SCHEDULE INDICATING THE SIZE OF EACH COLUMN AND |
| | BEAM. WHAT IS THE SIZE OF L-1 / L-2 AND L-3? |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW |
| | 9)FBC 1609.1.4 COMPONENTS & CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 |
| | COPIES (3 IF THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF |
| | PRODUCTS TESTING REPORTS, MISSING REPORTS ARE AS |
| | FOLLOWS |
| | A] TRUSS ANCHORS OK |
| | B] WALL LOUVERS |
| | C} PANEL WALL SYSTEMS-SCREEN (NOTE: DELETED FROM |
| | PLANS) |
| | D] TECO POST ANCHORS AND TECO POST CAPS. |
| | |
| | 10)OK |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW. |
| | 11)WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE |
| | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND |
| | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO |
| | SUBMITTAL FORJURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL.**ALL SETS OF |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL SHALL BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD. ONLY ONE SET HAS THE APPROVAL OF |
| | THE DESIGNER.** |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW |
| | 12)THE ROOF IS MISSING OR NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | FOLLOWING ITEMS. |
| | ____1)CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING |
| | INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION, SEE ATTACHED POLICY: |
| | MEAN ROOF HEIGHT/ ROOF PITCH / ROOF DECK TYPE / AREA OF |
| | EACH ROOF TYPE |
| | ____ 2) FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | REQUIRED IN ADDITION TO THE EVALUATION REPORT |
| | SUBMITTED, FAC9B72.WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| | _XX_ 3) FOR THE FLAT DECK, SELECT THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY |
| | YOU ARE USING.ALSO INDICATE WHICH FASTENER IF THE |
| | OPTIONS HAVE DIFFERENT PRESSURE LIMITATIONS. |
| | _XX_4)FOR THE FLAT DECK, SPECIFY THE ENHANCED |
| | FASTENING FOR CORNER AND PERIMETER ZONES. |
| | _XX_5)SEE PRODUCT LIMITATION #7.CALCULATIONS |
| | PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, OR REGISTERED ROOF |
| | CONSULTANT REQUIRED FOR ENHANCED FASTENING. |
| | XX6) THE SYSTEM PROVIDED INDICATES LIMITATION #9, NO |
| | ENHANCED FASTENING IS ALLOWED. |
| | |
| | 13)OK |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW |
| | 14)BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, |
| | IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE |
| | ACTUAL PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT |
| | OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE |
| | PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 15)OK |
| | 16)OK |
| | |
| | MYRON JACOBS |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEWER |
| | (561)805-6726 |
| | (561) 805-6676 |
| | [email protected] |
