| Date |
Text |
| 2007-11-05 16:45:00 | ** DENIED 2ND REVIEW ** |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE SEE SOME ITEMS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE STILL |
| | IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE THERE ARE NEW COMMENTS DUE TO CHANGES |
| | MADE ON PLANS AND INFORMATION NOW SUBMITTED WHICH WAS |
| | NOT ON PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED PLANS. |
| | |
| | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PLANS ARE NOW SIGNED, DATED AND |
| | SEALED BY AN ENGINEER HOWEVER THE PLANS DO NOT INDICATE |
| | ANY TITLE BLOCKS AS REQUIRED PER FAC 61G15-23.002, FS |
| | 471.023 |
| | |
| | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE RISER NOW CONTAINS NOTES FOR |
| | THE EXISTING SERVICE WITH SOME ITEMS BEING NEW OR |
| | NEEDING TO MEET MINIMUM CODE FOR SAFETY. |
| | PLEASE SEE SOME ITEMS ARE NOT POSSIBLE AS SHOWN. PLEASE |
| | SEE THE BELOW FOR SOME EXAMPLES. |
| | RISER CONTAINS A NOTE #2 FOR CONDUCTORS FROM GUTTER TO |
| | MAIN DISCONNECT WHICH READS THE CONDUCTORS MUST BE |
| | SIZED FOR 400AMPS. HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE WHEN THE MAIN |
| | IS 600AMP RATED? |
| | RISER ALSO CONTAINS A NOTE #1 AS LISTED ON NOTES ON |
| | UPPER LEFT HAND CORNER OF PLANS WHICH STATES CONDUCTORS |
| | ARE TO BE RATED FOR 200AMPS. HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE WHEN |
| | THIS SAME MAIN IS 600AMPS AND THE CONDUCTORS ON HDP FOR |
| | FEEDERS IS THAT OF TWO SETS OF 350MCM. |
| | PLEASE ALSO SEE NOTE #1 FOR CONDUCTORS FROM TRANSFORMER |
| | TO LDP WHICH STATES CONDUCTORS ARE TO BE RATED FOR |
| | 200AMPS! HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE WHEN THE MINIMUM RATING |
| | OF CONDUCTORS SHALL BE 400AMPS? THE RESPONSE MENTIONS |
| | THAT TWO CONDUITS ARE PRESENT AND IT IS BEING ASSUMED |
| | THAT THESE CONTAIN 3/0S. THE LDP PANEL STATES THE |
| | FEEDERS ARE 500 MCM. IN EITHER CASE THE CONDUCTORS |
| | WHICH ARE SHOWN ARE NOT RATED PER 310.16, 240.21. |
| | ** PLEASE CORRELATE NOTES AS THE AMPERAGES DO NOT |
| | CORRELATE WITH THE MINIMUM SIZES FOR LIFE SAFETY AND |
| | FIRE HAZARD. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| | REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | ** IMPORTANT** |
| | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR |
| | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS |
| | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT |
| | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS |
| | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. |
| | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY |
| | DELAYS. |
| | |
| | DEWEY PALMER |
| | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II |
| | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | 561-805-6717 |
| | [email protected] |
