| Date |
Text |
| 2007-08-01 07:17:55 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 07071062 |
| | ADD: 1501 AUSTRALIAN AVE |
| | CONT: WEST CONST. INC. |
| | TEL: (561)588-2027 |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | REVIEW: 1ST |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- |
| | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & |
| | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL |
| | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH |
| | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE |
| | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE |
| | FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR |
| | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | 2)ROOF REQUIREMENTS |
| | |
| | ____1.)A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE FILED |
| | WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS PRIOR TO PERMIT PICKUP, |
| | FS713.13. |
| | |
| | _XX___2.)CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING |
| | INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION, SEE ATTACHED |
| | POLICY:MEAN ROOF HEIGHT/ ROOF PITCH / ROOF DECK TYPE / |
| | AREA OF EACH ROOF TYPE |
| | |
| | _XX__3.)FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | REQUIRED IN ADDITION TO THE EVALUATION REPORT |
| | SUBMITTED, FAC9B72.WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| | |
| | _XX___4.)FOR THE FLAT DECK, SELECT THE APPROVED |
| | ASSEMBLY YOU ARE USING.ALSO INDICATE WHICH FASTENER |
| | IF THE OPTIONS HAVE DIFFERENT PRESSURE LIMITATIONS. |
| | |
| | _XX__5.)FOR THE FLAT DECK, SPECIFY THE ENHANCED |
| | FASTENING FOR CORNER AND PERIMETER ZONES. |
| | |
| | ____ 6.)ON THE TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL, INDICATE WHICH |
| | METHOD OF ATTACHMENT YOU ARE USING. |
| | |
| | _XX___ 7.)SEE PRODUCT LIMITATION #7.CALCULATIONS |
| | PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, OR REGISTERED ROOF |
| | CONSULTANT REQUIRED FOR ENHANCED FASTENING. |
| | |
| | 3)FBC 1609.6.2.2THE SYSTEM SELECTED |
| | FROM THE SUBMITTED FLAT ROOF PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL NOA HAS A MAXIMUM DESIGN |
| | PRESSURE OF LESS THAN -89 PSF AND CITES |
| | GENERAL LIMITATION #9 (SEE PAGE 36_ OF |
| | 43_).GENERAL LIMITATION #9 PROHIBITS |
| | RATIONAL ANALYSIS OR EXTRAPOLATION TO |
| | ENHANCE THE UPLIFT PRESSURE AT PERIMETER |
| | AND CORNER AREAS BY REDUCING THE |
| | FASTENER SPACING IN THESE AREAS.EITHER |
| | SELECT AN ALTERNATIVE SYSTEM (OR PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL) THAT DOES NOT CITE GENERAL |
| | LIMITATION #9.ALTERNATIVELY IF THE |
| | SELECTED SYSTEM DOES CITE GENERAL |
| | LIMITATION #9, IT MUST HAVE A MAXIMUM |
| | DESIGN PRESSURE THAT EXCEEDS THE |
| | PRESSURE IN ROOF ZONE 3 (TYPICALLY -89 |
| | PSF FOR MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF 30 FEET OR |
| | LESS). |
| | |
| | MYRON JACOBS |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEWER |
| | 805-6726 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
