| Date |
Text |
| 2008-09-10 08:53:21 | REVIEW #: 2ND FOR REVISION 3 |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS |
| | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AS WELL AS DESIGNER'S WRITTEN |
| | RESPONSES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUITY. |
| | |
| | 1. THE FOLLOWING ISSUES RELATED TO RATED WALLS AND DUCT |
| | PENETRATIONS ARE STILL OUTSTANDING: |
| | |
| | A) PAGE M-1A IS STILL MISSING AT LEAST ONE FIRE DAMPER |
| | AT THE 12X12 DUCT PENETRATION OF THE WALL BETWEEN ROOM |
| | #7 AND ROOM #138. THERE IS STILL A FIRE DAMPER SHOWN ON |
| | THE PLANS IN THE 6 INCH ROUND DUCT AT THE NON-RATED |
| | WALL BETWEEN ROOM #130 AND THE MAIN LOBBY. |
| | PAGE M-1B IS STILL MISSING ONE FIRE DAMPER IN THE 24X12 |
| | DUCT PENETRATION OF THE WALL BETWEEN ROOM #7 AND ROOM |
| | #138. |
| | |
| | B) OK |
| | |
| | C) PAGE M-2: FIRE/SMOKE DAMPERS HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM |
| | PLANS. HOWEVER, THE PLANS DO NOT SHOW PROVISIONS FOR |
| | FAN SHUT-DOWN BY DUCT SMOKE DETECTOR AS REQUIRED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 606.2. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THIS |
| | SECTION. |
| | |
| | 2 AND 3: OK |
| | |
| | 4. PAGE M-3: ONE OF THE TWO ROOF CURB DETAILS WHICH |
| | WERE PASTED ONTO THIS PAGE IS SMALL AND ILLEGIBLE. |
| | ALSO, BOTH OF THE CURB DETAILS ARE IN CONFLICT WITH THE |
| | STRUCTURAL DETAILS FOR ROOF CURB INSTALLATION. SEE PAGE |
| | SD-3. ALSO, THE RTU TIE-DOWN DETAIL SHOWS CABLES |
| | ATTACHING TO SOME SORT OF CONCRETE EMBEDDED ANCHORING |
| | SYSTEM INSTALLED IN A CONCRETE SLAB. HOW IS THIS |
| | INSTALLATION POSSIBLE ON A ROOF WHICH CONSISTS OF A |
| | BUILT-UP ROOF SYSTEM ON A STEEL DECK OVER BAR JOISTS? |
| | THIS IS THE TYPE OF ROOFING SYSTEM SHOWN ON STRUCTURAL |
| | PLANS. CLARIFY AND COORDINATE STRUCTURAL AND MECHANICAL |
| | DRAWINGS. ADDITIONALLY, STILL NO INFORMATION WAS |
| | PROVIDED FROM THE RTU OR EXHAUST FAN MANUFACTURERS |
| | SHOWING THEIR APPLIANCES ARE DESIGNED TO RESIST WIND |
| | PRESSURES. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, APPLIANCES AND |
| | SUPPORTS THAT ARE EXPOSED TO WIND SHALL BE DESIGNED AND |
| | INSTALLED TO RESIST THE WIND PRESSURES ON THE EQUIPMENT |
| | AND THE SUPPORTS AS DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM |
| | 301.13. |
| | |
| | 5 AND 6: OK |
| | |
| | 7. COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS IN THE FORM OF A SYSTEM |
| | SIZING SUMMARY HAVE BEEN PROVIDED AS REQUESTED. |
| | HOWEVER, ALSO SUBMITTED WAS 3 COPIES OF ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR WHAT APPEARS TO BE ANOTHER PROJECT |
| | LOCATED IN ANOTHER JURISDICTION. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF |
| | INCLUDING THESE CALCULATIONS WITH THIS SUBMITTAL? |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | NOTE: A COMPLETE ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE FORM IS NOT |
| | REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT. ONLY COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | BASIC PRESCRIPTIVE REQUIREMENTS IS NECESSARY IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 13-101.6. |
| | |
| | NOTE: PLEASE RESPOND TO EACH COMMENT IN WRITING WITH A |
| | DESCRIPTION OF HOW EACH COMMENT HAS BEEN ADDRESSED AS |
| | WELL AS WHERE THE INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND. REMOVE |
| | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS FROM THE SUBMITTED PLANS AND PROVIDE |
| | ONE SET OF OLD VOIDED/SHEETS FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: |
| | RONALD J. REGUEIRO |
| | 561.805.6719 |
| | [email protected] |
