Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 07071001
Permit Number 07071001
Review Stop E
Sequence Number 3
Notes
Date Text
2008-02-01 14:42:01** DENIED 3RD REVIEW **
  
 ** PLEASE SEE SOME COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS ARE
 STILL IN NEED OF CORRECTIONS. PLEASE ALSO SEE THERE ARE
 NEW COMMENT(S) BASED ON INFORMATION NOW PLACED ON PLANS
 WHICH WAS NOT SHOWN PREVIOUSLY.
  
 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE #1 WHICH SPECIFICALLY
 REQUESTED THE FOLLOWING CODES TO BE PLACED ON
 ELECTRICAL PLANS>
 THIS IS REQUIRED.
 2004 FBC W/2007 REVISIONS.
 2005 NFPA-70
 2003 NFPA-101
  
 ** MAY NOT QUOTE *LATEST EDITION*
  
 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEWS WHICH REQUESTED
 NORMAL AND EMERGENCY PHOTO-METRIC LEVELS FOR STAIRS.
 THE LEVELS SUBMITTED AND SHOWN ON ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
 DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM LEVELS AS SET-FORTH IN THE LIFE
 SAFETY CODE. PLEASE ALSO SEE ONLY ONE LEVEL WAS
 SUBMITTED.
 THIS WAS IN BOTH PREVIOUS REVIEWS.
 PLEASE SEE 7.8.1.3, 7.9.2.2
  
 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEWS REQUESTED TO
 COMPLETE WIRING FOR ALL OUTSIDE AND LANDSCAPE LIGHTING.
 NO SITE ELECTRICAL PLANS COULD BE LOCATED.
 PLEASE ALSO SEE SOME OUTSIDE LIGHTING IS NOW SHOWN ON A
 SINGLE POLE LIGHT SWITCH WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. PLEASE
 SEE FBC CHAPTER 13, 13-415.1.ABC.1.4, 13-415.1.ABC.2
 WHICH SPECIFICALLY REQUIRES AUTOMATED CONTROLS FOR
 OUTSIDE LIGHTING LEVELS.
 FOR EXAMPLE: OUTSIDE LIGHTS MAY NOT BE TURNED ON BE A
 SINGLE POLE SWITCH WHICH WILL LEAVE LIGHTS ON DURING
 DAYLIGHT HOURS AND CONDITIONS. THIS COMMENT IS FOR ALL
 LIGHTS OUTSIDE INCLUSIVE OF LANDSCAPE, PARKING, WALL
 LIGHTS, SIGN ETC.
 ** PLEASE SEE THERE IS STILL NOT ENOUGH
 PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTES WITH RESPECT TO LIGHTING
 PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS WHICH ARE NOT COMPLETE. THE
 FIRST REVIEW SUBMITTED METHOD *A* WHICH COULD NOT BE
 USED BASED ON THIS WAS NOT NEW CONSTRUCTION AND DID
 MEET THE DEFINITIONS OF RENOVATIONS. WHEN THIS IS THE
 CASE METHOD *B* OR *C* IS REQUIRED. PLEASE SEE THE
 PERMIT APPLICATION PACKAGE OF PLANS AND SUPPORTING
 DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED DID NOT CONTAIN ANY FLA-COM FORMS.
 THE LIGHTING LEVELS SHOWN ON SHEET E-1 DOES NOT CONTAIN
 THE INFORMATION FOR PERFORMANCE LEVELS AS NEEDED AND
 REQUIRED FOR MINIMUM COMPLIANCE WITH FBC 13-415.2,
 13-415.1.B, 13-415.1.C, 13-400.0.C, 13-400.0.B,
 13-400.3.B, 13-400.3.C, ETC
 PLEASE SEE NO EXTERIOR ALLOWANCES WERE SHOWN, PLEASE
 SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1.3
  
 ***ATTENTION, PLEASE SEE FAC 61G15-33.004 WHICH
 REQUIRES THE ENGINEER OF RECORD TO DESIGN MINIMUM
 COMPLIANCE FOR ALL LIGHTING REQUIRED IN THE NEC< LS 101
 AND FBC.
  
 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW WHICH STATED THAT
 NEW *EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTORS* WERE ADDED BEFORE
 THE FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT(S) WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED
 BY THE NEC. PLEASE SEE CODE SECTIONS 250.6, 250.24.
 PLEASE KNOW THE *EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTORS* ARE
 ONLY INSTALLED *AFTER* THE FIRST MEANS OF DISCONNECT.
 AS SHOWN THIS WOULD CREATE OBJECTIONABLE CURRENTS AND A
 UNSAFE INSTALLATION. PLEASE REMOVE.
  
 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE COMPLETE GROUNDING ELECTRODE
 SYSTEM HAS NOW BEEN MOVED AND IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH
 ANY SECTION OF NEC 250.
 PLEASE MOVE THIS GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM TO MEET
 NEC.
 PLEASE SEE REDLINED PLANS.THIS GEC AND SYSTEM SHALL
 BEAS FOLLOWS::
 1/0, 250.66,
 2-GROUND RODS, 250.50, 250.56
 COLD WATER PIPE, 250.50
 GAS *** BOND ONLY***, 250.104
 ** BUILDING STRUCTURAL FOOTER STEEL IS ONLY REQUIRED
 WHERE 20FT OR MORE IS AVAILABLE. PLEASE KNOW AS THIS IS
 AN EXISTING BUILDING AND IT DOES NOT APPEAR NEW FOOTERS
 OF 20FT OR MORE ARE NOT BEING INSTALLED, AN ATTACHMENT
 TO THE EXISTING IS NOT REQUIRED PER 250.50. IF THIS IS
 SHOWN ON THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE RISER THEN IT WILL BE
 REQUIRED.
 EXPOSING OLD/EXISTING FOOTER WOULD BE DETRIMENTAL TO
 THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE EXISTING FOOTERS.
  
 ** IMPORTANT** PLEASE CALL TO GO OVER THIS AS THERE IS
 SOME LOSS IN UNDERSTANDING FROM THE COMMENTS TO WHAT IS
 BEING DONE ON PLANS. THIS IS FOR COMMENT #4 AND 5.
  
 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE A NEW NOTE WAS ADDED TO E-2 HOWEVER
 WAS NOT PER THE PREVIOUS NOTES OF 13-413.1.ABC.2.1 AND
 .2.2.
  
 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO
 REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.
 PLEASE SEE THAT A FEE OF $3, 408 IS DUE BEFORE
 RE-SUBMITTAL OF PLANS. THIS IS NOT ASSESSED TO THE
 CONTRACTOR OR OWNER.
 ONE SET OF PLANS WILL BE RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE.
  
 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FS 713.13(2), THE NOTICE OF
 COMMENCEMENT SUBMITTED IS EXPIRED.
 WHEN WORK HAS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 90DAYS OF RECORDING
 NOC, THE NOC BECOMES VOID AND WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE
 RE-RECORDED.
  
 ** PLEASE BE SURE TO ADDRESS COMMENTS. IF THERE ARE ANY
 QUESTIONS, ANY COMMENTS NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR OR
 NOT UNDERSTOOD IN ANYWAY PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE IN
 CONTACTING THIS REVIEWER.
  
 * ** IMPORTANT**
 ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR
 CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL
 OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS
 INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT
 LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS.
 PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY
 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS,
 SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO
 TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC.
 PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS
 SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE.
 THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY
 DELAYS.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
  
  
  
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved