| Date |
Text |
| 2007-12-04 15:31:15 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC* |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | |
| | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FSFLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS LIST |
| | |
| | 1.INDICATE LEVEL OF ALTERATION, FBC EB301.5. |
| | |
| | PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER 3.THE ARCHITECT HAS DECLARED |
| | LEVEL 2 AND HAS PROVIDED INFORMATION REGARDING |
| | VALUATION.SEE FBC EB 202, DEFINITIONS, REPAIR.THIS |
| | IS NOT A REPAIR FOR BUILDING CODE PURPOSES.SEE FBC EB |
| | 305, WORK AREA APPEARS TO BE OVER 50% OF THE BUILDING. |
| | THE INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDING VALUATION DOES NOT |
| | AFFECT THE LEVEL OF ALTERATION DETERMINATION.PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY CORRECT LEVEL OF ALTERATION AS CODE COMPLIANCE |
| | AND REQUIREMENTS CANNOT BE DETERMINED BASED ON THE |
| | INFORMATION PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 2.ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 3.THE ARCHITECT STATES THAT THIS IS MERCANTILE CLASS |
| | B IN HIS LETTER AND AT TOP LEFT OF SHEET A1, AND |
| | DECLARES THIS AS MERCANTILE GROUP M ON A1, BUILDING |
| | DATA.PLEASE SEE FBC302.1, PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS TO BE |
| | CLASSIFIED ACCORDING TO FBC 302.3.IT APPEARS THAT |
| | THIS SPACE IS MIXED USE AS THE OFFICE AREA DOES NOT |
| | COMPLY WITH THE DEFINITION OF ACCESSORY USE, FBC302.2. |
| | |
| | ARCHITECT IS DECLARING THIS AS MERCANTILE B, BUT B IS |
| | BUSINESS, MERCANTILE IS M.PLEASE CLASSIFY EACH |
| | PORTION OF THE BUILDING.WHAT WAS THE PREVIOUS |
| | OCCUPANCY OF THIS SPACE? |
| | |
| | CONTRACTOR HAS INDICATED THAT THIS IS A CHANGE OF |
| | OCCUPANCY.IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, REVISE THE |
| | APPLICATION.IF THIS IS A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY, INCLUDE |
| | IN THE BUILDING DATA INFORMATION ON A1. |
| | |
| | 4-6. ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 7.I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE THE SPIRAL STAIR SHOPS. |
| | PLEASE HAVE THE ARCHITECT INCORPORATE DESIGN INTO THE |
| | PLAN, FBC1009.9. |
| | |
| | 8.SHOPS FOR ROOF FRAMING WERE NOT SUBMITTED AS |
| | STATED.THIS CAN BE REVIEWED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. |
| | |
| | 9-13. ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 14.ARCHITECT STATES IN HIS RESPONSE LETTER (AND ON |
| | A1) THAT OCCUPANT LOAD IS LESS THAN 3 FOR THE SECOND |
| | FLOOR.SEE FBC1004.1, OCCUPANT LOAD CANNOT BE LESS |
| | THAN FBC TABLE 1004.SEE OTHER COMMENTS REGARDING |
| | OCCUPANT LOAD. |
| | |
| | 15-22. ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 23.PLEASE REVISE OCCUPANCY AND OCCUPANT LOAD FOR |
| | SECOND FLOOR AS DISCUSSED WITH ARCHITECT. |
| | |
| | 24.PLAN A1 SHOWS A SITE WALL TO BE DEMOLISHED, BUT IT |
| | APPEARS THAT THE STAIR RAIL IS ON THIS WALL.FBC EB |
| | 501.2. |
| | |
| | 25.2MP1, CONCRETE PADS ARE SHOWN ON THE ROOF.THIS |
| | CONFLICTS WITH THE DETAIL ON S3.PLEASE CORRELATE AND, |
| | IF USING CONCRETE PADS, STRUCTURAL ENGINEER IS TO |
| | ADDRESS THE ADDITIONAL DEAD LOAD ON THE ROOF. |
| | |
| | 26.A1, OCCUPANT LOAD CANNOT BE LESS THAN FBC TABLE |
| | 1004 AS PER FBC1004.1.THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOT AREA USED |
| | TO CALCULATE OCCUPANT LOAD IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE |
| | SQUARE FOOT AREA OF THE SPACE.PLEASE REVISE. |
| | |
| | 27.PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER |
| | OF RECORD, FBC*106.3.3. |
| | |
| | 28.INCLUDE 2007 AMENDMENTS IN GOVERNING CODE |
| | EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2007. |
| | |
| | 29.SHOW ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND ACCESSIBLE PARKING, |
| | FBC1104.1.2, 11-4.1.2(1). |
