| Date |
Text |
| 2007-10-12 17:26:50 | RESIDENTIAL ADDITION BUILDING REVIEW SECOND CHECKLIST. |
| | REVIEW DONE UNDER 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE, 2004 |
| | EXISTING BUILDING CODE AND 2004 FBC. |
| | |
| | 1- RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT SUBMITTED STATES |
| | THAT EXPIRATION DATE IS SEPTEMBER, 25, 2007.REVISE |
| | EXPIRATION DATE AND RE-RECORD DOCUMENT AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. 713.13 FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| | |
| | 2- CHANCE HELICAL PIER FOUNDATION SYSTEM REQUIRES |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE 9B-72. |
| | INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS NOT AN APPROVED FLORIDA |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL. PROVIDE EITHER A FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL OR DADE COUNTY NOA. THEN, ARCHITECT TO REVIEW |
| | AND APPROVE SUCH PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 3-A) CHANCE HELICAL PIER FOUNDATION SYSTEM REQUIRES |
| | COMPLETE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AS REQUIRED BY |
| | INFORMATION SUBMITTED AND BY NOTE ON FOUNDATION PLAN |
| | SHEET S-1. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION. SEC. 106.1.2 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | B) PROVIDE SOIL TEST REPORT AS REQUIRED BY |
| | INFORMATION SUBMITTED AND REQUIREDFOR ENGINEER |
| | ANALYSIS OF THIS FOUNDATION SYSTEM. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 4- TYP. STAIR DETAIL 4/A3 DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED AND SHOW HANDRAIL HEIGHT TO VERIFY |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH SEC.R311.5.6.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA |
| | RESIDENTIAL CODE. |
| | |
| | 5- SHEET S-1: REVISE ALL STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS |
| | USP/SIMPSON SPECIFIED ON FIRST FLOOR AND LOW ROOF |
| | FRAMING/BRACING PLAN. NEED TO SPECIFYWOOD TO MASONRY |
| | CONNECTORS WHERE REQUIRED. REVISE PLAN AND DETAILS ON |
| | SHEET S-2 AS REQUIRED. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO |
| | FBC 2004. REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | ***NOTE: SEE CATALOG FOR PROPER CONNECTORS THAT ARE |
| | DESIGNED FOR WOOD TO MASONRY APPLICATIONS. CONNECTORS |
| | SPECIFIED ON PLAN AREDESIGNED FOR WOOD TO WOOD |
| | APPLICATIONS. ALSO, PROVIDE COMPLETE ENGINEERING |
| | ANALYSIS FOR NUMBER AND TYPE OF FASTENERS THAT DIFFER |
| | FROM THOSE TESTED AND PUBLISHED BY THE MANUFACTURER. |
| | SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 6- POLYSET ROOF TILE ADHESIVE NOA 04-1116.01 SUBMITTED |
| | CAN'T BE USED FOR THE ROOF TILE NOA SUBMITTED BECAUSE |
| | IT NEEDS TO BE LISTED IN THE ROOF TILE NOA IN ORDER TO |
| | VERIFY THE MOMENT OF RESISTANCE. SEE LIMITATIONS ON |
| | POLYSET NOA SUBMITTED.NEED TO PROVIDE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FOR ADHESIVE THAT IS LISTED IN THE ROOF TILE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC |
| | 2004. |
| | ALSO, REVISE ROOF ATTACHMENT DETAIL ON SHEET S-2 AS |
| | REQUIRED TO MATCH PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
