| Date |
Text |
| 2007-08-24 13:46:01 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 07070734 |
| | ADD: 480 HIBISCUS ST |
| | CONT: LATITE ROOFING |
| | TEL: (954)275-6024 |
| | BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | 1STREVIEW |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- |
| | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & |
| | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL |
| | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH |
| | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE |
| | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE |
| | FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR |
| | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | 2) FL S S 713.13NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED |
| | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT.NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE |
| | WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS NOT |
| | ACTUALLYCOMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING |
| | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) |
| | THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. |
| | |
| | 3) 2ND REVIEW, ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED |
| | BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL, THESTRUCTURAL ENGINEER |
| | DEL LOS REYES, THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER DOESN'T HAVE |
| | THEIR SHOP DRAWING STAMP INDICATING THEIR REVIEW WITH |
| | APPROVAL;WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. |
| | THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 |
| | SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR |
| | JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 4) 2ND REQUEST, PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO |
| | COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR |
| | INFORMATION PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE |
| | APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A COVER |
| | SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE |
| | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, |
| | SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR |
| | SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| | |
| | 5) SHEET S-8.4 IS A MINIATURIZED COPY BUT STILL |
| | REQUIRES THE ENGINEER OF RECORD TO SIGN AND SEAL SHEET. |
| | PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS |
| | PREPARED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND BEING FILED FOR |
| | PUBLIC |
| | RECORD SHALL HAVE THE SIGNATURE AND SEAL OF THE DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL AFFIXED TO THE DOCUMENT. |
| | FL STATE STAT: 61G15-23.002 ENGINEERS |
| | |
| | 6) THE FLAT ROOF NOA SUBMITTED 06-0626.05 WILL REQUIRE |
| | ENHANCED FASTENING WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ZONE# 3 IF TWO |
| | OR THREE ROWS ARE INSTALLED. PLEASE SUBMIT RAS 117 |
| | CALCULATION. |
| | NOTE BUILDING HEIGHT OF 119?-0? PLUS AN IMPORTANCE |
| | FACTOR OF 1.15 SEE STRUCTURAL SHEET S1.0. ) JOHN |
| | MANSVILLE REPORT NOA (06-0626.05) INDICATE LOW |
| | PRESSURES OF -75 PSF, WILL REQUIRE ENHANCED FASTENING |
| | SEE LIMITATION# 7 ; |
| | XX___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED STATESLIMITATION# 7, |
| | CALCULATIONS FROM RAS 117 SHALL BE SUBMITTED,THE |
| | FASTENERRESISTANCE BE LESS THAN THATREQUIRED, AS |
| | DETERMINED BY THEBUILDING OFFICIAL, A REVISED |
| | FASTENER SPACING, PREPARED , SIGNED AND SEALED BY A |
| | FLORIDA REGISTEREDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, REGISTERED |
| | ARCHITECT OR REGISTERED ROOF CONSULTANT MAY BE |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 7)THE SHOP DRAWINGS SUBMITTED BY LATITE ROOFING HAVE |
| | NEVER BEEN REVIEWED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONALS. WPB |
| | ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT |
| | WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED |
| | AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR |
| | TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 8) THE METAL ROOF SYSTEM SUBMITTED FIRESTONE METAL |
| | PRODUCTS NOA 06-0821.10 HAS A MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE |
| | OF-71.0 PSF FIELD |
| | |
| | -101.0 PSF PERIMETERS AND CORNERS |
| | SHEET 5 OF THE NOA INDICATES THE PANELS TO BE 16" WIDE |
| | OR 1.33 SQ FT. |
| | THE PLANS CLEARLY INDICATE A -75 PSF IN THE FIELD X |
| | 1.33 A RUNNING FOOT= 99.75 POUNDS PER RUNNING FOOT. |
| | SYSTEMS LIMITATION # 1 DOES NOT ALLOW FOR ENHANCEMENT. |
| | FOR THE CORNER OR END ZONES THE PLANS INDICATE A -85 |
| | PSF X 1.33 A RUNNING FOOT=113.05, AGAIN THE SYSTEM |
| | LIMITATION OF -101.0 NO ENHANCED FASTENING IS ALLOWED. |
| | ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY THE DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL, THESTRUCTURAL ENGINEER DEL LOS REYES, |
| | THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER DOESN'T HAVE THEIR SHOP DRAWING |
| | STAMP INDICATING THEIR REVIEW WITH APPROVAL;WPB ADMIN |
| | CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE |
| | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND |
| | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO |
| | SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II |
| | JIM WITMER C. B. O. |
| | |
| | TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| | FAX: (561)659-8026 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
