| Date |
Text |
| 2007-10-18 17:42:03 | 2004 FBC WITH 2006 AMENDMENTS |
| | NEW SFR |
| | CBS CONSTRUCTION |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | |
| | 1) A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT |
| | MUST BE SUBMITTED BEFORE A |
| | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
| | |
| | 2) IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY, PLANS STAMPED BY THEM AND |
| | COPY OF RECEIPT SUBMITTED TO CITY OF |
| | WEST PALM BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT, |
| | BEFORE A BUILDING PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. SUBMIT PLANS |
| | WITH ORIGINAL COUNTY STAMP AND COPY OF PAID IMPACT FEE |
| | RECEIPT. |
| | |
| | 3) SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS, PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL OR TECHNICAL BULLETIN SHOWING THAT THE SIMPSON |
| | HUS 28 CAN BE ATTACHED TO CONCRETE OR MASONRY WITH |
| | TITEN SCREWS OR SPECIFY ANOTHER CONNECTOR. |
| | |
| | 4)WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE |
| | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE |
| | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL |
| | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. THE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR |
| | THE ASPHALT ROOF SHINGLES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED IN |
| | WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. |
| | |
| | 5) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE EXTERIOR OUTSWING |
| | DOOR AT THE CARPORT AS REQUIRED BY FAC RULE 9B-72. IF |
| | IT IS THE SAME AS THE FRONT DOOR, PLEASE INDICATE ON |
| | THE FRONT DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 6) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE TAMKO ROOFING HAS BEEN |
| | REMOVED FROM THE SUBMITTAL. HOWEVER, IT IS STILL LISTED |
| | ON SHEET 1 OF THE PLANS AND SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR ENHANCED FASTENING FROM THE ENGINEER |
| | WERE SUBMITTED. PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | 7) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA FOR THE RIDGE VENT LIMITS |
| | IT TO A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 3 :12. THE PLANS SPECIFY A |
| | ROOF PITCH OF 2.5 : 12. PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 8) SHEET 4 OF THE PLANS HAS WHITE-OUT AND A LABEL TAPED |
| | TO THE PLANS CHANGING THE ROOFING MATERIAL. THIS IS NOT |
| | ALLOWED BY FBC 106.1.3 OF THE CITY AMENDMENTS. PLEASE |
| | CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 9) ASPHALT SINGLES ARE DESIGNED TO BE USED ON A SLOPED |
| | ROOF THAT ALLOWS THE RAIN WATER TO FLOW DIRECTLY OFF OF |
| | IT. THE INSTALLATION OF ASPHALT SHINGLES WITH THE ROOF |
| | SLOPING INTO THE PARAPET WALLS WILL CAUSE THE RAIN |
| | WATER TO BACK UP UNDER THE SHINGLES. THIS IS A VERY BAD |
| | DESIGN. SUBMIT A ROOFING APPLICATION STANDARD, |
| | MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS OR |
| | SPECIFICATIONS THAT ALLOWS THE SINGLES TO BE INSTALLED |
| | IN THIS WAY. |
| | |
| | 10) PLEASE PROVIDE CLARIFICATION AS TO HOW THE ROOF |
| | TRUSSES WILL BE ATTACHED AT THE EXTERIOR WALLS AND HOW |
| | THEY WILL BE SUPPORTED. IS THERE A 2 X PT WALL LEDGER |
| | WITH THE TRUSS HANGERS MOUNTED TO IT? THE SCUPPER |
| | DETAILS SHOW THE ENDS OF THE TRUSSES EXTENDING INTO THE |
| | EXTERIOR WALLS. |
| | |
| | 11) PLEASE DO NOT STAPLE THE PRODUCT APPROVALS TO THE |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| | (561)805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
