| Date |
Text |
| 2007-08-05 15:33:36 | ---------------DENIED----------------- |
| | |
| | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2005 AND 2006 AMENDMENTS FBC |
| | CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | |
| | 1. BASED ON THE DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, |
| | APPLICATIONS FOR TENANT IMPROVEMENT PERMITS PRIOR TO |
| | C.O. OF THE BASE BUILDING REQUIRE SHOP DRAWING REVIEW |
| | BY THE BASE BUILDING DESIGNER(S) OF RECORD. HAVE |
| | DESIGNER(S) OF RECORD REVIEW CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS |
| | PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL AND, IF FOUND SUFFICIENT, AFFIX |
| | THEIR SHOP DRAWING REVIEW STAMP AND SIGNATURE ON SAID |
| | DOCUMENTATION. |
| | |
| | 2. AT THIS TIME THE BUILDING IS NOT EXISTING AS A C.O |
| | HAS NOT BEEN ISSUED. ADDITIONALLY, THE ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR THE BASE BUILDING ARE BASED ON |
| | ASSUMPTIONS FOR A SHELL BUILDING UNDER FBC 13-101.1.6. |
| | UNLESS THE BUILDING IS COMPLETED AS PER ALL ASSUMPTIONS |
| | MADE IN THE ORIGINAL CODE COMPLIANCE SUBMITTAL, A |
| | REVISED CODE SUBMITTAL(S) USING METHODS A, B OR C SHALL |
| | BE SUBMITTED WHEN COMPLETION OF THE BUILDING (OR PART |
| | OF THE BUILDING) IS PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | 3. M0.1: IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS, SCHEDULES REFERENCE |
| | ASHRAE 62-01. NOTE THAT PER FBC 2004 W/ 2006 UPDATES, |
| | THE CORRECT REFERENCE STANDARD IS ASHRAE 62.1-2004. |
| | ALSO, THE CODE ALLOWS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ETHER FBC,M |
| | TABLE 403.3 OR ASHRAE 62.1-2004. RATHER THAN CITING |
| | BOTH STANDARDS AT ONCE, ONE METHOD OF COMPLIANCE OR THE |
| | OTHER SHOULD BE DECLARED ON PLANS. FBC 106.1.1 |
| | |
| | 4. M0.1 FAN SCHEDULE: CONTROL FOR EXHAUST FANS IS |
| | STATED AS "LIGHT INTERLOCK." EXHAUST FANS IN TOILET |
| | ROOMS SHALL RUN CONTINUOUS OR WHENEVER AIR IS BEING |
| | SUPPLIED TO THE SPACE AS ALL AIR SUPPLIED TO SPACES |
| | REQUIRED TO HAVE MECHANICAL EXHAUST SHALL BE EXHAUSTED |
| | PER FBC,M 403.2.1. |
| | NOTE: PROVISIONS SHALL ALSO BE MADE TO ASSURE |
| | VENTILATION IS PROVIDED WHENEVERA ROOM OR SPACE IS |
| | OCCUPIED PER FBC,M 401.3. |
| | |
| | 5. M2.1: EF-1 AND EF-2 DUCTS ARE UNDER POSITIVE |
| | PRESSURE AND THEREFORE SHALL NOT BE LOCATED IN OR PASS |
| | THROUGH A PLENUM PER FBC,M 601.3. |
| | |
| | 6. M2.1 NOTE #8: THIS NOTE INDICATES WALLS ARE ONLY TO |
| | EXTEND TO CEILING HEIGHT. HOWEVER, FLOOR PLAN AND WALL |
| | DETAIL ON PG ID-1A SHOW THE WALL BETWEEN ROOMS 103 AND |
| | 104 AS TYPE "B" WHICH IS CONTINUOUS FROM FLOOR TO DECK. |
| | THIS WILL NOT ALLOW FOR RETURN OF AIR IN PLENUM SPACE |
| | TO THE AIR HANDLING EQUIPMENT. COORDINATE PLANS AND |
| | SHOW HOW BALANCED RETURN IS TO BE ACHIEVED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH FBC,M 601.4. |
| | |
| | 7. M2.1 GENERAL NOTES: NOTE CALLS FOR NO CEILING IN |
| | ROOM 104. HOWEVER, FLOOR PLAN SHOWS 24X24 LAY-IN TYPE |
| | DIFFUSERS AND GRILLS. PLAN ALSO SHOWS HP-1 ABOVE A |
| | CEILING WITH AN ACCESS PANEL. PLEASE CLARIFY. ALSO, IF |
| | THERE IS NO CEILING IN ROOM 104, IT MAY BE CONSIDERED |
| | PART OF THE PLENUM SPACE AND WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE |
| | RESTRICTIONS OF FBC,M 602.2.1 AND NFPA 90A-02 SEC |
| | 4.3.10. |
| | |
| | 8. M2.1: SIZES OF LARGE RECTANGLE DUCTS FROM MECH ROOM |
| | ARE NOT SHOWN ON PLANS. PLEASE CLARIFY AND RESUBMIT. |
| | |
| | 9. INSTALLATION OF FIRE DAMPERS IN TRANSFER OPENINGS IN |
| | THE NEW TENANT SEPARATION WALLS MAY INTERFERE WITH THE |
| | PERFORMANCE OF THE BASE BUILDING SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM |
| | AND AS SUCH IS PROHIBITED PER FBC,M 607.2.1. PLEASE |
| | SHOW MEANS OF APPROVED ALTERMANTIVE PROTECTION FOR |
| | THESE OPENINGS. |
| | |
| | 10. M2.1: SOME GRILL AND CFM DESIGNATIONS ARE MISSING |
| | FROM PLAN IN ROOM 102. PLEASE CORRECT AND RESUBMIT. |
| | |
| | 11. M2.1: HP-1, PLEASE SHOW SOURCE AND ROUTING OF |
| | CONDENSER WATER PIPING FOR THE HEAT PUMP. ALSO SHOW THE |
| | MEANS AND LOCATION OF CONDENSATE DISPOSAL TO BE IN |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC,M SEC 307.2. NOTE: ALSO SHOW |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC 13-411.1.ABC.1.4 FOR WATER FLOW |
| | CONTROLS. |
| | |
| | 12. M5.1 SOUND BOOT DETAIL: PLEASE REFERENCE THE |
| | CORRECT CODE UNDER WHICH THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED (FBC |
| | 2004). |
| | |
| | 13. ENGINEER HAS NOT USED FULL SIGNATURE TO SIGN/SEAL |
| | MECHANICAL PLANS AS REQUIRED BY F.S. 471. IT APPEARS |
| | THAT THE ENGINEER HAS USED INITIALS WHEN COMPARED TO |
| | THE FULL SIGNATURE WHICH WAS USED TO SIGN/SEAL THE |
| | PLUMBING PLANS IN THIS SAME SET OF DRAWINGS. PLEASE |
| | CORRECT AND RESUBMIT. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: |
| | RONALD J REGUEIRO |
| | 561.805.6719 |
| | [email protected] |
