| Date |
Text |
| 2007-10-02 14:44:50 | 2004 FBC W/2007 REVISIONS |
| | LEVEL 2 ALTERATIONS |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | |
| | 1) SUBMIT REVISED ENERGY CALCULATIONS. PER THE GENERAL |
| | DEFINITIONS AT THE END OF THE ENERGY FORM, ALL R-VALUES |
| | AND EFFICIENCIES INSTALLED MUST MEET OR EXCEED THE |
| | MINIMUM VALUES LISTED ON THE FORM. COMPONENTS AND |
| | EQUIPMENT NOT BEING INSTALLED OR RENOVATED MAY BE LEFT |
| | BLANK. THE R-VALUE OF 4.2 SPECIFIED ON SHEETS 3 AND 4 |
| | OF THE PLANS DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM OF R-5 REQUIRED |
| | BY THE ENERGY FORM. IF THE CENTRAL A/C IS NOT BEING |
| | ADDED OR RENOVATED AS INDICATED IN THE LETTER THAT WAS |
| | SUBMITTED LEAVE THOSE LINES BLANK. THE OWNER/AGENT IS |
| | REQUIRED TO SIGN THE FORM. SEE FBC CHAPTER 13. |
| | |
| | 2) THE NOTES ON SHEET 1 SPECIFY A NEW 4" SLAB POURED |
| | OVER THE EXISTING SLAB. ON SHEET 2 A NEW 6" SLAB IS |
| | SPECIFIED OVER THE EXISTING SLAB. ON SHEET 1 THE |
| | EXISTING SLAB IS SHOWN AT 4" BELOW THE FINISH FLOOR |
| | ELEVATION OF THE LIVING AREA. IT APPEARS THAT THE |
| | EXISTING SLAB WILL NEED TO BE REMOVED IN ORDER TO |
| | INSTALL THE 6" STRUCTURAL SLAB REQUIRED DUE TO THE POOR |
| | SOIL CONDITIONS. PLEASE REVIEW AND MAKE |
| | CORRECTIONS.CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 106.1.2. |
| | |
| | 3) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE MULLIONS FOR THE |
| | TWO WINDOWS THAT ARE MULLED TOGETHER. FAC RULE 9B-72. |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT WAS SUBMITTED FOR THE |
| | EXTERIOR DOOR IS EXPIRED AND IS FOR A NON-IMPACT GLAZED |
| | OUTSWING DOOR. THE PLANS INDICATE A SIX PANEL METAL |
| | DOOR WITH NO GLASS AND THE STORM PANEL SCHEDULE DOES |
| | NOT LIST THIS DOOR. CHANGE THE PRODUCT APPROVAL OR THE |
| | PLANS FOR THIS DOOR. IF THIS IS A GLAZED DOOR, SPECIFY |
| | THE STORM PANELS OR OTHER IMPACT PROTECTION REQUIRED BY |
| | R301.2.1.2. |
| | |
| | 5) ON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE ROOF COVERING |
| | SPECIFY THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY AND FASTENING ASSEMBLY |
| | THAT WILL BE INSTALLED. PROVIDE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS |
| | FOR ENHANCED FASTENING IF PRESSURES ARE TOO LOW. CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 106.1.2. |
| | |
| | 6) THE STORM PANEL SCHEDULE THAT WAS SUBMITTED DOES NOT |
| | CORRESPOND WITH THE PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT WAS |
| | SUBMITTED. THE 40" SPAN FOR OPENING #2 IS LESS THAN THE |
| | OPENING SIZE. THE ANCHOR IN THE TABLE SHOULD BE |
| | PANELMATE PLUS NOT TAPCON. CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC |
| | 106.1.2. |
| | |
| | NOTE: IN ORDER TO REUSE EXISTING DOORS AND WINDOWS, |
| | THEY MUST HAVE CURRENT PRODUCT APPROVALS. IF THE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT ARE SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED DO |
| | NOT MATCH THE PRODUCTS THAT ARE BEING REINSTALLED THEY |
| | CAN NOT BE USED. THEY WILL BE VERIFIED BY THE INSPECTOR |
| | IN THE FIELD AND WILL HAVE TO BE REPLACED IF THEY DON'T |
| | HAVE CORRESPONDING PRODUCT APPROVALS. FAC RULE 9B-72 |
| | |
| | - ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| | (561)805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
