| Date |
Text |
| 2007-07-12 19:00:50 | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | |
| | 1)) FBC* 1804.2.2AREA OF QUESTIONABLE |
| | SOIL.SUBMIT A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT |
| | TO VERIFY THE SAFE BEARING CAPACITY OF |
| | THE SOIL. |
| | |
| | 2) SPECIFY THE REQUIRED SOIL BEARING CAPACITY FOR THE |
| | DESIGN. FBC* 106.1.2 |
| | |
| | 3) WINDOWS W1,W2 AND W3 IN THE SCHEDULE ON 3.0 ARE NOT |
| | EGRESS WINDOWS AS SPECIFIED. THEY DO NOT HAVE THE |
| | REQUIRED MINIMUM CLEAR OPENING HEIGHT OF 24". FBC |
| | R310.1 |
| | |
| | 4) SUBMIT ENERGY CALCULATIONS FOR THE ADDITION AS |
| | REQUIRED BY FBC CHAPTER 13. |
| | |
| | 5) REVISE ROOF SHEATHING NAILING NOTES ON 4.0 AND 6.0. |
| | THE ROOF SHEATHING IS REQUIRED TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | SECTION R803.2.3.1 OF 2006 REVISIONS TO 2004 FBC |
| | RESIDENTIAL CODE. WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL SHEATHING SHALL |
| | BE FASTENED TO ROOF FRAMING WITH 8D RING-SHANK NAILS AT |
| | 6 INCHES ON CENTER AT EDGES AND 6 INCHES ON CENTER IN |
| | THE FIELD FOR ROOF ZONES 1 AND 2. SPACING OF RING-SHANK |
| | FASTENERS SHALL BE 4 INCHES ON CENTER IN NAILING ZONE 3 |
| | FOR 130 MPH OR GREATER DESIGN WIND SPEEDS IN ACCORDANCE |
| | WITH FIGURE R803.2.3.1. |
| | |
| | 6) THE TITLE BLOCK OF THE DRAWINGS SPECIFY 1/4" SCALE |
| | FOR THE DRAWINGS. SEVERAL OF THE DRAWINGS ARE NOT THIS |
| | SCALE AND SOME SHEETS HAVE TWO OR MORE DIFFERENT SCALE |
| | DRAWINGS ON THEM. PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 7) SECTION B ON 4.0 SHOWS AN UNSUPPORTED OVERHANG OF |
| | 5". PLEASE REVISE SO THAT ROOF FRAMING WILL SUPPORT THE |
| | OVERHANG. |
| | |
| | 8) THERE IS A VOID SHOWN BETWEEN THE TOP OF THE CONC. |
| | TIE BEAM AND THE BOTTOM OF THE RAFTERS ON SECTION B ON |
| | 4.0. PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | 9) THE INTERNAL WALL DETAIL ON 6.0 SPECIFIES A 4" |
| | CONCRETE SLAB AND SECTION A ON 4.0 HAS A 6" SLAB. |
| | PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 10) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE WINDOWS, |
| | STRUCTURAL MULLIONS AND ROOFING MATERIAL. THE EXISTING |
| | WINDOWS AND DOORS CAN ONLY BE RE-INSTALLED IF THEY HAVE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS. |
| | |
| | 11) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA SUBMITTED FOR THE POMA |
| | STORM PANELS IS EXPIRED. SUBMIT FL COVERSHEET AND |
| | CURRENT NOA. |
| | |
| | 12) SOME OF THE INFORMATION ON THE STORM PANEL SCHEDULE |
| | IS INCORRECT. THE FL# AND NOA# DO NOT CORRESPOND TO THE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT WAS SUBMITTED. THE SHUTTER |
| | MOUNTING REFERS TO THE TYPE OF MOUNT OR CONNECTION |
| | TYPE, FOR EXAMPLE DIRECT MOUNT, ETC. THE ANCHOR TYPE |
| | MUST BE ONE OF THE ONES LISTED IN THE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 13) THE NOA SUBMITTED FOR THE JELD-WEN DOOR HAS PARTS |
| | THAT ARE ILLEGIBLE. SUBMIT CLEAN AND CLEAR COPIES. |
| | |
| | 14) THE DOOR NOA IS FOR A GLAZED DOOR WITH NO IMPACT |
| | RATING AND WILL REQUIRE STORM PANELS FOR IMPACT |
| | PROTECTION. THE DOOR WAS NOT SHOWN ON THE STORM PANEL |
| | SCHEDULE. THE DOOR IS NOT SPECIFIED AS HAVING GLAZING |
| | ON THE PLANS. PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | 15) THE VALUE OF THE PROJECT HAS BEEN ADJUSTED TO $ |
| | 37,426.00 BASED ON ICC COST DATA. ADDITIONAL PERMIT |
| | FEES ARE DUE. |
| | |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| | (561)805-6714 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
