| Date |
Text |
| 2007-09-06 10:13:29 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC* |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 FAC |
| | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FSFLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | 1.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 2.)FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL REQUIRED |
| | IN ADDITION TO THE NOA SUBMITTED, FAC9B72. |
| | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, ENGINEER REQUESTED CLARIFICATION.PLEASE |
| | FIND THE FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR EACH NOA. |
| | THIS CAN BE DONE BY SEARCHING BY MANUFACTURER AT THE |
| | WEBSITE REFERENCED, WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG.IF A |
| | FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL IS NOT AVAILABLE, PLEASE |
| | ADVISE AND A LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL CAN BE ISSUED FOR |
| | FBC COMPLIANT PRODUCTS USING THE NOA.THE REVIEW FOR |
| | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL WILL BE DONE IF IT IS DETERMINED |
| | THAT A FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL HAS NOT BEEN |
| | ISSUED. |
| | |
| | 3.)GOVERNING CODE IS TO INCLUDE 2005 AND 2006 |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, PLANS WERE CHANGED SO THAT THE STAIR NOTES |
| | REFER TO 2005 AND 2006 LOCAL AMENDMENTS.THE REQUEST |
| | IS TO ESTABLISH GOVERNING CODE ON THE PLAN BASED ON |
| | APPLICATION DATE.2006 AMENDMENTS ARE APPLICABLE IN |
| | THIS CASE.THESE ARE NOT LOCAL AMENDMENTS; THEY ARE |
| | AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 AT THE |
| | STATE LEVEL. |
| | |
| | 4.)N/A |
| | |
| | 5-10)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 11.)A1, THE ROOF IS A FLAT DECK WITH NO PARAPET WALL |
| | SHOWN; PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE CORNER PRESSURE OF |
| | -62.8. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW - ENGINEER RESPONDED WITH TWO STATEMENTS; |
| | ONE THAT THE NUMBER IS CONSERVATIVE (BUT NO |
| | CALCULATIONS PROVIDED) AND THAT SINCE ROOF WORK WAS |
| | REMOVED FROM THE PLAN, THE PRESSURE IS NOT NECESSARY. |
| | |
| | IF THE PRESSURES ARE ON THE PLAN, THEY ARE TO BE |
| | CORRECT.IT APPEARS THAT THE ENGINEER MAY BE USING THE |
| | TOTAL ZONE 3 AREA OF 16FEET (4X4) OR IS CALCULATING |
| | ROOF WIND PRESSURES USING MWRS.I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE |
| | FBC TABLE 1609.6A WHICH THE ENGINEER REFERS TO IN HIS |
| | RESPONSE LETTER (THE TABLE NUMBER MAY HAVE BEEN |
| | MODIFIED WITH THE 2005/2006 AMENDMENTS) BUT IT APPEARS |
| | THAT YOU ARE REFERRING TO FBC TABLE 1609.6.2.1(1), |
| | SIMPLIFIED DESIGN WIND PRESSURE (MAIN |
| | WINDFORCE-RESISTING SYSTEM).PLEASE SEE FBC1609.2, |
| | DEFINITIONS, EFFECTIVE WIND AREA.FOR CLADDING |
| | FASTENERS, THE EFFECTIVE WIND AREA SHALL NOT BE GREATER |
| | THAN THE AREA THAT IS TRIBUTARY TO AN INDIVIDUAL |
| | FASTENER.SEE ALSO FBC TABLE 1609.6.2.1(2) NET DESIGN |
| | WIND PRESSURE (COMPONENT AND CLADDING), FLAT ROOF, ZONE |
| | 3, LESS THAN 10SF, HAS A DESIGN PRESSURE OF -89. |
| | |
| | YOU MAY REMOVE THIS NUMBER, REVISE THE NUMBER, OR |
| | PROVIDE CALCULATIONS AS ORIGINALLY REQUESTED. |
| | |
| | 12.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 13.)EXTERIOR STAIRS TO COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS |
| | OF FBC1022.SHOW FIRE RESISTANCE RATING FOR THE WALL |
| | AS WELL AS OPENINGS. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, THE WINDOWS ARE ALSO REQUIRED TO BE |
| | PROTECTED (ONLY DOORS SHOWN AS RATED).HOWEVER, SEE |
| | THE EXCEPTION FBC1019.1 EXCEPTION 4, AND FBC1022.6.IF |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC1019 CAN BE SHOWN FOR THE EXISTING |
| | STAIR, IT APPEARS THAT THE NEW STAIR MAY FALL UNDER THE |
| | EXCEPTION. |
| | |
| | 14.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 15-17)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 18.)SEE ATTACHED POLICY IN REGARDS TO HURRICANE |
| | SHUTTERS, ITEM 13.SUBMIT AN INSTALLATION PLAN.USE |
| | OF REMOVABLE SHUTTERS ON COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS MUST BE |
| | APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.THIS MAY BE DONE |
| | INDEPENDENTLY FROM THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS AND A |
| | PRELIMINARY PLAN CAN BE SUBMITTED VIA EMAIL TO |
| | [email protected] DO NOT SUBMIT THIS PLAN WITH THE |
| | PERMIT APPLICATION RESUBMITTAL AS THIS SHOULD BE |
| | RESOLVED PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL.FAILURE TO ADDRESS THIS |
| | COMMENT WILL RESULT IN DELAYS IN PERMITTING.PLEASE |
| | CONTACT ME IF YOU NEED FURTHER INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, DISCUSSED WITH CONTRACTOR BUT NOT |
| | ADDRESSED.NO PLAN WAS SUBMITTED.THIS IS REQUIRED. |
| | ENGINEER PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PLAN WILL BE REQUIRED TO |
| | SHOW WHERE THE SHUTTERS WILL BE STORED AND HOW THIS |
| | AREA WILL BE SECURED.THIS MAY AFFECT FIRE RESISTANCE |
| | REQUIREMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 19-23.)ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 24.)PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR PENETRATIONS THROUGH THE |
| | FIRE RATED WALLS AND FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLIES FBC7. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT FIRE RATINGS |
| | FOR OPENINGS ARE SHOWN.THIS COMMENT REFERS TO |
| | PENETRATIONS.PLEASE ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 25-26.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 27.)SEE ATTACHED INSTALLATION SCHEDULE.EITHER |
| | COMPLETE THIS FORM OR PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION |
| | IN ANOTHER FORMAT FOR THE HURRICANE SHUTTERS.THIS |
| | SHOULD CORRELATE WITH A KEY PLAN SHOWING SHUTTER |
| | LOCATIONS.THIS APPLIES TO FIRST FLOOR WINDOWS ONLY. |
| | SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS ARE REQUIRED TO BE IMPACT RATED |
| | (WITH THE POSSIBLE EXCEPTION OF THE NEW W4 WINDOWS |
| | WHICH HAVE ACCESS FROM THE BALCONY). |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 28.)EXTERIOR CHANGES TO THE PLAN WILL REQUIRE |
| | HISTORIC REVIEW PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 29-33.) ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 34.)DECLARE LEVEL OF ALTERATION, FBC EB CHAPTER 3. |
| | |
| | 35.)THE SMOKE ALARMS SHOWN DO NOT COMPLY WITH |
| | FBC907.2.10.1.2(2).NO SMOKE ALARMS SHOWN IN THE |
| | SLEEPING ROOMS AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 36.)FOR THE NON IMPACT WINDOW, CIRCLE ON THE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL WHICH GLASS OPTION YOU ARE USING AS NOT ALL |
| | ARE COMPLIANT FOR THE DESIGN PRESSURE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 37.)NON IMPACT AND IMPACT FIXED WINDOW PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS SUBMITTED.WHERE WILL THEY BE INSTALLED? THE |
| | PLAN SHOWS SINGLE HUNG ONLY ON THE ELEVATIONS, AND THE |
| | WINDOW SCHEDULE DOES NOT DESIGNATE TYPE OF WINDOW. ALSO |
| | PLEASE REVISE PLAN TO DESIGNATE WHICH WINDOWS WILL BE |
| | IMPACT AND WHICH WINDOWS ARE PROPOSED AS NON IMPACT (TO |
| | BE APPROVED BY BUILDING OFFICIAL, SEE ITEM 18). |
| | |
| | 38.)SEE FBC EB 704.1, FBC903.2.7 REGARDING FIRE |
| | SPRINKLER REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 39.)WHEN RESUBMITTING, PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER |
| | INDICATING HOW EACH COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | |