| Date |
Text |
| 2008-05-29 14:14:35 | REVIEW #: 3RD |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2005 AND 2006 SUPPLEMENTS |
| | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AS WELL AS DESIGNER'S WRITTEN |
| | RESPONSES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUITY. |
| | |
| | 1-5: OK |
| | |
| | 6A ? 6C: OK |
| | |
| | 6D: A SYSTEM SIZING SUMMARY HAS BEEN PROVIDED IN LIEU |
| | OF COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS AS ALLOWED UNDER EXCEPTION |
| | #1 OF FBCB 13-407.1.ABC.1. HOWEVER, THIS EXCEPTION |
| | REQUIRES THAT THE SYSTEM SIZING SUMMARY BE SIGNED AND |
| | SEALED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. THE SYSTEM SIZING |
| | SUMMARY WHICH WAS SUBMITTED IN RESPONSE TO THIS COMMENT |
| | WAS NOT SIGNED AND SEALED. PLEASE CORRECT AND |
| | RESUBMIT. |
| | |
| | 7. OK. LOUVERS INCLUDED IN PRODUCT APPROVAL PACKAGE AND |
| | WILL BE REVIEWED BY BUILDING PLAN REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | 8-15: OK |
| | |
| | 16. FAN SCHEDULE ON PAGE M3-103 STILL CALLS FOR EF81 |
| | AND EF 83 TO BE CONTROLLED BY LIGHT SWITCH RATHER THAN |
| | INTERLOCKED WITH AH4 AS INDICATED IN WRITTEN RESPONSE |
| | (DATED 3/14/08) TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT (DATED |
| | 2/7/08) . PLEASE CORRECT AND RESUBMIT. FBCM 403.2.1. |
| | |
| | 17. OK |
| | |
| | 18. FAN SCHEDULE ON M3-103 STILL CALLS FOR EF84 TO BE |
| | CONTROLLED BY WALL SWITCH RATHER THAN RUN CONTINUOUS AS |
| | STATED IN WRITTEN RESPONSE (DATED 3/14/08) TO PREVIOUS |
| | REVIEW COMMENT (DATED 2/7/08). FBCM 404. |
| | |
| | 19. OK |
| | |
| | 20. ATTACHMENT DETAILS WITH SUPPORTING CALCULATIONS |
| | HAVE BEEN PROVIDED AND WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING |
| | PLAN REVIEWER. HOWEVER, NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED, AS |
| | PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED, DEMONSTRATING THAT THE OUTDOOR |
| | APPLIANCES ARE DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND ANTICIPATED WIND |
| | PRESSURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 301.13. |
| | |
| | 21 AND 22: OK |
| | |
| | 23. THE THROUGH-PENETRATION FIRESTOP DETAILS PROVIDED |
| | ON PAGE M4-104 DO NOT INCLUDE ANY PENETRATING PIPES |
| | WHICH ARE INSULATED. WHAT SYSTEM IS TO BE USED FOR |
| | INSULATED PIPE? |
| | |
| | 24. OK |
| | |
| | 25. GENERATOR INFORMATION: PAGE E-203 INDICATES AN 840 |
| | GALLON IN-BASE FUEL TANK IS TO BE USED. THE FOLLOWING |
| | ISSUES NEED TO BE ADDRESSED: |
| | A) AS STATED IN FIRST AND SECOND REVIEWS, PROPOSED |
| | ABOVE GROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS WITH A FUEL STORAGE |
| | CAPACITY IN EXCESS OF 550 GALLONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO |
| | PALM BEACH COUNTY DERM FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE. NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED WITH THIS |
| | SUBMITTAL INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED FUEL TANK AND |
| | LOCATION HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY DERM. PBC DERM APPROVED |
| | PLANS SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH EACH SET OF PLANS |
| | SUBMITTED TO THIS JURISDICTION FOR PERMIT. SEE ORIGINAL |
| | COMMENT #25 (DATED 7/23/07) FOR PBC DERM CONTACT |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | B) THE SUBMITTAL PROVIDED FOR THE GENERATOR FUEL TANK |
| | INDICATES THAT THE MAXIMUM CAPACITY FOR AN IN-BASE FUEL |
| | TANK (WHICH IS SHOWN ON E-203) 77 GALLONS. THERE IS NO |
| | 840 GALLON IN-BASE TANK OPTION, AS INDICATED ON PLANS, |
| | IN THE SUBMITTAL FROM THE MANUFACTURER. PLEASE VERIFY |
| | THE TYPE OF TANK TO BE USED AS WELL AS A CAPACITY FOR |
| | THE TANK WHICH CORRESPONDS WITH THE MANUFACTURER?S |
| | SUBMITTAL DATA. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: |
| | RONALD J. REGUEIRO |
| | 561.805.6719 |
| | [email protected] |
