Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 07060707
Permit Number 07060707
Review Stop E
Sequence Number 3
Notes
Date Text
2008-06-12 12:32:13** DENIED 3RD REVIEW **
  
 ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE STILL ITEMS ON PREVIOUS REVIEWS
 WHICH ARE STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING THEREFORE SOME
 COMMENTS ARE REPEATED FROM INITIAL REVIEW AS WELL AS
 THE SECOND REVIEW.
  
 ** PLEASE ALSO SEE THERE ARE NEW COMMENTS DUE TO SOME
 ITEMS ONLY NOW SUBMITTED FOR FIRST REVIEW.
  
 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE AS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEWS
 COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND CHAPTER 13
 FOR ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE.
 PLEASE SEE ONCE AGAIN THE SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS
 ARE REQUIRED TO COORDINATE WITH PLANS. ALL SYSTEMS ON
 PLANS SHALL BE PLACED INTO THE INPUT DATA REPORT. THIS
 IS REQUIRED OF ALL LIGHTING ON PLANS AS WELL AS OTHER
 SYSTEMS SUCH AS BUILDING COMPONENTS. THE FOLLOWING
 ITEMS WILL ONCE AGAIN BE NOTED. THE INPUT DATA REPORT
 WILL BE NOTED AS IDR.
 PLEASE SEE 13-400.3.A, 13-415.1.A, 13-415.1.AB,
 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3. ALL LIGHTING
 ON PLANS SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE IDR FOR WATTAGE OF
 FIXTURES, THE TYPES OF FIXTURES, THE METHOD OF CONTROLS
 AND THE NUMBER OF FIXTURES. ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW
 EXAMPLES WERE GIVEN AS A BENEFIT TO HELP LOCATE ALL
 FIXTURES WHICH ARE CLEARLY SHOWN ON PLANS HOWEVER ARE
 NOT BEING SHOWN IN THE CALCULATIONS.
 ONCE AGAIN THIS REVIEWER WILL GIVE SOME EXAMPLES AND
 CAN NOT EXPRESS ENOUGH THE FOLLOWING IS NOT AN
 EXHAUSTED LIST NOR IS IT ALL ITEMS WHICH DO NOT
 COORDINATE.
  
 FOR EXAMPLE:
 PLEASE SEE EXTERIOR LIGHTING ON THE IDR WHICH DOES NOT
 INCLUDE ANY 400W OR 35W FIXTURES.THESE ARE ONLY TWO
 FIXTURES ON EXTERIOR WHICH ARE BEING NOTED. HOW IS THIS
 POSSIBLE WHEN THE PLANS CLEARLY SHOW TYPE *S-1* AND *L*
 ??HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE WHEN THE PLANS CLEARLY SHOW
 DOZENS OF MORE FIXTURES THAN WHAT IS SHOWN IN THE INPUT
 DATA REPORT?
 THESE TWO FIXTURES ALONE WERE SPECIFICALLY GIVEN AS A
 BENEFIT ON PREVIOUS REVIEW ALONG WITH OTHER YET THESE
 ARE STILL NOT IN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. THERE ARE
 OTHER FIXTURES ON PLANS WHICH ALSO DO NOT COORDINATE
 WITH THE NUMBER OF FIXTURES AND THE WATTAGE.
  
 FOR EXAMPLE:
 PLEASE SEE THE INTERIOR LIGHTING ON PLANS WHICH ARE ALL
 REQUIRED TO COORDINATE WITH THE IDR OF THE SUBMITTED
 ENERGY CALCULATIONS. PLEASE SEE ONE ZONE SUCH AS THE
 *SURRENDER LOBBY* DOES NOT COORDINATE WITH ALL LIGHTING
 ON PLANS. PLEASE SEE THE NUMBER OF FIXTURES AND WATTAGE
 OF THESE FIXTURES IN THIS AREA IS GREATER THAN THE
 NUMBER OF FIXTURES SHOWN ON THE IDR.
  
 FOR EXAMPLE:
 PLEASE SEE ALL METHOD OF CONTROLS IS REQUIRED TO BE
 AUTOMATIC PER CODE. HOW CAN MANUAL ON/OFF CONTROLS
 STILL BE NOTED IN THE IDR?
  
 FOR EXAMPLE:
 PLEASE SEE THE IDR SHOWS *HOSPITAL* AS THE ALLOWANCE
 FOR LIGHTING HOWEVER BASED ON THE BUILDING CODE AND
 DEFINITIONS IN NFPA-70 AS WELL AS NFPA-101 THIS CAN NOT
 BE CLASSIFIED AS A HOSPITAL. PLEASE SEE THE COVER SHEET
 FOR THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS DOES NOT SHOW HOSPITAL, IT
 SHOW OFFICE. PLEASE ADJUST THE IDR FOR INTERIOR
 LIGHTING ALLOWANCES IN THESE AREAS.
  
 ** AS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEWS, PLEASE BE SURE ALL
 ITEMS ON PLANS ARE PLACED INTO THE IDR/ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS.
 ** SAME AS PREVIOUS REVIEWS.
  
 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SOME LIGHTING CONTROLS DO NOT YET
 COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 13. PLEASE SEE MECHANICAL ROOM ON
 FIRST FLOOR WHERE *SHIPS* LADDER IS LOCATED. THIS ROOM
 SHOWS A TWIST TIME YET THIS ROOM ON SHEET E-104 ALSO
 SHOWS A 3-WAY SWITCH AND OCCUPANCY SENSOR. PLEASE
 EXPLAIN HOW THIS WILL OPERATE. PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING
 COMMENT WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED TIMERS. PREVIOUS
 REVIEW ALSO REQUESTED THE MAXIMUM TIMES TO BE NOTED ON
 PLANS. THE RESPONSE MENTIONS TO SEE NOTE ADDED TO
 PLANS. PLEASE SEE THE NOTE WAS ADDED HOWEVER THE CODE
 SECTION NOTED NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED. IT SHOULD BE
 13-415.1.ABC.1.1.( PLEASE ADJUST FOR POSSIBLE
 MISPRINT)
 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2.
 **PREVIOUS COMMENT AND NEW BASED ON DESIGN CHANGES.
  
 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC 11-4.27.4 AS TWIST TIMERS AS
 NOTED ON SYMBOL LEGEND MAY NOT BE USED AS THEY DO NOT
 MEET ADA MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS.
 **NEW COMMENT.
  
 4) NOTE: THE MANUFACTURES SPECS/CUT SHEETS ARE ONLY NOW
 BEING SUBMITTED FOR THE FIRST TIME FOR REVIEW. RESPONSE
 AND PLANS NOW SHOW THE OVER CURRENT PROTECTION FROM THE
 GENERATOR BEING REMOVED. THIS IS OK HOWEVER WHEN DOING
 SO THIS NOW REQUIRES THE CONDUCTORS FROM THE GENERATOR
 TO THE FIRST MEANS OF OVER CURRENT PROTECTION TO MEET
 445.13. THIS SECTION OF THE CODE REQUIRES THE
 CONDUCTORS TO BE SIZE AT A MINIMUM OF 115%. PLEASE BE
 AWARE OF THE TEMPERATURE RISE ON SPECS AS THE OUTPUT
 AMPERAGE IS GREATLY AFFECTED. EVEN IF THE OUTPUT IS THE
 LOWER OF THE FOUR SHOWN THE CONDUCTORS AS LISTED ARE
 STILL NOT LARGE ENOUGH. PLEASE KNOW AS THE TEMP RISE IS
 TYPICALLY THE 150C, OR 130C AS SHOWN THE OUTPUT
 AMPERAGE IS 1504 AMPS. THE CONDUCTORS PER 310.16,
 110.14 ARE RATED FOR 1550AMPS. THE 115% RATING FOR
 MINIMUM SHALL BE 1729.6, OR RATHER 1730AMPS MINIMUM.
 PLEASE SEE 240.4C, 310.16 AND 110.14. THE CONDUCTORS ON
 DEVICES RATED OVER 800AMPS SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THIS
 RATING. PLEASE ADJUST CONDUCTORS OR PLACE OVER CURRENT
 PROTECTION BACK ON GENERATOR.
 ** NEW COMMENT BASED ON CHANGES MADE TO DESIGN.
  
 5) NOTE: THE PREVIOUS REVIEWS REQUESTED THE SPECS FOR
 THE ATS. THESE WERE SUBMITTED AND THE GENERAL SHEET
 INDICATES SWITCHES RATED UP TO 4000AMPS.HOWEVER THE
 MANUFACTURES SPECS INSIDE THE PACKAGE DOES NOT INDICATE
 ANY 1600AMP ATS UNITS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. THEY LIST
 1200AMP BUT NOT THE OTHER. PLEASE PROVIDE COORDINATING
 MANUFACTURE SPECS. THIS MAY AFFECT AIC WITHSTAND
 RATINGS ETC.
 90.7, 110.3.
 FBC 106.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND
 COORDINATION.
 **PREVIOUS COMMENTS AND NEW COMMENT.
  
 6) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THE RESPONSE FOR SLAB ELEVATION
 DOES NOT CLEARLY GIVE ANY INFORMATION ON FLOOD ZONE.
 PLEASE KNOW THIS CAN BE A PROVISO AS THIS IS STRICTLY
 AN OPTIONAL STAND-BY SYSTEM HOWEVER THE EQUIPMENT IS
 STILL REQUIRED TO BE MOUNTED A MINIMUM OF 6INCHES ABOVE
 THE FLOOD LEVEL. A CERTIFICATION BY A LICENSED
 SURVEYOR, ENGINEER OR ARCHITECT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR
 ELEVATION VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION OF THE SLAB
 ONCE INSTALLED.
 ** THIS WAS ON PREVIOUS REVIEW AND AS NOTED CAN BE DONE
 AS A *PROVISO*.
  
 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING SHOWN THE UPPER AREA
 OF THE FIRST FLOOR MECHANICAL ROOM ON SHEET E-104 IS
 NOT THE SAME AS THE LIGHTING IN THE SAME ROOM AS SHOWN
 ON E-103.
 PLEASE COORDINATE.
 FBC 106.1.2
 ** NEW COMMENT AS ROOMS ARE NOW LABELED.
  
 8) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW AS THE EGRESS FROM THE SECOND
 LEVEL MECHANICAL ROOM IS NOW CLEAR AS DISCUSSED WITH
 OTHER REVIEWERS IT APPEARS THE EGRESS FROM MECHANICAL
 ROOM #2 IS OUTSIDE AND ACROSS THE ROOF BACK INTO
 MECHANICAL ROOM #1 AND THEN DOWN LADDER. PLEASE KNOW
 EGRESS LIGHTING FOR NORMAL AND EMERGENCY CONDITIONS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THIS ROOF AREA BETWEEN THE DOORS
 ON THE SECOND ROOM BACK INTO THE FIRST ROOM. NFPA-101
 7.8, 7.9.
 ** NEW COMMENT
  
 9) NOTE: PLEASE PLACE NOTE ON PLANS FOR BONDING OF
 METAL FRAMING PER 2704.1. THIS WAS CONFIRMED RECENTLY
 ON A STATE LEVEL THIS NOTE SHOULD BE ON PLANS.
 ** NEW COMMENT
  
 10) NOTE: THE PREVIOUS REVIEW REQUESTED TO SHOW
 COMPLIANCE FOR SOUND LEVELS OF FIRE ALARM HORN DEVICES
 PER FBC 11-4.28.2. RESPONSE MENTIONS TO SEE NOTE ADDED
 TO FA RISER. THE NOTE QUOTES THE SAME CODE SECTION AS
 GIVEN IN REVIEW. THE CODE MAY NOT BE QUOTED IN GENERAL
 IN LIEU OF GIVING SPECIFIC DETAILS. THE LEVEL(S) NEED
 TO BE SHOWN OR NOTED AS REQUIRED IN THE SECTION OF THE
 CODE. THE NOTE ALSO STATES LEVELS ARE REQUIRED DURING
 TESTING. THE LEVELS OF HORN DEVICES DURING INITIAL
 TESTING WOULD ACTUALLY BE LOUDER THAN LEVELS ACTUALLY
 HEARD DURING BUILDING OCCUPANCY. THE CODE REQUIRES THE
 LEVELS TO BE ABOVE THE OTHER MAXIMUM SOUND LEVELS IN
 ANY ONE AREA ETC. PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING TEXT IS
 EXTRACTED FROM THE CODE FOR CLARITY OF COMMENTS SO THE
 NOTES, DEVICES AND SOUND LEVELS OF DEVICES CAN BE
 ADJUSTED, SHOWN OR NOTED.
 **IF PROVIDED, AUDIBLE EMERGENCY ALARMS SHALL PRODUCE A
 SOUND THAT EXCEEDS THE PREVAILING EQUIVALENT SOUND
 LEVEL IN THE ROOM OR SPACE BY AT LEAST 15 DBA OR
 EXCEEDS ANY MAXIMUM SOUND LEVEL WITH A DURATION OF 60
 SECONDS BY 5 DBA, WHICHEVER IS LOUDER. SOUND LEVELS FOR
 ALARM SIGNALS SHALL NOT EXCEED 120 DBA.**
  
 11) NOTE: THE PREVIOUS REVIEW GAVE SEVERAL NOTES WITH
 RESPECT TO CIRCUITING AND EVEN GAVE SOME EXAMPLES.
 PLEASE SEE 210.52B1 AS THE MINIMUM OF TWO SMALL
 APPLIANCE CIRCUITS ARE REQUIRED ON PLANS. THESE SHALL
 NOT CONTAIN ANY OTHER ITEMS ON THESE CIRCUITS WITH THE
 EXCEPTION OF THE ITEMS LISTED IN THE 210.52B1. LIGHTING
 IS NOT PERMITTED TO BE ON THE SMALL APPLIANCE
 CIRCUITS.
 PLEASE SEE SHEET E-102 AS THE LIGHTING CIRCUITS SHOWN
 ARE CIRCUITS P4-1, P4-3 AND P4-5. PLEASE SEE THE PANEL
 SCHEDULE ON SHEET WHICH SHOWS ONLY TWO OF THESE
 LIGHTING CIRCUITS. CIRCUIT SHOWN AS P4-5 IS ACTUALLY
 *BLANK* ON SCHEDULE AS THIS IS NOTED AS *SPARE*. PLEASE
 ALSO SEE SHEET E-202 AS THIS CLEARLY SHOWS THE LIGHTING
 STILL BEING CIRCUITED TO THE SMALL APPLIANCE CIRCUITS
 AS THE SMALL APPLIANCE CIRCUITS ON THIS SHEET E-202 IS
 SHOWING P4-1 AND P4-3 AS THE SMALL APPLIANCE CIRCUITS.
 PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING TEXT WHICH IS EXTRACTED FROM
 THE CODE WHICH INDICATES WHICH ITEMS MAY ON THE SAME
 CIRCUITS AS THE SMALL APPLIANCE CIRCUITS.
 **(B) SMALL APPLIANCES
 (1) RECEPTACLE OUTLETS SERVED IN THE KITCHEN, PANTRY,
 BREAKFAST ROOM, DINING ROOM, OR SIMILAR AREA OF A
 DWELLING UNIT, THE TWO OR MORE 20-AMPERE
 SMALL-APPLIANCE BRANCH CIRCUITS REQUIRED BY
 210.11(C)(1) SHALL SERVE ALL WALL AND FLOOR RECEPTACLE
 OUTLETS COVERED BY 210.52(A), ALL COUNTERTOP OUTLETS
 COVERED BY 210.52(C), AND RECEPTACLE OUTLETS FOR
 REFRIGERATION EQUIPMENT.**
 THIS CAN BE FOR RECEPTACLE OUTLETS ONLY IN THESE AREAS,
 NO OTHER OUTLETS ARE PERMITTED. PLEASE ADJUST.
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEWS.
  
 12) NOTE: THE PREVIOUS REVIEW GAVE SEVERAL NOTES WITH
 RESPECT TO CIRCUITING AND EVEN GAVE SOME EXAMPLES.
 PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS REVIEWS WITH RESPECT TO
 REQUIRED ARC FAULT PROTECTION REQUIRED ON ALL OUTLETS
 IN BEDROOMS PER 210.12. THE PREVIOUS PANEL SCHEDULE
 ALONG WITH THE CURRENT REVISED PANEL SCHEDULE SUBMITTED
 CONTAINS TWO ASTERISK ( **) AT THE TOP OF THE PANEL
 SCHEDULE WHICH STATES THE CIRCUITS NOTED WITH THE TWO
 ASTERISK (**) ARE TO CONTAIN AFCI BREAKERS/ARC FAULT
 PROTECTION. PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS REVIEW GAVE
 SPECIFIC NOTE THAT NOT ALL CIRCUITS WHICH REQUIRED AFCI
 PROTECTION SHOWED THE ASTERISK (**). THE RESPONSE
 MENTIONS THE TWO CIRCUITS WHICH REQUIRE ARC FAULT
 PROTECTION PER THE 2005 NEC DOES SHOW THE PROTECTION.
 ** PLEASE SEE THE 2002 AS WELL AS THE 2005 NEC REQUIRES
 ARC FAULT PROTECTION FOR *ALL OUTLETS* INSIDE THE
 SLEEPING ROOMS. THIS PROTECTION IS NOT FOR RECEPTACLES
 ONLY. THIS IS FOR RECEPTACLES, LIGHTS, SMOKE ALARMS
 (WHEN 120V) , FANS ETC.
 PLEASE SEE THE PLANS STILL DO NOT SHOW ANY PROTECTION
 FOR THE OTHER OUTLETS IN THESE ROOMS. THE CIRCUITS
 WHICH INDICATE PROTECTION STILL ONLY SHOW THIS FOR
 *RECEPTACLES*. PLEASE SEE CIRCUITS NOTED AS P4-1 AND
 P4-5 DO NOT INDICATE PROTECTION.
 PLEASE SEE E-102 AND E-303. AS NOTED ABOVE IN NOTE #11
 CIRCUITS ALSO DO NOT CORRELATE.
 PLEASE COORDINATE PLANS, PLEASE ADJUST FOR CODE
 COMPLIANCE AND PLEASE LIST ALL REQUIRED BRANCH CIRCUITS
 WITH AFCI PROTECTION AS REQUIRED PER 2005 NEC.
 ** PREVIOUS REVIEWS
  
 13) NOTE: DINING ROOM WALL APPEARS TO REQUIRE A SECOND
 RECEPTACLE TO MEET WALL SPACING REQUIREMENTS PER
 210.52. WALL SPACE IS UNCLEAR AND IS BEING NOTED AS THE
 INDENTION IN WALL MAY OR MAY NOT BE CABINETS. AS THIS
 IS DOES NOT SHOW CABINETS AND APPEARS TO BE WALL,
 PLEASE ADD RECEPTACLE AS TOTAL LENGTH OF WALL FROM
 DOORWAY OF LAUNDRY ROOM TO DOORWAY AT FRONT DOOR
 APPEARS TO BE 12FT OR MORE.
 ** NEW COMMENT.
  
 14) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT THE MANUFACTURE SPECS/CUT SHEET
 SHOWING THE 42CIRCUIT PANELS AS 100AMP RATED. AS NOTED
 PREVIOUSLY PANELS AT 100AMP RATED AND 60AMP RATED ARE
 NOT KNOWN TO BE 42CIRCUIT. PLEASE SUBMIT SPEC/CUT
 SHEET. A SEARCH OF A FEW OF THE STANDARD MANUFACTURE
 DID NOT PRODUCE ANY LISTED 42CIRCUIT PANEL BOARDS WHICH
 WERE ONLY 100AMP RATED.
 NEC 110.3, 90.7
 FBC 106.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
  
 15) NOTE: PLEASE PLACE NOTE ON PLANS FOR COLOR CODING
 OF CONDUCTORS. THE SPECIFICATION DIVISION SPECS ARE NOT
 PART OF THE RECORD PLANS AND ARE NOT TYPICALLY USED
 DURING INSPECTIONS. THESE ARE NOT PART OF REVIEW FOR
 MINIMUM CODE COMPLIANCE. PLEASE PLACE NOTE ON
 RISER/ALONG WITH CONDUCTORS FOR BROWN, PURPLED AND
 YELLOW. 277/480V.
 90.4, 310.11,310.12 ETC
 FBC 106.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND
 COORDINATION.
 ** PREVIOUS COMMENTS.
  
 16) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTES WHICH
 MENTIONED THE RECEPTACLE WHICH APPEARED TO BE SHOWN
 ABOVE THE CEILING FOR WATER COOLERS. THE SECTION OF
 CODE GIVEN WAS THAT NO CORDS ARE PERMITTED ABOVE THE
 CEILING. THE RESPONSE COMMENT MENTIONED THESE
 RECEPTACLES ARE FOR REMOTE CHILLER UNIT ABOVE CEILINGS.
 THESE ARE NOT PERMITTED TO BE CORD AND PLUG CONNECTED.
 PLEASE SEE 400.8 AND PLEASE REVISE DESIGN.
 FBC 106.1.2.
  
 17) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW GAVE NOTICE TO
 FLORIDA STATUTES 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO REPEAT
 COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. THERE ARE SEVERAL CODE
 SECTIONS WHICH HAVE BEEN REPEATED FOR THE THREE
 REVIEWS. THE FEE IS A STATUTORY REQUIRED FEE AND IS NOT
 A LOCAL ORDINANCE, FINE OR REQUIRED BY THE LOCAL LEVEL.
 THE FEE IS ASSESSED TO THE DESIGN TEAM AS REQUIRED BY
 THE STATUTE. THE FEE IS THE PORTION OF THE BASE FEE
 ATTRIBUTED TO PLAN REVIEW TIMES FOUR. THE BASE PERMIT
 FEE OF THIS PROJECT IS $52,000. THE PORTION OF THAT FEE
 WHICH IS ATTRIBUTED TO PLAN REVIEW IS 30% OF THE BASE
 PERMIT FEE WHICH IS $15,600. THIS IS THE AMOUNT TIMES
 FOUR WHICH IS ASSESSED. THIS AMOUNT IS $62,400. THIS IS
 A STATUTE REQUIRED FEE WHICH IS REQUIRED TO BE PAID
 BEFORE PLANS ARE RESUBMITTED FOR THE FOLLOWING REVIEW.
 PLEASE KNOW THAT ONE SET OF ELECTRICAL PLANS ALONG WITH
 ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND OTHER POSSIBLE DOCUMENTS ARE
 BEING RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE.
 IT IS RECOMMENDED IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS TO PLEASE
 CONTACT THIS OFFICE/REVIEWER.
  
 *** PLEASE KNOW THERE MAY VERY WELL BE NEW COMMENTS ON
 THE NEXT REVIEW WHICH CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME DUE
 TO INFORMATION ETC NOT YET IN DESIGN OR ON PLANS.
  
 ** IMPORTANT**
 ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP
 FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE
 ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED
 SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING.
 DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS.
 PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY
 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS,
 SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO
 TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC.
 PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS
 SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE.
 THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID
 ANY DELAYS.
  
 PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW. IF
 THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS PLEASE DO NOT
 HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved