| Date |
Text |
| 2007-07-12 11:13:41 | BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST: |
| | 1- ENGINEER IS MISSING ALL HIS INFORMATION IN ALL |
| | DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTE AND |
| | SEC. 61G15-23.002 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. |
| | ENGINEER TO REVIEW THIS SECTION AND PROVIDE TITLE BLOCK |
| | WITH ALL THE REQUIRED INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 2- PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALSAS REQUIRED |
| | BY DCA RULE 9B-72 FOR: |
| | A) STORM SHUTTERS. AND, MARK ON SHUTTER DRAWINGS |
| | SPECIFIC MOUNTING CONDITIONS (EG: WALL MOUNTED) AND |
| | SPECIFIC ANCHOR TYPE AND SPACING TO USED.SEC. 106.1.2 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | B) ALL SIMPSON CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS BY THE |
| | ENGINEER. |
| | ***NOTE: PROVIDE ONLY THE PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE |
| | AND PAGE WHERE CONNECTOR IS SHOWN TO SAAVE PAPER AND |
| | MONEY. |
| | |
| | 3- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING)ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 4-DRAWING 2 OF 3 CALLS FOR NEW R19 INSULATION ON 2X4 |
| | WALLS.R19 CAN'T BE INSTALLED IN 2X4 WALLS BECAUSE IT |
| | DOESN'T FIT.INSULATION CAN'T BE SQUEEZED.REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED.SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 5- PROVIDE RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. 713.13 FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| | |
| | 6- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| | A) WRONG FORM WAS USED. THIS IS NOT NEW CONSTRUCTION |
| | AND NO ALL THE WALL THROUGHOUT ENTIRE HOUSE ARE BEING |
| | CHANGED AND PROVIDED WITH INSULATION.PROVIDE REQUIRED |
| | FORM. SEE CHAPTER 13 FBC 2004 FOR ADEQUATE FORM TO BE |
| | USED. |
| | ***NOTE: MAKE SURE 2006 REVISED FORM IS USED. |
| | |
| | B) PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| | INCLUDING BUILDER. |
| | |
| | C) WHICH CONCRETE EXTERIOR WALL IS GOING TO HAVE |
| | R4.1 INSULATION? |
| | |
| | C) OWNER/AGENTTO SIGN AND DATE AT BOTTOM OF FORM. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
