| Date |
Text |
| 2007-09-18 08:37:07 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC* |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 FAC |
| | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FSFLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | FROM PREVIOUS LIST: |
| | |
| | 1.)DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR THE BUILDING, JEFFREY |
| | GASPAR, IS TO REVIEW THE DRAWINGS (SHOP DRAWING REVIEW |
| | STAMP). |
| | |
| | 3RD REQUEST; NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 2.)SEE FBC TABLE 302.3.2.THE FIRE SEPARATION IS TO |
| | BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE 302.3.2 EXCEPT FOR |
| | NONSEPARATED USE, FBC302.3.1.IF THIS CAN BE A |
| | NONSEPARATED USE, PLEASE SHOW CALCULAATIONS ON THE PLAN |
| | FBC302.3.1, FBC TABLE 503. |
| | |
| | SEE COMMENT 3.A NONSEPARATED USE WAS DECLARED BUT THE |
| | PLANS DO NOT SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE 503. |
| | |
| | 3.)SHOW HOW THE NEW OCCUPANCY COMPLIES WITH FBC TABLE |
| | 503. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW - THE PLANS STATE THAT THIS IS A TYPE III B |
| | BUILDING, AND THAT THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | COMMENTARY STATES THAT A FBC 2001 TYPE V B IS NOW A |
| | TYPE III B.PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING - |
| | |
| | A.PLEASE ADVISE AS TO WHERE THIS LANGUAGE IN THE |
| | COMMENTARY IS LOCATED AS I AM UNABLE TO FIND IT.ALSO |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE INCONSISTENCY; THE 2001 CODE CLASSIFIED |
| | BUILDINGS AS "PROTECTED" AND "UNPROTECTED", NOT "A" OR |
| | "B". |
| | |
| | B.THE COMMENTARY AND THE CODE BOTH STATE THAT A 2HOUR |
| | FIRE RESISTANCE RATING IS REQUIRED FOR TYPE III B; SEE |
| | PAGE 6-2 OF THE COMMENTARY AND FBC602.3,FBC TABLE |
| | 601.ALSO SEE ATTACHED COMMENTARY WHICH I HAVE |
| | HIGHLIGHTED. |
| | |
| | C.PLANS STATE THAT THE EXTERIOR WALL IS 1 HOUR; |
| | THEREFORE, CANNOT BE A TYPE III B.IF THE PLANS ARE |
| | INCORRECT AND THE EXTERIOR BEARING WALLS ARE 2 HOUR, |
| | PLEASE REVISE PLAN AND PROVIDE A DETAIL SHOWING HOW THE |
| | EXISTING WALLS COMPLY WITH THE 2HOUR REQUIREMENT AS I |
| | BELIEVE THE BUILDING WAS PERMITTED WITH NO FIRE |
| | RESISTANCE REQUIRED FOR EXTERIOR WALLS. |
| | |
| | D.PLEASE SEE FBC 506.2 REGARDING FRONTAGE INCREASES; |
| | COULD THIS SECTION APPLY?CALCULATIONS WERE PROVIDED |
| | WHICH SHOW ALLOWABLE OPENINGS BUT DO NOT STATE DISTANCE |
| | TO PROPERTY LINE.BASED ON FBC TABLE 704.8, 45% |
| | INDICATES THAT EACH EXTERIOR WALL IS 20-25' FROM THE |
| | PROPERTY LINE; THEREFORE, IT APPEARS THAT A FRONTAGE |
| | INCREASE MAY POSSIBLY RESOLVE THE ISSUE. |
| | |
| | 5.)REGARDING IMPACT FEES, PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY HAS DETERMINED THAT IMPACT FEES ARE NOT |
| | REQUIRED AT THIS TIME.HOWEVER, FUTURE TENANT |
| | BUILDOUTS MAY REQUIRE AN IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT (PER |
| | WILLIE SWOPE AND GWEN, PALM BEACH COUNTY, 233-5025). |
| | |
