| Date |
Text |
| 2007-12-06 15:39:48 | |
| | |
| | DENIED |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE NOT ADDRESSED FROM THE 1ST |
| | REVIEW: |
| | |
| | 5)THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE |
| | 9B-72 (PRODUCT APPROVALS) SHALL BE REVIEWED AND |
| | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO |
| | SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL PER 106.3.3 FBC* |
| | *****THE PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DRAWINGS ARE |
| | REQUIRED TO REVIEW AND APPROVE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR |
| | USE, (IN THIS CASE MR. WILLIAM YURASEK)***** |
| | |
| | 6)SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF ENERGY CALC'S PER 13-101.2.2 |
| | FBC. BE SURE THAT THEY ARE SIGNED AND DATED BY PREPARER |
| | AND OWNER/AGENT PRIOR |
| | TO SUBMITTAL |
| | *****ENERGY CALC'S SHALL MATCH VALUES DESIGNATED IN THE |
| | DRAWINGS, NEW PITCHED ROOF AREA ON DRAWINGS SHOW R30 |
| | INSULATION BUT ENERGY CALC'S UNDER ATTIC IS R19, AREA |
| | OF EXISTING PORCH NOT ADDRESSED IN CALC'S, WOOD FRAME |
| | WALLS NOT ADDRESSED IN CALC'S, PLEASE NOTE THATWALLS |
| | WERE REVISED ON THE NEW DRAWING FROM 2X6 TO 2X4 BUT THE |
| | R-VALUE IS STILL R19 ON PAGE 2 CURTAIN WALL |
| | DETAIL****** |
| | |
| | 7)PHOTO COPIED, STAMPED OR REPRODUCED SIGNATURES ARE |
| | NOT ACCEPTABLE PER 471.025 F.S. PLEASE SEE THAT |
| | ENGINEERS SIGNATURE ON THE SOIL REPORT IS A PHOTOCOPY |
| | ALSO THE REPORT STATES THAT IT IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | THE 2001 FBC |
| | ******SIGNATURES HAVE NOT BEEN CHANGED TO |
| | ORIGINALS****** |
| | |
| | 10)IN AN EXISTING BUILDING WHERE ALTERATIONS ARE |
| | BEING MADE A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL MUST ELECT THE LEVEL |
| | OF ALTERATION PER 301.5 OF EXISTING BUILDING CODE AND |
| | STATE ALONG WITH THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ON THE |
| | DRAWINGS |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT: |
| | |
| | 1)PER 713.13(2) F.S. |
| | IF THE IMPROVEMENT DESCRIBED IN THE NOC HAS NOT |
| | COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS OF RECORDING, THE NOTICE IS |
| | VOID |
| | |
| | BLDG PLAN REVIEW |
| | ADRIAN MORSE |
| | 561-805-6716 |
