| Date |
Text |
| 2007-09-20 08:16:22 | CITYPLACE STAR BUCKS |
| | 650 S ROSEMARY AVE |
| | SEPT 20,2007 |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | |
| | PERMIT: 07050808 |
| | ADD: 650 S ROSEMARY AVE |
| | CONT: PEMBERTON BUILDING |
| | TEL: (561)744-3399 |
| | |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | 3RDREVIEW |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- |
| | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & |
| | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL |
| | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH |
| | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE |
| | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE |
| | FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR |
| | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | 2) COMPLIED.. |
| | |
| | 3) NOTE:FL S S 713.13NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE |
| | FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT.NOTE: 713.13(2) IF |
| | THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS |
| | NOT ACTUALLYCOMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE |
| | RECORDING THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: |
| | 713.13(6) THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT |
| | THE CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. |
| | |
| | 4) THIRD REQUEST, THE PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED |
| | REQUIRE FLORIDA COVERSHEETS. PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 |
| | ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION PLEASE SEE THE STATE |
| | WEBSITE AT WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH |
| | STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A |
| | COVER SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM |
| | THE STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE |
| | APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL OR SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. REPORTS |
| | MISSING THE FLORIDA APPROVAL COVERSHEETS ARE: |
| | 4A) PGT SERIES **PW-701** IS A NON-IMPACT WINDOW, |
| | PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION THAT THE EXISTING SHUTTERS ARE |
| | RATED FOR THE 140 MPH WIND ZONE & LARGE MISSILE |
| | TESTED. |
| | 4B) PGT SERIES HR-810 IS A HORIZONTAL ROLLER NOT USED |
| | SEE SHEET G2.0 |
| | 4C) FIXED WINDOW- SHEET G2.0 INDICATES NEW LARGE |
| | MISSILE RATED NO REPORTS SUBMITTED. |
| | 4D) FIREDOOR SERIES 4080 SINGLE |
| | 4E FIREDOOR SERIES S-6070 |
| | |
| | 5) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 6-8) COMPLIED. |
| | |
| | 9A)TRANSFORMER MOUNT THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN |
| | THE STRUCTURAL SHEET S2 AND THE ELECTRICAL SHEET E2. |
| | THE UPDATED S2 DOES NOW SHOW STEEL TUBING TO HANDLE THE |
| | LOADS OF THE BRAKET CARRYING THE TRANSFORMERS WEIGHT |
| | BUT THE E2 SHEET NEEDS TO CORRELATE THE THE SAME TYPE |
| | OF STRUCTURAL SUPPORT FORTHIS UNIT. DISCREPANCY BETWEEN |
| | PLANS, 106.1.2* |
| | |
| | 9B) THE SECOND ISSUE IS THE DRYWALL RUNS BEHIND |
| | BRACKET, THERE WOULD APPEAR TO BE CRUSHING CONCERNS |
| | THIS PORTION OF WALL WILL QUICKLY BE CRUSHED AND THE |
| | BRACKET BECOMING LOOSE! 106.1.2*? |
| | 102.1* WHERE, IN ANY SPECIFIC CASE, DIFFERENT SECTIONS |
| | OF THIS CODE SPECIFY DIFFERENT MATERIALS, METHODS OF |
| | CONSTRUCTION OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS, THE MOST |
| | RESTRICTIVE SHALL GOVERN. WHERE THERE IS A CONFLICT |
| | BETWEEN A GENERAL REQUIREMENT AND A SPECIFIC |
| | REQUIREMENT, THE SPECIFIC |
| | REQUIREMENT SHALL BE APPLICABLE. |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | JIM WITMER C. B. O. |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| | FAX: (561)659-8026 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
