| Date |
Text |
| 2007-08-15 12:08:01 | RESIDENTIAL ADDITION BUILDING REVIEW SECOND CHECKLIST: |
| | REVIEW DONE UNDER 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE AND FBC |
| | 2004 WITH 2006 REVISIONS. |
| | |
| | 1- NEED TO ADDRESS ZONING COMMENTS REGARDING SETBACKS. |
| | PLANS REVISIONS MAY BE REQUIRED. SEE ZONINGCOMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 2- PER SEC. 713.13 FLORIDA STATUTE NOTICE OF |
| | COMMENCEMENT EXPIRES AFTER 90 DAYS OF RECORDING IF WORK |
| | IS NOT STARTED. NOC EXPIRES ON 8-15-07. WILL NEED TO |
| | PROVIDE RE- RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. |
| | |
| | 3- PROVIDE COPY OF IMPACT FEES PAID RECEIPT AS |
| | REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS CHECKLIST. |
| | |
| | 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE |
| | 9B-72 FOR: |
| | A) GARAGE DOORS THAT MATCH DOORS SHOWN ON |
| | ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS AS REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | IN ADDITION BASE ON INFORMATION SUBMITTED THE FOLLOWING |
| | ITEMS NEED TO BE ADDRESSED: |
| | (1)FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL 4307AND NOA |
| | 03-0213.15 SUBMITTED DON'T CORRESPOND TO EACH OTHER. |
| | THESE ARE TWO DIFFERENT PRODUCT APPROVALS. PROVIDE |
| | COMPLETE INFORMATIONEITHERFOR THE FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL OR THE DADE COUNTY PRODUCT APPROVAL. ARCHITECT |
| | APPROVED THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE , BUT |
| | THERE ARE NOT DRAWINGS SHOWING WHICH MODEL HE APPROVED. |
| | HOW HE KNOWS THE PRODUCT APPROVAL IS GOOD FOR THE |
| | CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES? |
| | |
| | (2) NEED THE NAME OF PERSON APPROVING THE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL.WRITING"APPROVED"ON THE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL IS NOT ENOUGH INFORMATIONBECAUSE IT DOESN'T |
| | IDENTIFYTHE PERSON OR COMPANY APPROVING THE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL. TYPICALLY THE STANDARD SHOP DRAWINGS REVIEW |
| | STAMP WITH THE LOGO OR NAME OF THE COMPANY IS USED AND |
| | IS ACCEPTABLE TO COMPLY WITH THIS SECTION. |
| | |
| | B) METAL ROOF AT NEW CUPOLA REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | NOTE: MAKE SURE PRODUCT APPROVAL MEETS THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES OF TABLE 1609.6.2.1(2) FBC 2004 FOR ZONES 2 |
| | AND 3. |
| | |
| | C) WINDOW MULLIONS REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS CHECKLIST. |
| | |
| | D) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. |
| | BASED ON INFORMATION SUBMITTED THE FOLLOWING IS |
| | REQUIRED: |
| | (1) FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL7938 AND NOA |
| | 02-0719.05 DON'T CORRESPOND TO EACH OTHER.PROVIDE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR EITHER ONE, BUT DON'T MISMATCH ONE |
| | WITH THE OTHER. |
| | |
| | (2) ARCHITECT'S PLANS CALL FOR WINDOWS WITH |
| | HURRICANE MISSILE IMPACT GLAZING. FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FL7938 IS NOT FOR IMPACT GLAZING AND THIS IS |
| | THE ONE THAT ARCHITECT APPROVED. WHY? |
| | |
| | E) EXTERIOR SWINGING DOORS:INFORMATION SUBMITTED |
| | REQUIRES THE FOLLOWING: |
| | (1) FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL253 AND NOA |
| | 05-0103.03 DON'T CORRESPOND TO EACH OTHER. THESE ARE |
| | TWO DIFFERENT PRODUCT APPROVALS. NEED TO SUBMIT |
| | COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR EITHER ONE. |
| | |
| | (2) FL253-R0DOESN'T HAVE ANY DRAWINGS AND IS FOR |
| | CODE VERSION 2001.NEED TO PROVIDE 2004 CODE VERSION. |
| | ARCHITECT TO MAKE SURE CORRECT CODE EDITION IS USED |
| | PRIOR TO APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 5- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. MAKE SURE NAME OR ARCHITECT OR |
| | COMPANY NAME IS INCLUDEDTO VERIFYTHAT DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD IS THE ONE APPROVING THE PRODUCT APPROVALS. |
| | |
| | 6- PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECS FOR BBQ GRILL AS REQUESTED ON |
| | PREVIOUS CHECKLIST. |
| | NOTE:MAKE SURE BBQ GRILL IS DESIGNED FOR INSTALLATION |
| | IN PORCH AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 7- ARCHITECT TO SPECIFY ROOF TILE FASTENING AS REQUIRED |
| | BY BY SEC. 106.1.1.2CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. NEW |
| | DETAIL SUBMITTED ONLY IDENTIFIES RIDGE INSTALLATION, |
| | WHICH IS REQUIRED BY RAS 118.IT DOESN'T SPECIFY HOW |
| | ARE THE RESTOF TILES INSTALLED. IT'S GOING TO BE |
| | POLYPRO ADHESIVE OR NAILS OR SCREWS. IF USING NAILS OR |
| | SCREWS, THEN SPECIFY SIZE AND NUMBER. IF USING POLYPRO, |
| | THEN PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 8- SPECIFY ATTIC VENTILATION AT NEW CUPOLA AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. R806 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE .EVEN |
| | THOUGH THE CUPOLA IS DECORATIVE, STILL VENTILATION IS |
| | REQUIRED. THERE ARE NOT EXCEPTIONS IN THE CODE. |
| | |
| | 9- SPECIFY ALL LIVE AND DEAD LOADS, INCLUDING ATTIC |
| | LIVE LOADS AS REQUIRED BY TABLE R301.5 OF 2004 FLORIDA |
| | RESIDENTIAL CODE. ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE LETTER SAID "SEE |
| | REVISIONS TO SHEET S.3". THERE ARE NOT REVISIONS |
| | SHOWING THE LOADS ON SHEET S.3. |
| | IN ADDITION REVISE NOTE D4 ON SHEET S.1 TO INCLUDE ALL |
| | LOADS INCLUDING THE ATTIC LIVE LOAD. |
| | |
| | 10- SOIL TEST REPORT PROVIDED REQUIRES THE FOLLOWING: |
| | A) ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY |
| | CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTE AND SEC. 61G15-23.002 OF |
| | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. REPORT SUBMITTED HAVE COPY |
| | OF THE SIGNATURE. |
| | |
| | B) REPORT NEEDS TO HAVE THE FIRM'S CERTIFICATE OF |
| | AUTHORIZATION NUMBER AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 61G15-23.002 |
| | OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. |
| | |
| | 11- COORDINATE FOOTING SIZE SHOWN ON DETAIL1/S.2 WITH |
| | FOOTING SCHEDULE TO MATCH.SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 12- COORDINATE LINTEL SCHEDULE WITH OPENING SIZE SHOWN |
| | ON PLANS. EG:CHECK LINTEL L3 IN DINING ROOM AREA. |
| | SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 13- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAIL/SPECS FOR SOFFIT |
| | CONSTRUCTION. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | DETAIL4/S.3 DOESN'T IDENTIFY SOFFIT CONTRUCTION.IF |
| | USING STUCCO SEE ASTM C926 AND ASTM C1063 TO GET PROPER |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | ALSO, THERE ARE NOT SPECS FOR CEILING INSTALLATION AT |
| | MASTER BEDROOM AND ENTRY PORCH. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 14- SHEET A.1: |
| | A) KEY LEGEND AND FIRE RATING AND LIFE SAFETY NOTES |
| | DON'T MATCH. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) EGRESS NOTE #2 CALLS FOR OPENING "MIN 22" WIDE OR |
| | 24" HIGH" IS INCORRECT.IT CAN'T BE ONE OR THE OTHER. |
| | IT MUST MEET BOTH MINIMUM DIMENSIONS. SEE SEC. R310 OF |
| | 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE AND REVISE NOTE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | C) CLARIFY NOTE #3. WHERE IS THIS INFORMATION TAKEN |
| | FROM?SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 15- ALL EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS,SECTION4/A.6, SECTIONS |
| | ON SHEET A.7AND A.8,AND SEC. 2 /S.3 CALL FOR 5/8" |
| | ROOF SHEATHING. SPECIFICATION PS-1 ON SHEET S.1 |
| | CALLS FOR 3/4"ROOF SHEATHING. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO |
| | MATCH. SEC. 106.1.2CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 16- SHEET S.2: |
| | A) NEW TYP. COLUMN CONNECTOR DETAIL: SIZE OF WEDGE |
| | ANCHOR SPECIFIED ON SECTION DOESN'T MATCH SIZE |
| | SPECIFIED ON STEEL PLATE PLAN. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO |
| | MATCH. |
| | |
| | B) SPECIFY COLUMNS AT ENTRY PORCH. THEY ARE SHOWN |
| | BIGGER THAN THE 8"COLUMN SPECIFIED FOR BREEZEWAY. |
| | |
| | 17-SHEET S.3: |
| | A) SPECIFY CONNECTORS AT TOP OF WOOD COLUMNS AT |
| | CORNER AREAS SHOWING HOW ARE WOOD BEAMS COMING FROM 2 |
| | DIFFERENT DIRECTIONSARE CONNECTED.SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | B) SPECIFY END CONNECTORSFOR WOOD BEAMS AT MASTER |
| | BEDROOM AND ENTRY PORCH SHOWING HOW ARE BEAMS SUPPORTED |
| | ON MASONRY WALL. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC |
| | 2004 |
| | |
| | C) CONNECTION SCHEDULE: |
| | (1) SIMPSON STRAP LTS18 IS NOT DESIGNED TO PROVIDE |
| | LATERAL SUPPORT. WHERE IS THE 200# TAKEN FROM? AND WHAT |
| | LATERAL LOAD (PERPENDICULAR OR PARALLEL) IS THIS NUMBER |
| | FOR?SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | (2) SPECIFY BOTH LATERAL LOADS FOR WHICHSIMPSON |
| | HETA20 IS DESIGNED FOR. SEE SIMPSON CATALOG. |
| | |
| | (3) WHERE IS UPLIFT LOAD FOR SIMPSON HETA20 TAKEN |
| | FROM?. IT DOESN'T MATCH UPLIFT LOAD TESTED AND |
| | PUBLISHED BY THE MANUFACTURER. SEE CURRENT CATALOG AND |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | (4) CONNECTOR SPECIFIED ON SECTION 2 DOESN'T MATCH |
| | CONNECTION SCHEDULE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | (5) SECTION 2 DOESN'T MATCH SECTION 4/A.7.THERE |
| | ARE TWO ADDITIONALTOP PLATES SPECIFIED ON DETAIL |
| | 4/A.7. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | |
| | (6) SIZE OF POST SPECIFIED ON DETAIL 2/S.3 DOESN'T |
| | MATCH SIZE SPECIFIED ON FOUNDATION PLAN. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |