| Date |
Text |
| 2007-10-12 11:28:17 | RESIDENTIAL ADDITIONBUILDING REVIEW SECOND |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | REVIEW UNDER 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE, EXISTING |
| | BUILDING 2004 AND FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 1- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. 713.13 FLORIDA STATUTE. REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | 2- BRING PLANS TO PALM BEACH COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD |
| | (561)233-5115)TO VERIFY IF IMPACT FEES ARE DUE. BRING |
| | BACK STAMPED PLANS AND COPY OF PAID RECEIPT IF IMPACT |
| | FEES ARE DUE. REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | 3- HOUSE IS LOCATED IN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT. NEED TO |
| | BRING REVISED PLANS TO THE FIFTH FLOOR OF CITY HALL TO |
| | GET PLANS APPROVED AND STAMPED BY THE HISTORIC |
| | DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE.***NOTE: |
| | THIS COMMENT WAS NOT ADDRESSED ON PREVIOUS CHECKLIST |
| | BECAUSE ONLY ON 8/30/07 WAS THIS PROPERTY POSTED AS |
| | BEING IN THE HISTORIC DISTRICT. |
| | |
| | 4- PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALSAS REQUIRED |
| | BY DCA RULE 9B-72 FOR (REPEAT COMMENT): |
| | A) FLAT ROOF ASSEMBLY.AND, CLEARLY IDENTIFY |
| | SPECIFIC ASSEMBLY TO BE INSTALLED ALONG WITH SPECIFIC |
| | FASTENING OPTION AND RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR NAIL |
| | ENHANCING AT PERIMETER AND CORNER AREAS AS REQUIRED BY |
| | GENERAL LIMITATION #7.IF GENERAL LIMITATION #7 |
| | REQUIRES CALCULATIONS TO BE DONE BY ANY OF THE |
| | PROFESSIONALS LISTED IN THE GENERAL LIMITATION, THEN |
| | SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED. SEE ATTACHED COPY |
| | OF CITY POLICY FOR ROOFING PERMITS. |
| | |
| | B) SWING DOOR FOR STORAGE ROOM. |
| | |
| | C) AWNING WINDOWS. |
| | |
| | D) STORM SHUTTERS. AND, PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | INSTALLATION SCHEDULE.SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO |
| | FBC 2004.SEE ATTACHED SAMPLE. AND, MARK ON DRAWINGS |
| | SPECIFIC MOUNTING CONDITIONSAND ANCHOR TYPE AND |
| | SPACING TO BE USED. |
| | |
| | E) ALL SIMPSON AND USP CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON |
| | PLANS. PROVIDE ONLY THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER |
| | PAGE AND THE PAGE WHERE SELECTED CONNECTOR IS SHOWN. |
| | |
| | 5- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING)ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | ***NOTE: ENGINEER PROVIDED SEPARATE SHEET LISTING ALL |
| | THE PRODUCT APPROVALS HE APPROVED FOR THIS PROJECT BUT |
| | MOST OF THEPRODUCT APPROVALS LISTED IN THE LETTER |
| | DON'T CORRESPOND TO THOSESHOWN ON PLANS.EG: |
| | ENGINEERAPPROVEDSHINGLES,WHILE PLANS SHOW FLAT |
| | ROOF.ENGINEER APPROVED GARAGE DOOR, WHILE THERE IS |
| | NOT GARAGE DOOR BUT STORAGE DOOR. ENGINEER APPROVED |
| | SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS, WHILE PLANS SHOW AWNING WINDOWS. |
| | ENGINEER TO CAREFULLY REVIEW PLANS AND PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS AND PROVIDE CORRECT LIST OR PROVIDE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL REVIEW STAMP ON EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 6- PROVIDE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 13-600 FBC 2004. PLEASE MAKE SURE REVISED 2004 FORM |
| | IS USED. REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | 7- OWES $1117.48FOR UPDATED VALUATIONAS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. 108.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | VALUE WAS REVISED FROM PREVIOUS CHECKLIST BECAUSE FLOOR |
| | AREAS WERE REVISED ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | 8- SHEET S-1: |
| | A) REVISE FLOOR TO FLOOR CONNECTION DETAIL: |
| | * IS 2" O.C. THE CORRECT SPACING OF REBARS?.REPEAT |
| | COMMENT. |
| | ***NOTE:SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS DETAIL MAKE NO SENSE. |
| | PLEASE RE-WRITEAS REQUIRED TO CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | B) F1 DETAIL:KEY ON PLANS WHERE IS THIS DETAIL |
| | TAKEN AT. THIS DETAIL DOESN'TCORRESPOND TO THE NEW |
| | ADDITION. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | C) FOUNDATION PLAN AND FLOOR PLAN SHOWS NO RECESS AT |
| | DOORS THRESHOLDS.DRAW CORRECTLY AND SPECIFY THE |
| | DROPS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. REPEAT |
| | COMMENT. |
| | |
| | E) IF PATIO SLAB IS EXISTING, THEN PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW FORMINGTHE NEW |
| | CONCRETE PAD UNDER THE SLAB FOR STEEL COLUMNS. SEC. |
| | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 9- SHEET S-2: |
| | A) UPDATE TRUSS ANCHOR SCHEDULE. SEE CURRENT CATALOG |
| | AND REVISE AS REQUIRED.OTHERWISE, PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | ENGINEERING ANALYSIS FOR SIZE, NUMBER AND UPLIFT LOADS |
| | THAT DIFFER FROM THOSE TESTED AND PUBLISHED BY THE |
| | MANUFACTURER. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | B) REVISE ROOF SHEATHING NAIL TYPE. SEEREVISED |
| | SEC. R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR |
| | MINIMUM TYPE OF NAILAND REVISE AS REQUIRED. REPEAT |
| | COMMENT. |
| | |
| | C)CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON ROOF FRAMING PLAN ARE |
| | NOT APPROPRIATE ACCORDING TO THE STRUCTURE TO BE |
| | ATTACHED TO.NEED TO SPECIFYWOOD TO MASONRY |
| | CONNECTORS AT EXISTING WALL AND WOOD TO WOOD CONNECTORS |
| | AT NEW WOOD BEAM.REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 106.1.2 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | D) SPECIFY CONNECTORS AT TOP AND BOTTOM OF STEEL |
| | COLUMNS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. NEED |
| | TO SPECIFY TOP CONNECTOR AT CORNER AREA. SEE ROOF |
| | FRAMING PLAN. |
| | |
| | 10- SHEET D-1: |
| | A) TYPICALWALL SECTION DOESN'T CORRESPOND TO |
| | PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN AND ROOF FRAMING PLAN. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. REPEAT COMMENT.REVISE SIZE OF ROOF |
| | RAFTERS. |
| | |
| | |
| | B) PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONCRETE CURB |
| | SHOWN ON TYPICAL WALL SECTION. SPECIFY HOW LONGIS THE |
| | 5/8" DIAM. THREADUSED TO CONNECT THE WALL 2X6 WOOD |
| | PLATE TO THE FOOTING. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO |
| | FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | C) TYPICAL WALL SECTION: SPECIFY HOW ARE 2X6WOOD |
| | STUDS FASTENED TO THE BOTTOM PLATE. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | 11- PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THIS CHECKLIST |
| | TOMAKE SURE ALL ITEMS ARE ADDRESSED AND TO EXPEDITE |
| | THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
